Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM): Lessons Learned from 32 Case Events in 2069 Spine Cases

Matthew R. Eager, Adam L. Shimer, F. Jahangiri, F. Shen, V. Arlet
{"title":"Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM): Lessons Learned from 32 Case Events in 2069 Spine Cases","authors":"Matthew R. Eager, Adam L. Shimer, F. Jahangiri, F. Shen, V. Arlet","doi":"10.1080/1086508X.2011.11079827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is becoming the standard of care for many spinal surgeries, especially those with deformity correction and instrumentation. We reviewed 2069 spine cases with multimodality IONM including somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEP), and spontaneous and triggered electromyography (s-EMG and t-EMG) in a University setting over a period of four years to examine perioperative clinical findings when an IONM event was noted and to ascertain how IONM has affected our ability to avoid potential neurological injury during spine surgery. We performed a retrospective analysis of cases from 2006 to 2010 to study the frequency and cause of intraoperative events detected via IONM and the clinical outcome of the patient. There were 32 cases (1.5%) with possible intraoperative events. There were 17 (53%) cases where IONM changes affected the course of the surgery and prevented possible postoperative neurological deficits. Seven cases (41%) were due to deformity correction, five (29%) due to hypotension, four (24%) due to patient positioning, and one (6%) due to a screw requiring repositioning. None of the 17 patients had postoperative motor or sensory deficits. There were four cases with false-positive IONM findings due to correctible technical issues. Three cases required surgical revision due to pedicle screw malposition. In each case, s-EMGs failed to exhibit intraoperative changes but the patient presented with postoperative radiculopathy. We believe that the use of t-EMGs may have prevented these complications. This review reinforces the importance of multimodality IONM for spinal surgery. The incidence of possible events in our series was 1.5%, and several likely postoperative neurologic deficits were avoided by intraoperative intervention.","PeriodicalId":7480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology","volume":"274 1","pages":"247 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1086508X.2011.11079827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is becoming the standard of care for many spinal surgeries, especially those with deformity correction and instrumentation. We reviewed 2069 spine cases with multimodality IONM including somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEP), and spontaneous and triggered electromyography (s-EMG and t-EMG) in a University setting over a period of four years to examine perioperative clinical findings when an IONM event was noted and to ascertain how IONM has affected our ability to avoid potential neurological injury during spine surgery. We performed a retrospective analysis of cases from 2006 to 2010 to study the frequency and cause of intraoperative events detected via IONM and the clinical outcome of the patient. There were 32 cases (1.5%) with possible intraoperative events. There were 17 (53%) cases where IONM changes affected the course of the surgery and prevented possible postoperative neurological deficits. Seven cases (41%) were due to deformity correction, five (29%) due to hypotension, four (24%) due to patient positioning, and one (6%) due to a screw requiring repositioning. None of the 17 patients had postoperative motor or sensory deficits. There were four cases with false-positive IONM findings due to correctible technical issues. Three cases required surgical revision due to pedicle screw malposition. In each case, s-EMGs failed to exhibit intraoperative changes but the patient presented with postoperative radiculopathy. We believe that the use of t-EMGs may have prevented these complications. This review reinforces the importance of multimodality IONM for spinal surgery. The incidence of possible events in our series was 1.5%, and several likely postoperative neurologic deficits were avoided by intraoperative intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中神经生理监测(IONM):对2069例脊柱病例32例事件的总结
摘要术中神经生理监测(IONM)正在成为许多脊柱手术的护理标准,特别是那些畸形矫正和内固定手术。我们回顾了一所大学四年来2069例多模式IONM脊柱病例,包括体感诱发电位(SSEP)、经颅电运动诱发电位(TCeMEP)、自发和触发肌电图(s-EMG和t-EMG),以检查IONM事件被注意到的围手术期临床表现,并确定IONM如何影响我们在脊柱手术中避免潜在神经损伤的能力。我们对2006年至2010年的病例进行了回顾性分析,以研究IONM检测到的术中事件的频率和原因以及患者的临床结果。32例(1.5%)可能发生术中事件。有17例(53%)患者的IONM改变影响了手术过程,防止了术后可能出现的神经功能缺损。7例(41%)由于畸形矫正,5例(29%)由于低血压,4例(24%)由于患者体位,1例(6%)由于螺钉需要重新定位。17例患者均无术后运动或感觉缺陷。由于可纠正的技术问题,有4例IONM结果假阳性。3例因椎弓根螺钉错位需要手术矫正。在每个病例中,s- emg均未显示术中改变,但患者表现为术后神经根病变。我们相信t- emg的使用可以预防这些并发症。这篇综述强调了多模态IONM在脊柱手术中的重要性。在我们的研究中,可能事件的发生率为1.5%,术中干预避免了一些可能的术后神经功能缺损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Water Management Projects in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Examining the Ethical Considerations Surrounding the Development and Use of AI Design and Implementation of a Secure Virtual Private Network Over an Open Network (Internet) Effects of ICT in Hotel Industry in South Africa Use of Mobile Phones in Nigeria to Prevent Crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1