Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy on the postoperative complication rate in rectal cancer

Kruschewski M, Gröne J, Lauscher J, Daum S, Moser L, Buhr Hj
{"title":"Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy on the postoperative complication rate in rectal cancer","authors":"Kruschewski M, Gröne J, Lauscher J, Daum S, Moser L, Buhr Hj","doi":"10.14312/2052-4994.2014-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) on the postoperative complication rate is discussed controversially. Thus the aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complication rate in our patient population. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to examine all patients documented online who had undergone conventionally fractionated adjuvant or neoadjuvant CRT from 2001 to 2009 in conjunction with curative resection (R0) for sporadic primary colorectal cancer in the middle or lower third. A total of 246 patients were included and analyzed. Two groups were formed: Group I, 2001-2004, adjuvant CRT, n108, and Group II, 2005-2009, neoadjuvant CRT, n138. Results: The two groups had comparable patient-, tumorand therapyrelated characteristics. No difference was found in the anastomotic leak rate (Group I vs. II: 10% vs. 11%). The rate of perineal wound healing problems differed significantly (Group I vs. II: 5% vs. 36%, p0.016). While no patient died in Group I, lethality amounted to 1.5% (2/138) in Group II. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant CRT does not lead to a higher anastomotic leak rate or lethality in comparison to patients who were primarily operated and received adjuvant CRT in the further course. The rate of perineal wound healing problems is significantly increased.","PeriodicalId":90205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","volume":"51 1","pages":"169-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2014-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) on the postoperative complication rate is discussed controversially. Thus the aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complication rate in our patient population. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to examine all patients documented online who had undergone conventionally fractionated adjuvant or neoadjuvant CRT from 2001 to 2009 in conjunction with curative resection (R0) for sporadic primary colorectal cancer in the middle or lower third. A total of 246 patients were included and analyzed. Two groups were formed: Group I, 2001-2004, adjuvant CRT, n108, and Group II, 2005-2009, neoadjuvant CRT, n138. Results: The two groups had comparable patient-, tumorand therapyrelated characteristics. No difference was found in the anastomotic leak rate (Group I vs. II: 10% vs. 11%). The rate of perineal wound healing problems differed significantly (Group I vs. II: 5% vs. 36%, p0.016). While no patient died in Group I, lethality amounted to 1.5% (2/138) in Group II. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant CRT does not lead to a higher anastomotic leak rate or lethality in comparison to patients who were primarily operated and received adjuvant CRT in the further course. The rate of perineal wound healing problems is significantly increased.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新辅助放化疗对直肠癌术后并发症的影响
目的:探讨新辅助放化疗(CRT)对术后并发症发生率的影响。因此,本研究的目的是评估我们患者群体的术后并发症发生率。方法:回顾性分析了2001年至2009年在线记录的所有接受常规分级辅助或新辅助CRT并结合根治性切除(R0)治疗散发性原发性结直肠癌中下三分之一的患者。共纳入并分析了246例患者。分为两组:第一组,2001-2004年,辅助CRT,108;第二组,2005-2009年,新辅助CRT,138。结果:两组患者、肿瘤和治疗相关特征具有可比性。两组吻合口漏率差异无统计学意义(ⅰ组vsⅱ组:10% vs 11%)。会阴创面愈合问题发生率差异有统计学意义(I组与II组:5% vs. 36%, p0.016)。ⅰ组无患者死亡,ⅱ组病死率为1.5%(2/138)。结论:与先行手术后再行辅助CRT的患者相比,新辅助CRT不会导致更高的吻合口漏率或死亡率。会阴伤口愈合问题的发生率明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vulva and lower limb cancer: Results of inguinal lymph node staging on 81 cases Advances in artificial neural networks as a disease prediction tool Deuterium depletion inhibits lung cancer cell growth and migration in vitro and results in severalfold increase of median survival time of non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving conventional therapy Unique challenges and the changing face of oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond Variability in the metabolism of saccharides in bladder and colon cancer cell lines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1