Individual Determinacy and Identity Criteria in Ontology-Driven Information Systems

João R. M. Nicola, G. Guizzardi
{"title":"Individual Determinacy and Identity Criteria in Ontology-Driven Information Systems","authors":"João R. M. Nicola, G. Guizzardi","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-910-2-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea that the real-world entities referred to by Information Systems are determinate and uniquely identifiable is a commonly held assumption in the fields of Software Engineering and Database Systems. The concept of identity is also a central topic in Formal Ontology, a discipline that finds application in the field of Information Systems through the use of Foundational Ontologies (FOs). However, while most central concepts of Formal Ontology are, in general explicitly addressed in FOs, the concept of identity has received relatively little attention. The lack of a proper ontological characterization of identity in FOs hinders their application to the analysis of issues related to identification in Information Systems, such as those that arise in conceptual modeling or in database design. This work proposes two distinct, but logically equivalent, formal characterizations of the notion of individual determinacy. Moreover, these characterizations are independent of the particularities of a FO’s theory and are defined solely in terms of the structure of the FO’s models of portions of reality. Finally, it also introduces a few concepts that are useful in the analysis of identity criteria for the individuals represented using a FO’s theory.","PeriodicalId":90829,"journal":{"name":"Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS (Conference)","volume":"19 1","pages":"83-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-910-2-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The idea that the real-world entities referred to by Information Systems are determinate and uniquely identifiable is a commonly held assumption in the fields of Software Engineering and Database Systems. The concept of identity is also a central topic in Formal Ontology, a discipline that finds application in the field of Information Systems through the use of Foundational Ontologies (FOs). However, while most central concepts of Formal Ontology are, in general explicitly addressed in FOs, the concept of identity has received relatively little attention. The lack of a proper ontological characterization of identity in FOs hinders their application to the analysis of issues related to identification in Information Systems, such as those that arise in conceptual modeling or in database design. This work proposes two distinct, but logically equivalent, formal characterizations of the notion of individual determinacy. Moreover, these characterizations are independent of the particularities of a FO’s theory and are defined solely in terms of the structure of the FO’s models of portions of reality. Finally, it also introduces a few concepts that are useful in the analysis of identity criteria for the individuals represented using a FO’s theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本体驱动信息系统中的个体确定性和身份标准
信息系统所引用的现实世界实体是确定的和唯一可识别的,这是软件工程和数据库系统领域中普遍持有的假设。身份的概念也是形式本体论的一个中心主题,形式本体论是一门通过使用基础本体论(FOs)在信息系统领域找到应用的学科。然而,虽然形式本体论的大多数核心概念通常在FOs中得到了明确的解决,但身份的概念却很少受到关注。由于在信息系统中缺乏对身份的适当本体论特征,妨碍了将其应用于分析信息系统中与身份有关的问题,例如在概念建模或数据库设计中出现的问题。这项工作提出了两个不同的,但在逻辑上等同,正式表征的概念的个人确定性。此外,这些特征与FO理论的特殊性无关,并且仅根据FO的部分现实模型的结构来定义。最后,它还介绍了一些概念,这些概念在分析使用FO理论表示的个体的身份标准时很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fiat Surfaces in the Basic Formal Ontology. Axiomatizing SNOMED CT Disorders: Should There Be Room for Interpretation? Asymmetric Hybrids: Dialogues for Computational Concept Combination Debugging Classical Ontologies Using Defeasible Reasoning Tools Towards a Unified Dispositional Framework for Realizable Entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1