The validation of the Chinese version of Handoff Clinical Examination Exercise

Feifei Chen, Chunmei Wang, Xiaomin Wang, Deyan Cao, Guomei Ye, Xiaoyun Wang, Xing-Feng Lin
{"title":"The validation of the Chinese version of Handoff Clinical Examination Exercise","authors":"Feifei Chen, Chunmei Wang, Xiaomin Wang, Deyan Cao, Guomei Ye, Xiaoyun Wang, Xing-Feng Lin","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Handoff Clinical Examination Exercise (Handoff CEX). \n \n \nMethods \nThe Chinese version of the Handoff CEX was composed of two parts, one to assess the nurse providing the handoff and another to assess the nurse receiving the handoff. A total of 80 handoffs was evaluated to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Handoff CEX. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 320 evaluations of handoff was obtained. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.85 for the handoff provider, and that was 0.80 for the handoff recipient. Weighted kappa scores for provider evaluations ranged from 0.31-0.52, and that for recipient evaluations ranged from 0.35-0.55. The correlation coefficients between each factor ranged from 0.23 to 0.62, and that between each factor and the total scale ranged from 0.33 to 0.64 (P 5 years) received significantly higher mean scores than inexperienced nurses(≤5 years) in all domains except organizational efficiency and professionalism(P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe Chinese version of the Handoff CEX is a reliable and valid tool to assess the nursing handoff, which is useful for educators, supervisors and clinical nurses to provide training, ongoing assessment and feedback to improve the quality of handoff. \n \n \nKey words: \nHandoff; Reliability; Validity; Nurses","PeriodicalId":22999,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practical nursing","volume":"21 1","pages":"462-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practical nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.06.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Handoff Clinical Examination Exercise (Handoff CEX). Methods The Chinese version of the Handoff CEX was composed of two parts, one to assess the nurse providing the handoff and another to assess the nurse receiving the handoff. A total of 80 handoffs was evaluated to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Handoff CEX. Results A total of 320 evaluations of handoff was obtained. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.85 for the handoff provider, and that was 0.80 for the handoff recipient. Weighted kappa scores for provider evaluations ranged from 0.31-0.52, and that for recipient evaluations ranged from 0.35-0.55. The correlation coefficients between each factor ranged from 0.23 to 0.62, and that between each factor and the total scale ranged from 0.33 to 0.64 (P 5 years) received significantly higher mean scores than inexperienced nurses(≤5 years) in all domains except organizational efficiency and professionalism(P<0.05). Conclusion The Chinese version of the Handoff CEX is a reliable and valid tool to assess the nursing handoff, which is useful for educators, supervisors and clinical nurses to provide training, ongoing assessment and feedback to improve the quality of handoff. Key words: Handoff; Reliability; Validity; Nurses
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《交接临床考核练习》中文版的验证
目的检验《交接临床检查练习》中文版的信度和效度。方法中文版的交接CEX分为两部分,对提供交接的护士进行评估,对接受交接的护士进行评估。本研究共对80个交接进行了评估,以检验中文版交接CEX的信度和效度。结果共获得320次交接评价。传递者的Cronbach α系数为0.85,传递者的Cronbach α系数为0.80。提供者评估的加权kappa评分范围为0.31-0.52,接受者评估的加权kappa评分范围为0.35-0.55。各因素与总量表的相关系数在0.23 ~ 0.62之间,各因素与总量表的相关系数在0.33 ~ 0.64之间(P<0.05), 5年的护士除组织效率和专业水平外,其余各方面的平均得分均显著高于经验不足(≤5年)的护士(P<0.05)。结论中文版的交接CEX是一种可靠、有效的评估护理交接的工具,有助于教育工作者、主管和临床护士提供培训、持续评估和反馈,以提高交接质量。关键词:切换;可靠性;效度;护士
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elder abuse. Construction of core Competence Index System for nursing emergency personnel in infectious disease emergencies——thinking on nursing emergency rescue based on COVID-19 epidemic Heat reactions. A qualitative study on the cognition of the first group of nurses to protect against instrumentrelated stress injury in the novel coronavirus pneumonia Opportunity for service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1