Purchase Intent and Appeal of ENDS Products among Current, Former and Never Ever Users of Tobacco Products in the U.S.

Kimberly Frost-Pineda, Robyn Chae, Nicole Dianno, R. Freeland, Michael Polster
{"title":"Purchase Intent and Appeal of ENDS Products among Current, Former and Never Ever Users of Tobacco Products in the U.S.","authors":"Kimberly Frost-Pineda, Robyn Chae, Nicole Dianno, R. Freeland, Michael Polster","doi":"10.2478/cttr-2023-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Background and objectives The last decade has seen extensive research into electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) such as e-cigarettes. Although some studies assess ENDS’ potential benefits, there is a paucity of studies that provide population-level estimates of purchase intent or product appeal among various tobacco user groups, or that have examined the impact of different product characteristics on those variables. Methods Purchase intent and product appeal ratings were analyzed from six online studies for multiple sub-brands of Vuse vapor products (including different flavors, nicotine levels, and device styles). The sample in each study was weighted to represent the adult U.S. population of current established, former established, and never established cigarette smokers on five key demographics; providing population-level estimates. Results Results for purchase intent and appeal are remarkably consistent. Ratings of purchase intent and appeal are higher for current tobacco users (current established cigarette smokers, current established non-cigarette tobacco users, and current tobacco experimenters) than for former and never ever tobacco users. Conclusions and scientific significance These findings show that varying sub-brands of an e-cigarette has little or no impact on population level purchase intent and appeal ratings across tobacco user groups. Additionally, greater variability in ratings among current tobacco experimenters than other tobacco user groups is discussed as well as correlations between measures. This paper provides the first population estimates of both purchase intent and product appeal for various ENDS products among adult tobacco users and nonusers; information that is critical for evaluating the impact on public health. [Contrib. Tob. Nicotine Res. 32 (2023) 34–42]","PeriodicalId":10723,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"34 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2023-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARY Background and objectives The last decade has seen extensive research into electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) such as e-cigarettes. Although some studies assess ENDS’ potential benefits, there is a paucity of studies that provide population-level estimates of purchase intent or product appeal among various tobacco user groups, or that have examined the impact of different product characteristics on those variables. Methods Purchase intent and product appeal ratings were analyzed from six online studies for multiple sub-brands of Vuse vapor products (including different flavors, nicotine levels, and device styles). The sample in each study was weighted to represent the adult U.S. population of current established, former established, and never established cigarette smokers on five key demographics; providing population-level estimates. Results Results for purchase intent and appeal are remarkably consistent. Ratings of purchase intent and appeal are higher for current tobacco users (current established cigarette smokers, current established non-cigarette tobacco users, and current tobacco experimenters) than for former and never ever tobacco users. Conclusions and scientific significance These findings show that varying sub-brands of an e-cigarette has little or no impact on population level purchase intent and appeal ratings across tobacco user groups. Additionally, greater variability in ratings among current tobacco experimenters than other tobacco user groups is discussed as well as correlations between measures. This paper provides the first population estimates of both purchase intent and product appeal for various ENDS products among adult tobacco users and nonusers; information that is critical for evaluating the impact on public health. [Contrib. Tob. Nicotine Res. 32 (2023) 34–42]
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国当前、以前和从未使用过烟草产品的用户对ENDS产品的购买意愿和吸引力
背景和目的在过去的十年中,人们对电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)如电子烟进行了广泛的研究。尽管一些研究评估了ENDS的潜在益处,但很少有研究对不同烟草使用者群体的购买意图或产品吸引力提供人口水平的估计,也很少有研究审查了不同产品特性对这些变量的影响。方法对Vuse多个子品牌电子烟产品(包括不同口味、尼古丁水平和设备类型)的6项在线调查进行购买意向和产品吸引力评分分析。每项研究的样本都经过加权,以代表美国成年人口中目前、以前和从未吸烟的五个关键人口统计数据;提供人口水平的估计。结果购买意向和吸引力的结果非常一致。目前的烟草使用者(目前已确定的卷烟吸烟者、目前已确定的非卷烟烟草使用者和目前的烟草实验者)的购买意向和吸引力评级高于以前和从未使用过烟草的人。结论和科学意义这些研究结果表明,不同的电子烟子品牌对烟草用户群体的人口水平购买意愿和吸引力评级影响很小或没有影响。此外,还讨论了当前烟草实验人员的评级差异比其他烟草使用者群体更大,以及各项措施之间的相关性。本文首次对成年烟草使用者和非烟草使用者对各种ENDS产品的购买意向和产品吸引力进行了人口估计;对评估对公众健康的影响至关重要的信息。(普通发布版。钻头扭矩。尼古丁法规。32 (2023)34-42]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative In Vitro Toxicological Screening of a Closed-End Heated Tobacco Product * Plasma Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches Across Varying Flavours and Nicotine Content * A Pumping Method for Assessing Airtightness of Packs - Application to Heated Tobacco Products * Purchase Intent and Product Appeal of Velo Nicotine Pouches Among Current Tobacco Users and Nonusers of Tobacco How do Risk Perceptions Drive Smokers to Completely Switch to a Smoke-Free Tobacco Product (IQOS™)? A Four-Country Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1