Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cholangitis

Shiyi Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cholangitis","authors":"Shiyi Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.03.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cholangitis. \n \n \nMethods \nA retrospective analysis on clinical data from 186 patients with acute cholangitis complicated with choledocholithiasis treated in Linfen Central Hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 was performed. Among them, 80 patients aged over or equal to 80 years were set as observation group, 106 patients aged less than 65 years old were set as control group. General information, comorbidities, ERCP operation and postoperative complications of the two groups were analyzed. \n \n \nResults \nThe rates of hypertension, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes mellitus in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). The rate of performing endoscopic sphincterotomy in the observation group (67.50%, 54/80) was greater than that in the control group (44.34%, 47/106), P 0.05). Four patients had failed intubation in the observation group, and their symptoms were improved by percuteneous transhepatic cholangio drainage. In the control group, five patients had failed intubation, and recovered after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nEmergency ERCP is safe and effective in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cholangitis complicated with common bile duct stones, but close attention should be paid to comorbidities and early detection of possible adverse events. If elderly patients have severe complications, the management of perioperative period should be strengthened. \n \n \nKey words: \nEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Advanced age; Acute cholangitis; Complications","PeriodicalId":9667,"journal":{"name":"Central Plains Medical Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"74-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Plains Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.03.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cholangitis. Methods A retrospective analysis on clinical data from 186 patients with acute cholangitis complicated with choledocholithiasis treated in Linfen Central Hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 was performed. Among them, 80 patients aged over or equal to 80 years were set as observation group, 106 patients aged less than 65 years old were set as control group. General information, comorbidities, ERCP operation and postoperative complications of the two groups were analyzed. Results The rates of hypertension, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes mellitus in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). The rate of performing endoscopic sphincterotomy in the observation group (67.50%, 54/80) was greater than that in the control group (44.34%, 47/106), P 0.05). Four patients had failed intubation in the observation group, and their symptoms were improved by percuteneous transhepatic cholangio drainage. In the control group, five patients had failed intubation, and recovered after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Emergency ERCP is safe and effective in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cholangitis complicated with common bile duct stones, but close attention should be paid to comorbidities and early detection of possible adverse events. If elderly patients have severe complications, the management of perioperative period should be strengthened. Key words: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Advanced age; Acute cholangitis; Complications
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜逆行胆管造影治疗老年急性胆管炎的疗效和安全性
目的评价内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)治疗老年急性胆管炎的疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析临汾市中心医院2015年1月至2018年12月收治的186例急性胆管炎合并胆总管结石患者的临床资料。其中80例年龄≥80岁的患者设为观察组,106例年龄小于65岁的患者设为对照组。分析两组患者一般情况、合并症、ERCP手术及术后并发症。结果观察组患者高血压、脑血管病、糖尿病患病率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组内窥镜下括约肌切开术成功率(67.50%,54/80)高于对照组(44.34%,47/106),P < 0.05)。观察组4例患者插管失败,经皮经肝胆管引流后症状得到改善。对照组5例插管失败,经腹腔镜胆总管取石术恢复。两组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论急诊ERCP治疗老年急性胆管炎合并胆总管结石安全有效,但应注意合并症,早期发现可能的不良事件。老年患者如有严重并发症,应加强围手术期的管理。关键词:内镜逆行胆管造影术;先进的年龄;急性胆管炎;并发症
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical analysis of 200 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block on patients undergoing endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Levels and significance of pepsinogen, gastrin 17 in serum in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis Application value of high-frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of diabetic lower extremity vascular diseases Clinical effects of combination of edaravone, clopidogrel and butylphthalide injection on acute progressive cerebral infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1