An Aesthete in Despair: Reading Lolita through Kierkegaard’s Aesthetic Sphere of Existence

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE ARCADIA Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1515/arcadia-2022-9063
Alireza Safari QotbAbadi, M. Hashemi
{"title":"An Aesthete in Despair: Reading Lolita through Kierkegaard’s Aesthetic Sphere of Existence","authors":"Alireza Safari QotbAbadi, M. Hashemi","doi":"10.1515/arcadia-2022-9063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since its publication in 1955, Vladimir Nabokov’s contentious novel Lolita has stirred heated controversies that originated from Nabokov’s treatment of a thorny subject matter. What makes his achievement so stupendous is that he penned a book about a forbidden desire and succeeded in persuading his reader to feel for the deviant. The present study intends to fathom Nabokov’s success in his art of deception drawing on Søren Kierkegaard’s existentialist ideologies of aestheticism and despair in order to offer a new insight regarding the elements used in Humbert’s narration and character which bestow upon him the distinctive personality of the aesthete. Referring to Kierkegaard’s spheres of existence introduced in his “Either/Or,” it is suggested that Humbert, similar to Kierkegaard’s Johannes, aesthetically alienates himself from commitment and consequence while keeping an eye open for the interesting and relishing sensual immediacy. It is this shrewd aestheticizing of Humbert’s character that grants him his unique status that has elicited both attraction and aversion.","PeriodicalId":43010,"journal":{"name":"ARCADIA","volume":"71 1","pages":"301 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCADIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2022-9063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Since its publication in 1955, Vladimir Nabokov’s contentious novel Lolita has stirred heated controversies that originated from Nabokov’s treatment of a thorny subject matter. What makes his achievement so stupendous is that he penned a book about a forbidden desire and succeeded in persuading his reader to feel for the deviant. The present study intends to fathom Nabokov’s success in his art of deception drawing on Søren Kierkegaard’s existentialist ideologies of aestheticism and despair in order to offer a new insight regarding the elements used in Humbert’s narration and character which bestow upon him the distinctive personality of the aesthete. Referring to Kierkegaard’s spheres of existence introduced in his “Either/Or,” it is suggested that Humbert, similar to Kierkegaard’s Johannes, aesthetically alienates himself from commitment and consequence while keeping an eye open for the interesting and relishing sensual immediacy. It is this shrewd aestheticizing of Humbert’s character that grants him his unique status that has elicited both attraction and aversion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绝望中的唯美主义者:从克尔凯郭尔的存在美学领域解读洛丽塔
自1955年出版以来,弗拉基米尔·纳博科夫颇具争议的小说《洛丽塔》引发了激烈的争论,其根源在于纳博科夫对一个棘手主题的处理。使他的成就如此惊人的是,他写了一本关于被禁止的欲望的书,并成功地说服了他的读者对越轨者感到同情。本文旨在借鉴克尔凯郭尔的唯美主义和绝望的存在主义思想,探究纳博科夫在欺骗艺术上的成功之处,以期对亨伯特的叙述和性格中所使用的元素提供新的见解,这些元素赋予了亨伯特独特的唯美主义者个性。参考克尔凯郭尔在他的“非此即彼”中介绍的存在领域,有人认为亨伯特与克尔凯郭尔的约翰内斯类似,在美学上疏远了自己与承诺和后果的关系,同时睁大眼睛寻找有趣和令人愉快的感官直接。正是这种对亨伯特性格的敏锐审美化,赋予了他独特的地位,这既引起了吸引力,也引起了厌恶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARCADIA
ARCADIA LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: arcadia provides a forum for internationally comparative studies that deal with literatures and liberal arts from all parts of the world. Current theories associated with these literatures and liberal arts are discussed. arcadia includes the columns: essays, miscellanea, reviews, submitted works and news.
期刊最新文献
Vera Zimmermann: Grenzenlos menschlich? Tierethische Positionen bei Elias Canetti, Marlen Haushofer und Brigitte Kronauer. Bielefeld: transcript, 2021. 274 S. Reimagining the Body Without Organs Through Exchange Value in Never Let Me Go Nizami, Profane Love and the Melancholy Tradition: Uncovering Amor Heroes in the Indian Princess’ Tale in Seven Beauties The stage-within-the-screen: Peter Brook’s film adaptation of King Lear Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1