S. Shuaibu, Ifiok P. Umana, Olutayo Osunaiye, Bem Jila, I. Akpayak, C. G. Ofoha
{"title":"Palliative management of bilateral malignant ureteric obstruction","authors":"S. Shuaibu, Ifiok P. Umana, Olutayo Osunaiye, Bem Jila, I. Akpayak, C. G. Ofoha","doi":"10.4103/jomt.jomt_26_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Malignant ureteric obstruction is often associated with end-stage cancer arising from the cervix, bladder, prostate and other pelvic organs. We reviewed palliative therapeutic options and outcome of patients with bilateral malignant ureteric obstruction at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH). Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Data from patients managed by the Urology division of JUTH for patients with bilateral ureteric obstruction of malignant cause over a period of 10 years were reviewed. Patients’ age, cause of malignant ureteric obstruction and types of interventions carried out were extracted. In addition, mean serum creatinine level at presentation and one-month post intervention were analysed. The overall patient survival over a 6-month period was evaluated. Data were analysed using SPSS version 23. Result 24 patients managed within the period of the study had complete data for analysis. The age range was 43-73years with a median of 49 years. Majority (79.2%) of patients were female. 54.2% of the patients had open nephrostomy. Retrograde ureteric stent insertion (16.6%) and permanent haemodialysis (29.2%) were the other palliative management options. Open nephrostomy offered the most significant improvement in biochemical outcome at one-month post intervention (P = 0.039). 41.6% of patients were alive at 6 months post intervention. None of the treatment options conferred survival advantage over the others. Conclusion Open nephrostomy is the most common palliative management option for patients with bilateral malignant ureteric obstruction at JUTH and achieves the most significant biochemical improvement. No palliative management option conferred superior survival outcome among the patients.","PeriodicalId":16477,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine in the Tropics","volume":"2021 1","pages":"64 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine in the Tropics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jomt.jomt_26_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Malignant ureteric obstruction is often associated with end-stage cancer arising from the cervix, bladder, prostate and other pelvic organs. We reviewed palliative therapeutic options and outcome of patients with bilateral malignant ureteric obstruction at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH). Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Data from patients managed by the Urology division of JUTH for patients with bilateral ureteric obstruction of malignant cause over a period of 10 years were reviewed. Patients’ age, cause of malignant ureteric obstruction and types of interventions carried out were extracted. In addition, mean serum creatinine level at presentation and one-month post intervention were analysed. The overall patient survival over a 6-month period was evaluated. Data were analysed using SPSS version 23. Result 24 patients managed within the period of the study had complete data for analysis. The age range was 43-73years with a median of 49 years. Majority (79.2%) of patients were female. 54.2% of the patients had open nephrostomy. Retrograde ureteric stent insertion (16.6%) and permanent haemodialysis (29.2%) were the other palliative management options. Open nephrostomy offered the most significant improvement in biochemical outcome at one-month post intervention (P = 0.039). 41.6% of patients were alive at 6 months post intervention. None of the treatment options conferred survival advantage over the others. Conclusion Open nephrostomy is the most common palliative management option for patients with bilateral malignant ureteric obstruction at JUTH and achieves the most significant biochemical improvement. No palliative management option conferred superior survival outcome among the patients.
背景:恶性输尿管梗阻常与发生于子宫颈、膀胱、前列腺和其他盆腔器官的终末期癌症有关。我们回顾了Jos大学教学医院(JUTH)双侧恶性输尿管梗阻患者的姑息治疗选择和结果。方法采用回顾性横断面研究。我们回顾了10年来JUTH泌尿外科治疗双侧输尿管恶性梗阻患者的资料。提取患者年龄、恶性输尿管梗阻原因及采取的干预措施类型。此外,还分析了发病时和干预后1个月的平均血清肌酐水平。评估患者在6个月期间的总生存率。数据分析采用SPSS version 23。结果24例患者在研究期间有完整的数据可供分析。年龄范围43-73岁,中位数49岁。女性占绝大多数(79.2%)。54.2%的患者行开放性肾造口术。输尿管逆行支架置入(16.6%)和永久性血液透析(29.2%)是其他姑息性管理选择。在干预后1个月,开放式肾造口术对生化指标的改善最为显著(P = 0.039)。41.6%的患者在干预后6个月存活。没有一种治疗方案比其他治疗方案具有生存优势。结论开放肾造口术是JUTH双侧恶性输尿管梗阻患者最常见的姑息治疗选择,生化改善效果最显著。在患者中,没有姑息治疗方案能带来更好的生存结果。