Aspectual features in Role and Reference Grammar: A layered proposal

IF 0.6 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Revista Espanola De Linguistica Aplicada Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1075/RESLA.27.1.02COR
F. Rodríguez
{"title":"Aspectual features in Role and Reference Grammar: A layered proposal","authors":"F. Rodríguez","doi":"10.1075/RESLA.27.1.02COR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The kernel of the semantic representation of a predicate in Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) is based on its characterization in terms of an Aktionsart typology based on Vendler’s (1957) classes plus some additional elements from Smith (1997) and Dowty (1979). This means that event structures are mainly considered a lexical phenomenon pertaining to predicates, and only occasionally higher predicational structures are considered in event construction. Even though this approach is adequate to a great extent, there are still some problems in the approach taken in RRG. The most significant drawback is that non-lexical aspects appear intermingled with predicate-only features, which leads to misinterpretations and misclassifications of predicates. Consequently, it sees more sensible to bring a functional model of grammar like RRG to a compromise position and, thus, consider in what ways different units identified as belonging to the different layers in RRG’s syntactic projections ‘conspire’ in the final aspectual characterization of events. In this line, this paper will propose a classification of aspectual features in terms of the levels found in the functional projection of the clause as devised in RRG, namely the Predicate Level (the domain of Aktionsart typology), the Nucleus (where morphological aspect has scope) and the Core (the locus for what will be described as ‘aspectuality’ features).","PeriodicalId":54145,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Linguistica Aplicada","volume":"21 1","pages":"23-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Linguistica Aplicada","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/RESLA.27.1.02COR","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The kernel of the semantic representation of a predicate in Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) is based on its characterization in terms of an Aktionsart typology based on Vendler’s (1957) classes plus some additional elements from Smith (1997) and Dowty (1979). This means that event structures are mainly considered a lexical phenomenon pertaining to predicates, and only occasionally higher predicational structures are considered in event construction. Even though this approach is adequate to a great extent, there are still some problems in the approach taken in RRG. The most significant drawback is that non-lexical aspects appear intermingled with predicate-only features, which leads to misinterpretations and misclassifications of predicates. Consequently, it sees more sensible to bring a functional model of grammar like RRG to a compromise position and, thus, consider in what ways different units identified as belonging to the different layers in RRG’s syntactic projections ‘conspire’ in the final aspectual characterization of events. In this line, this paper will propose a classification of aspectual features in terms of the levels found in the functional projection of the clause as devised in RRG, namely the Predicate Level (the domain of Aktionsart typology), the Nucleus (where morphological aspect has scope) and the Core (the locus for what will be described as ‘aspectuality’ features).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
角色和引用语法中的方面特征:一个分层的建议
角色和引用语法(RRG)中谓词的语义表示的核心是基于基于Vendler(1957)类的Aktionsart类型学以及来自Smith(1997)和Dowty(1979)的一些附加元素的表征。这意味着事件结构主要被认为是一种与谓词相关的词汇现象,只有偶尔才会在事件构造中考虑更高级的谓词结构。尽管这种方法在很大程度上是足够的,但RRG所采用的方法仍然存在一些问题。最大的缺点是,非词汇方面似乎与仅使用谓词的特性混杂在一起,这会导致对谓词的误解和错误分类。因此,把像RRG这样的语法功能模型放在一个折衷的位置上是更明智的,因此,考虑在RRG的句法投射中,被识别为属于不同层的不同单位是如何在事件的最终方面表征中“合谋”的。在这条线上,本文将根据RRG中设计的子句的功能投影中发现的水平提出方面特征的分类,即谓词水平(Aktionsart类型学的领域),核(形态方面有范围)和核心(将被描述为“方面”特征的轨迹)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Teaching listening for interpreting through mind mapping Sobre la enseñanza de la elisión sintáctica en la clase de gramática del español como lengua extranjera o segunda (ELE/L2) Engaging lower proficiency learners of Spanish in collaborative writing tasks Blurred lines: Un análisis crítico del discurso feminista The acquisition of voicing assimilation by advanced Hungarian learners of Spanish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1