Regulatory landscape analysis of Myanmar Food and Drug Administration based on the World Health Organization Global benchmarking tool

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.29090/psa.2022.05.22.174
Ei Ei Chaw, L. Suntornsuk
{"title":"Regulatory landscape analysis of Myanmar Food and Drug Administration based on the World Health Organization Global benchmarking tool","authors":"Ei Ei Chaw, L. Suntornsuk","doi":"10.29090/psa.2022.05.22.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulatory authorities play significant roles for ensuring quality, safety, and efficacy of pharmaceutical and health products. However, most of the national regulatory authorities in low- and middle-income countries encounter many challenges such as over workload and under-staff/resources to maintain the efficiency in regulatory process. To alleviate the problem, the World Health Organization (WHO) supports its member states and implements the WHO-Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) to strengthen the capacity of the national regulatory system. In this study, the regulatory system of Myanmar was investigated using the WHO-GBT based questionnaire survey. The study aimed to assess the national regulatory system and regulatory activities with WHO-GBT indicators and sub-indicators and to provide recommendations for the future progress of Myanmar Food and Drug Administration (MFDA). The results shows that MFDA has a well-structured legal foundation for the regulatory system and regulatory activities. Interestingly, the National regulatory system is the first priority and most challenging item to be achieved. Human resource capacity is below the standard requirements to operate efficient regulatory activities. It is recommended that the MFDA should implement the guideline on complaints and appeals to regulatory decisions and published documents or channels for laboratory activities within a short to medium period (1-12 months). As a medium to long-term plan (6-12 months and above), a human resource development plan and capacity building should be immediately established to accelerate the regulatory functions. Besides, transparency and public confidence must be promoted in regulatory activities.","PeriodicalId":19761,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29090/psa.2022.05.22.174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Regulatory authorities play significant roles for ensuring quality, safety, and efficacy of pharmaceutical and health products. However, most of the national regulatory authorities in low- and middle-income countries encounter many challenges such as over workload and under-staff/resources to maintain the efficiency in regulatory process. To alleviate the problem, the World Health Organization (WHO) supports its member states and implements the WHO-Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) to strengthen the capacity of the national regulatory system. In this study, the regulatory system of Myanmar was investigated using the WHO-GBT based questionnaire survey. The study aimed to assess the national regulatory system and regulatory activities with WHO-GBT indicators and sub-indicators and to provide recommendations for the future progress of Myanmar Food and Drug Administration (MFDA). The results shows that MFDA has a well-structured legal foundation for the regulatory system and regulatory activities. Interestingly, the National regulatory system is the first priority and most challenging item to be achieved. Human resource capacity is below the standard requirements to operate efficient regulatory activities. It is recommended that the MFDA should implement the guideline on complaints and appeals to regulatory decisions and published documents or channels for laboratory activities within a short to medium period (1-12 months). As a medium to long-term plan (6-12 months and above), a human resource development plan and capacity building should be immediately established to accelerate the regulatory functions. Besides, transparency and public confidence must be promoted in regulatory activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于世界卫生组织全球基准工具的缅甸食品和药物管理局监管格局分析
监管机构在确保药品和保健产品的质量、安全性和有效性方面发挥着重要作用。然而,低收入和中等收入国家的大多数国家监管机构在维持监管过程的效率方面遇到了许多挑战,例如工作量过大和人员/资源不足。为了缓解这一问题,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)支持其成员国并实施世卫组织全球基准工具(GBT),以加强国家监管系统的能力。本研究采用基于WHO-GBT的问卷调查对缅甸的监管制度进行了调查。该研究旨在利用世卫组织- gbt指标和子指标评估国家监管体系和监管活动,并为缅甸食品和药物管理局(MFDA)的未来进展提供建议。结果表明,MFDA的监管体系和监管活动具有结构良好的法律基础。有趣的是,国家监管制度是第一优先和最具挑战性的项目。人力资源能力低于有效开展监管活动的标准要求。建议MFDA在短至中期(1-12个月)内实施针对监管决定和公开文件或实验室活动渠道的投诉和上诉指南。作为中长期规划(6-12个月及以上),应立即制定人力资源开发规划和能力建设,加快发挥监管职能。此外,在监管活动中必须提高透明度和公众信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia
Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia (PSA) journal is a double-blinded peer-reviewed journal in English published quarterly, by the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand. The PSA journal is formerly known as Mahidol University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and committed to the timely publication of innovative articles and reviews. This journal is available in both printed and electronic formats. The PSA journal aims at establishing a publishing house that is open to all. It aims to disseminate knowledge; provide a learned reference in the field; and establish channels of communication between academic and research expert, policy makers and executives in industry and investment institutions. The journal publishes research articles, review articles, and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences and multidisciplinary field in health professions and medicine. More specifically, the journal publishes research on all areas of pharmaceutical sciences and related disciplines: Clinical Pharmacy Drug Synthesis and Discovery Targeted-Drug Delivery Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutical Sciences Phytopharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology and Toxicology Pharmaceutical Chemistry Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods Natural Products Social, Economic, and Administrative Pharmacy Clinical Drug Evaluation and Drug Policy Making Antimicrobials, Resistance and Infection Control Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.
期刊最新文献
Locally-isolated protease-producing Bacillus spp. from soil inhibits biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus Medication errors analysis in Asia and Australia: A systematic review The effect of different sweeteners on the free radical scavenging activities, alcohol contents, sugar reductions, and hedonic properties of green tea kombucha Development and validation of a GC-MS method for determination of amphetamine-type stimulants and ketamine in human hair Effect of zonisamide and Nigella sativa on blood-brain barrier permeability and neurological severity in traumatic brain injury-induced mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1