Pain parameters for buffered and non-buffered anesthetic injections in children undergoing dental procedures

Theodora Erlin Puspitasari, Iwan Ahmad Musnamirwan, Kirana Lina Gunawan, Meirina Gartika
{"title":"Pain parameters for buffered and non-buffered anesthetic injections in children undergoing dental procedures","authors":"Theodora Erlin Puspitasari, Iwan Ahmad Musnamirwan, Kirana Lina Gunawan, Meirina Gartika","doi":"10.20473/j.djmkg.v56.i1.p58-62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dental procedures, such as injections, usually cause pain and make children uncomfortable and uncooperative. One approach for reducing pain is the use of buffered anesthetics. Purpose: The research objective was to assess the pain parameters between buffered and non-buffered anesthetic injections, based on oxygen saturation, pulse rate, and the self-reporting of pain by the children. Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental, with purposive sampling of 19 children. Pain parameters, based on oxygen saturation and pulse rate, were measured using a pulse oximeter. The self-reporting of pain used the Wong–Baker FACES® pain rating scale. Statistical analysis used a t-test and Mann–Whitney test with P < 0.01 taken as statistically significant. Results: The results showed a significant difference in oxygen saturation before and after the injection of buffered and non-buffered anesthetics (P = 0.0002). Delivering the buffered anesthetics were reported to be less painful than non-buffered anesthetics. The oxygen saturation and pulse rate were inversely proportional to the self-reporting of pain in children. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between oxygen saturation (P = 0.5) and pulse rate (P = 0.4886) in those receiving buffered and non-buffered anesthetics. However, there was a significant difference in the self-reporting of pain between the two groups (P = 0.00000262). Conclusion: Pain parameters could be measured physiologically and psychologically. This research concludes that physiologically, there was no difference in pain parameters, based on oxygen saturation and children’s pulse rate. Psychologically, there was a difference in the self-reporting of pain; 14 children reported that delivering the buffered anesthetic was painless.","PeriodicalId":11034,"journal":{"name":"Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)","volume":"359 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v56.i1.p58-62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dental procedures, such as injections, usually cause pain and make children uncomfortable and uncooperative. One approach for reducing pain is the use of buffered anesthetics. Purpose: The research objective was to assess the pain parameters between buffered and non-buffered anesthetic injections, based on oxygen saturation, pulse rate, and the self-reporting of pain by the children. Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental, with purposive sampling of 19 children. Pain parameters, based on oxygen saturation and pulse rate, were measured using a pulse oximeter. The self-reporting of pain used the Wong–Baker FACES® pain rating scale. Statistical analysis used a t-test and Mann–Whitney test with P < 0.01 taken as statistically significant. Results: The results showed a significant difference in oxygen saturation before and after the injection of buffered and non-buffered anesthetics (P = 0.0002). Delivering the buffered anesthetics were reported to be less painful than non-buffered anesthetics. The oxygen saturation and pulse rate were inversely proportional to the self-reporting of pain in children. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between oxygen saturation (P = 0.5) and pulse rate (P = 0.4886) in those receiving buffered and non-buffered anesthetics. However, there was a significant difference in the self-reporting of pain between the two groups (P = 0.00000262). Conclusion: Pain parameters could be measured physiologically and psychologically. This research concludes that physiologically, there was no difference in pain parameters, based on oxygen saturation and children’s pulse rate. Psychologically, there was a difference in the self-reporting of pain; 14 children reported that delivering the buffered anesthetic was painless.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童牙科手术中缓冲和非缓冲麻醉注射的疼痛参数
背景:牙科手术,如注射,通常会引起疼痛,使儿童不舒服和不合作。减轻疼痛的一种方法是使用缓冲麻醉剂。目的:研究目的是评估缓冲和非缓冲麻醉注射之间的疼痛参数,基于血氧饱和度、脉搏率和儿童自我报告的疼痛。方法:采用准实验研究方法,目的抽样19例。使用脉搏血氧仪测量基于血氧饱和度和脉搏率的疼痛参数。疼痛自我报告采用Wong-Baker FACES®疼痛评定量表。统计学分析采用t检验和Mann-Whitney检验,以P < 0.01为差异有统计学意义。结果:缓缓冲麻醉剂与非缓缓冲麻醉剂注射前后血氧饱和度差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0002)。据报道,使用缓冲麻醉剂比使用非缓冲麻醉剂疼痛更少。血氧饱和度和脉搏率与儿童自述疼痛程度成反比。经统计学分析,两组患者的血氧饱和度(P = 0.5)和脉搏率(P = 0.4886)差异无统计学意义。然而,两组患者自我报告的疼痛程度有显著差异(P = 0.00000262)。结论:疼痛参数可以在生理和心理上进行测量。本研究得出的结论是,在生理上,基于血氧饱和度和儿童脉搏率,疼痛参数没有差异。从心理上讲,自我报告疼痛的情况有所不同;14名儿童报告说,给予缓冲麻醉剂是无痛的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pengaruh Musik Instrumental terhadap Kecemasan Pasien pada Tindakan Perawatan Gigi dan Mulut Peran Prostodonsia dalam Identifikasi Manusia: Aspek Terlupakan dalam Odontologi Forensik Relationship between Tooth Brushing Behavior and Dental Caries in Children at 27 Sungai Sapih Public Elementary School Kuranji, Padang City Gambaran Performed Treatment Index (PTI) pada Mahasiswa Profesi PSPDG di RSGM Universitas Sam Ratulangi Prevalensi Maloklusi pada Anak Usia 9-12 Tahun di Daerah Pesisir Kota Manado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1