“I thought asking the experts of the board first before turning at the unctuous salesmen.” Requesting special field related advice and information on online communities

Eveliina Salmela
{"title":"“I thought asking the experts of the board first before turning at the unctuous salesmen.” Requesting special field related advice and information on online communities","authors":"Eveliina Salmela","doi":"10.24989/fs.v44i3-4.2178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on requesting and sharing specialized information on online communities. The aim was to find out how requesting and receiving special field related information function on online discussions about heat pumps in Finland. The data consists of 300 message threads collected from two Finnish discussion boards, Lampopumput.info (heatpumps.info) and Suomi24.fi (Finland24.fi). The data was analyzed using discourse analytic methods and pragmatic concepts such as speech acts, politeness, relevance and humor. The results demonstrate the sense of community as an important part of the specialized communication in online peer support discussions. The appropriate wording of the messages, politeness and giving one’s personal contribution to the community are important factors in conveying information through online communities. Online peer discussions have several different communicative goals, such as requesting and offering technical support, requesting advice, sharing experiences and expressing views and opinions. Users use different platforms to carry out these goals. Requesting advice and sharing information were emphasized on the discussion board that requires registration from the contributors. The discussion board, which required registration, was more specific to the topic and community like. There were more direct answers and dialog between the users than on the anonymous discussion board. On the open discussion board, which did not require registration, writers expressed more their own personal views and opinions and discussed especially about topics related to the purchase situation. \nKeywords: Asynchronous online discussion, online communities, technical communication, peer advice, requesting advice","PeriodicalId":41240,"journal":{"name":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v44i3-4.2178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on requesting and sharing specialized information on online communities. The aim was to find out how requesting and receiving special field related information function on online discussions about heat pumps in Finland. The data consists of 300 message threads collected from two Finnish discussion boards, Lampopumput.info (heatpumps.info) and Suomi24.fi (Finland24.fi). The data was analyzed using discourse analytic methods and pragmatic concepts such as speech acts, politeness, relevance and humor. The results demonstrate the sense of community as an important part of the specialized communication in online peer support discussions. The appropriate wording of the messages, politeness and giving one’s personal contribution to the community are important factors in conveying information through online communities. Online peer discussions have several different communicative goals, such as requesting and offering technical support, requesting advice, sharing experiences and expressing views and opinions. Users use different platforms to carry out these goals. Requesting advice and sharing information were emphasized on the discussion board that requires registration from the contributors. The discussion board, which required registration, was more specific to the topic and community like. There were more direct answers and dialog between the users than on the anonymous discussion board. On the open discussion board, which did not require registration, writers expressed more their own personal views and opinions and discussed especially about topics related to the purchase situation. Keywords: Asynchronous online discussion, online communities, technical communication, peer advice, requesting advice
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我想在面对那些油嘴滑舌的推销员之前,先问问董事会的专家。”请求有关在线社区的特殊领域的建议和信息
本研究的重点是在线社区的专业信息请求和共享。目的是找出请求和接收特殊领域相关信息对芬兰热泵在线讨论的作用。这些数据包括从两个芬兰讨论板Lampopumput.info (heatpumps.info)和Suomi24收集的300条消息。fi (Finland24.fi)。运用语篇分析法和语用学概念如言语行为、礼貌、相关性和幽默等对数据进行分析。结果表明,社区意识是在线同伴支持讨论中专业交流的重要组成部分。信息的恰当措辞、礼貌以及对社区的个人贡献是通过网络社区传递信息的重要因素。在线同伴讨论有几个不同的交流目标,如请求和提供技术支持、请求建议、分享经验和表达观点和意见。用户使用不同的平台来实现这些目标。在需要贡献者注册的讨论板上强调了请求建议和共享信息。需要注册的讨论板更具体地针对主题和社区的喜好。与匿名讨论板相比,用户之间有更多直接的答案和对话。在不需要注册的开放讨论板上,作者们更多地表达了自己的个人观点和意见,并讨论了与购买情况有关的话题。关键词:异步在线讨论,在线社区,技术交流,同伴咨询,请求咨询
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Funktionen von Unsicherheitsthematisierungen in journalistischen Medien The Impact of Communicating Advocacy and Scientific Uncertainty on a Scientist’s Trustworthiness Corpus Approaches to Analysing Uncertainty and Ignorance in Academic Discourse Konstitution von Nichtwissen und Unsicherheit im Sprachgebrauch – ein programmatischer Systematisierungsversuch Beraten und Prognostizieren. Unsicheres Wissen in der institutionellen vs. der massenmedialen Politikberatung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1