The‎ Influence of Attraction Effect on Hiring Decisions: Does Experience Matters?‎

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2020-12-21 DOI:10.31580/jrp.v2i3.1726
Aqbal Hafiz Izuddin Abd Hamid, Alizi Alias Hafiz Izuddin Abd Hamid
{"title":"The‎ Influence of Attraction Effect on Hiring Decisions: Does Experience Matters?‎","authors":"Aqbal Hafiz Izuddin Abd Hamid, Alizi Alias Hafiz Izuddin Abd Hamid","doi":"10.31580/jrp.v2i3.1726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence suggests that the contextual factor of attraction effects such as decoy and phantom candidates affect the task of choosing a single job candidate from a small set of comparable finalists. Nevertheless, the number of studies of the attraction effect on the job-finalist choice is relatively small and bound to methodological gaps (i.e., vulnerable to invariant sample and individuals’ differences). The present study examined the influence of decoy and phantom candidates on job-finalist choice as well as differences of such influence based on participants’ background. By using a within-subject, experimental design, 98 participants of different backgrounds (i.e., personnel selection workers and personnel selection students) were recruited to play the roles of hiring managers in three simulated employee selection scenarios. Results from McNemar’s chi-square revealed the following: (i) participants tend to choose the target candidate in decoy condition over control condition, (ii) participants tend to choose the target candidate in phantom condition over control condition and (iii) no difference in the number of participants who chose the target candidate in decoy and phantom conditions. Besides, results from further analysis on participants’ backgrounds showed: (i) the effect of a decoy candidate is significant among students but not among workers (ii) the effect of phantom candidate is not significant among both workers and students, and (iii) the difference between the effects of decoy and phantom candidates is significant among workers but not among students. The implications of these findings were discussed, and recommendations for future research are provided.","PeriodicalId":51771,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31580/jrp.v2i3.1726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the contextual factor of attraction effects such as decoy and phantom candidates affect the task of choosing a single job candidate from a small set of comparable finalists. Nevertheless, the number of studies of the attraction effect on the job-finalist choice is relatively small and bound to methodological gaps (i.e., vulnerable to invariant sample and individuals’ differences). The present study examined the influence of decoy and phantom candidates on job-finalist choice as well as differences of such influence based on participants’ background. By using a within-subject, experimental design, 98 participants of different backgrounds (i.e., personnel selection workers and personnel selection students) were recruited to play the roles of hiring managers in three simulated employee selection scenarios. Results from McNemar’s chi-square revealed the following: (i) participants tend to choose the target candidate in decoy condition over control condition, (ii) participants tend to choose the target candidate in phantom condition over control condition and (iii) no difference in the number of participants who chose the target candidate in decoy and phantom conditions. Besides, results from further analysis on participants’ backgrounds showed: (i) the effect of a decoy candidate is significant among students but not among workers (ii) the effect of phantom candidate is not significant among both workers and students, and (iii) the difference between the effects of decoy and phantom candidates is significant among workers but not among students. The implications of these findings were discussed, and recommendations for future research are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸引力效应对招聘决策的影响:经验重要吗?‎
有证据表明,吸引效应的背景因素,如诱饵和虚幻候选人,会影响从一小群可比较的最终候选人中选择一个候选人的任务。然而,关于吸引力对工作最终选择的影响的研究数量相对较少,并且受到方法差距的限制(即容易受到不变样本和个体差异的影响)。本研究考察了诱饵候选人和虚幻候选人对就业最终选择的影响,以及这种影响在不同背景下的差异。采用主体内实验设计,招募了98名不同背景的被试(即人事选拔工作者和人事选拔学生)在三个模拟的员工选拔场景中扮演招聘经理的角色。McNemar卡方分析结果显示:(1)受试者在诱饵条件下比在对照条件下更倾向于选择目标候选人;(2)受试者在幻觉条件下比在对照条件下更倾向于选择目标候选人;(3)受试者在诱饵条件和幻觉条件下选择目标候选人的人数没有差异。此外,对被试背景的进一步分析结果表明:(1)“诱饵候选人”对学生的影响显著,而对工人的影响不显著;(2)“幻影候选人”对工人和学生的影响不显著;(3)“诱饵候选人”和“幻影候选人”对工人的影响显著,对学生的影响不显著。讨论了这些发现的意义,并对未来的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The Role of Biological Differences in Sexual Self-Concept and Mental Health in Homosexual and Heterosexual Women Effect of Job Crafting on Faculty’s Job Satisfaction and Performance; The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support. The Impact of Academic Self-efficacy, E-learning Adoption and Academic Motivation on Self-rated Academic Performance of University Students Are You Bored With Your Skincare Brand? The Need for Variety and Brand Switching Intention on Skincare Products A Measure of Romantic Love: The Psychometric Properties of the Love Bank Inventory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1