Is Kindergarten Ability Group Placement Biased? New Data, New Methods, New Answers.

IF 3.5 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH American Educational Research Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-13 DOI:10.3102/00028312211061410
Paul T von Hippel, Ana P Cañedo
{"title":"Is Kindergarten Ability Group Placement Biased? New Data, New Methods, New Answers.","authors":"Paul T von Hippel, Ana P Cañedo","doi":"10.3102/00028312211061410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Half of kindergarten teachers split children into higher and lower ability groups for reading or math. In national data, we predicted kindergarten ability group placement using linear and ordinal logistic regression with classroom fixed effects. In fall, test scores were the best predictors of group placement, but there was bias favoring girls, high-SES (socioeconomic status) children, and Asian Americans, who received higher placements than their scores alone would predict. Net of SES, there was no bias against placing black children in higher groups. By spring, one third of kindergartners moved groups, and high-SES children moved up more than their score gains alone would predict. Teacher-reported behaviors (e.g., attentiveness, approaches to learning) helped explain girls' higher placements, but did little to explain the higher placements of Asian American and high-SES children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48375,"journal":{"name":"American Educational Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211061410","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Half of kindergarten teachers split children into higher and lower ability groups for reading or math. In national data, we predicted kindergarten ability group placement using linear and ordinal logistic regression with classroom fixed effects. In fall, test scores were the best predictors of group placement, but there was bias favoring girls, high-SES (socioeconomic status) children, and Asian Americans, who received higher placements than their scores alone would predict. Net of SES, there was no bias against placing black children in higher groups. By spring, one third of kindergartners moved groups, and high-SES children moved up more than their score gains alone would predict. Teacher-reported behaviors (e.g., attentiveness, approaches to learning) helped explain girls' higher placements, but did little to explain the higher placements of Asian American and high-SES children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿园能力分组安排是否有偏差?新数据、新方法、新答案。
半数幼儿园教师将儿童分成阅读或数学能力较高和较低的小组。在全国数据中,我们使用带有教室固定效应的线性和序数逻辑回归预测了幼儿园能力组的分组情况。在秋季,考试分数是预测分组情况的最佳指标,但存在偏向于女孩、高社会经济地位(SES)儿童和亚裔美国人的情况,他们得到的分组比单凭分数预测的要高。除社会经济地位外,黑人儿童并没有被分到更高的组别。到了春季,三分之一的幼儿园学生转到了其他组别,高社会经济地位儿童的升学率高于他们的分数升幅。教师报告的行为(如专注力、学习方法)有助于解释女孩被分到较高组别,但对亚裔美国人和高社会经济地位儿童被分到较高组别几乎没有解释作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Educational Research Journal
American Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) is the flagship journal of the American Educational Research Association, featuring articles that advance the empirical, theoretical, and methodological understanding of education and learning. It publishes original peer-reviewed analyses that span the field of education research across all subfields and disciplines and all levels of analysis. It also encourages submissions across all levels of education throughout the life span and all forms of learning. AERJ welcomes submissions of the highest quality, reflecting a wide range of perspectives, topics, contexts, and methods, including interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary work.
期刊最新文献
Teacher-Student Race Match and Identification for Discretionary Educational Services The Mismatch Between World Bank Actions and the Decentralization of Educational Systems in LMICs Invisible Policy Brokers: The Political Roles of Interpreters in Educational Policy Negotiations With Language Minoritized Mothers Polarization, Partisan Sorting, and the Politics of Education The Role and Influence of Exclusively Online Degree Programs in Higher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1