Regaining Control of the National Security Establishment

R. Repetto
{"title":"Regaining Control of the National Security Establishment","authors":"R. Repetto","doi":"10.1080/05775132.2023.2185395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To justify its enormous cost, the defense sector promotes China as a deadly military threat, noneother being available This is a potentially fatal error. The Biden administration should recognize China’s sphere of influence and strengthen control over the national security establishment. Like all other government agencies, the national security agencies fight relentlessly to defend their programs, prerogatives and budgets. To that end, they use the world’s largest public relations budget, a flotilla of supporting think tanks, associations, institutes and columnists, and an army of defense industry lobbyists. Despite having never clearly won a war since World War II (not counting the farcical invasion of Grenada) and having clearly lost at least two despite a seemingly overwhelming advantage of force (Vietnam, Afghanistan and arguably Iraq), the military nonetheless has been so spectacularly successful in its political mission that we now spend more on the military than do all other countries combined – an incredible eight hundred and sixteen billion dollars per year.","PeriodicalId":88850,"journal":{"name":"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)","volume":"10 1","pages":"23 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2023.2185395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract To justify its enormous cost, the defense sector promotes China as a deadly military threat, noneother being available This is a potentially fatal error. The Biden administration should recognize China’s sphere of influence and strengthen control over the national security establishment. Like all other government agencies, the national security agencies fight relentlessly to defend their programs, prerogatives and budgets. To that end, they use the world’s largest public relations budget, a flotilla of supporting think tanks, associations, institutes and columnists, and an army of defense industry lobbyists. Despite having never clearly won a war since World War II (not counting the farcical invasion of Grenada) and having clearly lost at least two despite a seemingly overwhelming advantage of force (Vietnam, Afghanistan and arguably Iraq), the military nonetheless has been so spectacularly successful in its political mission that we now spend more on the military than do all other countries combined – an incredible eight hundred and sixteen billion dollars per year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新控制国家安全机构
为了证明其巨大的成本是合理的,国防部门将中国宣传为一个致命的军事威胁,没有其他可用的。这是一个潜在的致命错误。拜登政府应该承认中国的势力范围,加强对国家安全机构的控制。与所有其他政府机构一样,国家安全机构也在不遗余力地捍卫自己的项目、特权和预算。为此,他们动用了世界上最大的公共关系预算,一群支持他们的智库、协会、研究所和专栏作家,以及一支国防工业游说者大军。尽管自第二次世界大战以来从未明显地赢得过一场战争(不包括对格林纳达的滑稽入侵),并且在看似压倒性的武力优势下(越南、阿富汗和可以说是伊拉克),显然至少输掉了两场战争,但军队在其政治使命上取得了如此惊人的成功,以至于我们现在在军事上的花费比所有其他国家的总和还要多——令人难以置信的是,每年8160亿美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fiscal Stimulus Caused Only 1% of the 8% Rise in U.S. Inflation Institutions as Instruments of Social Welfare “Not a Thing” Seven Legal Reasons the Federal “Debt Ceiling” is Null & Void John Maynard Keynes Narrates the Great Depression: His Reports to the Philips Electronics Firm Notice of duplicate publication: “Globalization and the Labor Market: An Economic Approach.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1