Experimental Performance Evaluation Among Cloud Infrastructure Providers Under Different Load Levels

Denis B. Oliveira, R. R. Oliveira, R. F. Vilela, V. H. S. C. Pinto, Roberto N. Ungarelli
{"title":"Experimental Performance Evaluation Among Cloud Infrastructure Providers Under Different Load Levels","authors":"Denis B. Oliveira, R. R. Oliveira, R. F. Vilela, V. H. S. C. Pinto, Roberto N. Ungarelli","doi":"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9639943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Performance testing can estimate the capacity of a web service under requests. Decision-making on the ideal cloud service infrastructures for deploying specific cloud applications is challenging. Goal: Investigation on the performance of cloud infrastructure providers under different load levels. Method: An experimental study evaluated Amazon, Azure, Google, and IBM cloud infrastructure providers in terms of performance under Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) perspective. Results: The results indicated satisfactory performance in response time and latency among most providers when subjected to up to 300 simultaneous threads. However, this effect decreases as the number of threads increases, and Apdex index value and level of user's satisfaction are significantly reduced under different load levels, mainly for the IBM provider. Besides, the error rate rises substantially at 400 threads, with more critical results for IBM and Amazon providers. Conclusions: Providers show distinct differences across metrics, and the data collected during testings reinforced the potential particularities of cloud infrastructure services for the choice of a provider. Although preliminary, such results can support software companies in selecting a proper infrastructure provider according to particular requirements.","PeriodicalId":6803,"journal":{"name":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","volume":"70 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9639943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Performance testing can estimate the capacity of a web service under requests. Decision-making on the ideal cloud service infrastructures for deploying specific cloud applications is challenging. Goal: Investigation on the performance of cloud infrastructure providers under different load levels. Method: An experimental study evaluated Amazon, Azure, Google, and IBM cloud infrastructure providers in terms of performance under Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) perspective. Results: The results indicated satisfactory performance in response time and latency among most providers when subjected to up to 300 simultaneous threads. However, this effect decreases as the number of threads increases, and Apdex index value and level of user's satisfaction are significantly reduced under different load levels, mainly for the IBM provider. Besides, the error rate rises substantially at 400 threads, with more critical results for IBM and Amazon providers. Conclusions: Providers show distinct differences across metrics, and the data collected during testings reinforced the potential particularities of cloud infrastructure services for the choice of a provider. Although preliminary, such results can support software companies in selecting a proper infrastructure provider according to particular requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同负载水平下云基础设施供应商的实验性能评估
背景:性能测试可以估计请求下web服务的容量。对于部署特定云应用程序的理想云服务基础设施的决策是具有挑战性的。目标:调查不同负载水平下云基础设施提供商的性能。方法:一项实验研究评估了亚马逊、Azure、谷歌和IBM云基础设施提供商在基础设施即服务(IaaS)视角下的性能。结果:结果表明,当同时处理多达300个线程时,大多数提供程序在响应时间和延迟方面的性能令人满意。但是,这种影响会随着线程数量的增加而减小,而且Apdex索引值和用户满意度在不同的负载水平下会显著降低,这主要针对IBM提供商。此外,错误率在400个线程时大幅上升,IBM和Amazon提供商的结果更为关键。结论:供应商在各项指标中表现出明显的差异,在测试期间收集的数据强化了云基础设施服务在选择供应商时的潜在特殊性。虽然是初步的,但是这样的结果可以支持软件公司根据特定的需求选择合适的基础设施提供商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structured Text Generation for Spanish Freestyle Battles using Neural Networks Learning factory for the Software Engineering area: First didactic transformation An Early Alert System for Software Vulnerabilities based on Vulnerability Repositories and Social Networks Data Quality Management oriented to the Electronic Medical Record Program Committees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1