Election boycott in a hybrid regime: The case of 2020 parliamentary elections in Serbia

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE New Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-04-13 DOI:10.1177/2336825X211009106
D. Bursać, Dušan Vučićević
{"title":"Election boycott in a hybrid regime: The case of 2020 parliamentary elections in Serbia","authors":"D. Bursać, Dušan Vučićević","doi":"10.1177/2336825X211009106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2020 elections in Serbia were held on 21st of June, as the first elections in Europe since the outbreak of coronavirus pandemic. The pre-electoral period was marked by the announcement of boycott from opposition, followed by a number of attempts of ruling party to mitigate the potential negative effects. The decision of opposition to restrain from participation came as a response to the long-term accusations of heavily biased electoral and media conditions, which culminated in EU-mediated (but largely unsuccessful) roundtable talks in 2019. On a larger scale, the administration headed by the President Aleksandar Vučić is becoming increasingly authoritarian, with several indices now classifying Serbia as a hybrid regime. As expected, the elections brought a convincing victory to Vučić’s Serbian Progressive Party, which won 188 out of 250 seats. Despite the overwhelming triumph, government was formed more than four months later. This paper is contributing to the literature on actors’ strategies in hybrid regimes. Although only short-term effects of the boycott could be assessed, the 2020 elections in Serbia demonstrate that legitimacy of the regime cannot be endangered if the opposition is not supported by international actors, and moreover, that the election results have only strengthened the regime.","PeriodicalId":42556,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives","volume":"19 1","pages":"187 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X211009106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The 2020 elections in Serbia were held on 21st of June, as the first elections in Europe since the outbreak of coronavirus pandemic. The pre-electoral period was marked by the announcement of boycott from opposition, followed by a number of attempts of ruling party to mitigate the potential negative effects. The decision of opposition to restrain from participation came as a response to the long-term accusations of heavily biased electoral and media conditions, which culminated in EU-mediated (but largely unsuccessful) roundtable talks in 2019. On a larger scale, the administration headed by the President Aleksandar Vučić is becoming increasingly authoritarian, with several indices now classifying Serbia as a hybrid regime. As expected, the elections brought a convincing victory to Vučić’s Serbian Progressive Party, which won 188 out of 250 seats. Despite the overwhelming triumph, government was formed more than four months later. This paper is contributing to the literature on actors’ strategies in hybrid regimes. Although only short-term effects of the boycott could be assessed, the 2020 elections in Serbia demonstrate that legitimacy of the regime cannot be endangered if the opposition is not supported by international actors, and moreover, that the election results have only strengthened the regime.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合政权中的选举抵制:塞尔维亚2020年议会选举的案例
塞尔维亚2020年选举于6月21日举行,这是欧洲自冠状病毒大流行爆发以来的首次选举。在选举前的一段时间里,反对派宣布抵制选举,随后执政党多次尝试减轻潜在的负面影响。反对派决定限制参与,是对长期以来对选举和媒体条件存在严重偏见的指责的回应,这种指责最终导致了2019年欧盟调解的圆桌会议(但基本上没有成功)。在更大的范围内,由Aleksandar vu伊奇总统领导的政府正变得越来越专制,几个指标现在将塞尔维亚归类为混合政权。正如预期的那样,vu伊奇的塞尔维亚进步党在选举中取得了令人信服的胜利,赢得了250个席位中的188个。尽管取得了压倒性的胜利,但政府在四个多月后才成立。本文对研究混合制度下行为者策略的文献有贡献。虽然只能评估抵制的短期影响,但塞尔维亚2020年的选举表明,如果反对派没有得到国际行动者的支持,政权的合法性就不会受到威胁,而且,选举结果只会加强政权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Perspectives
New Perspectives POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: New Perspectives is an academic journal that seeks to provide interdisciplinary insight into the politics and international relations of Central and Eastern Europe. New Perspectives is published by the Institute of International Relations Prague.
期刊最新文献
Informal institutionalization in modern Ukraine: Technological aspect Geopolitics in the ESC: Comparing Russia’s and Ukraine’s use of cultural diplomacy in the Eurovision Song Contest Opting out of the ‘near abroad’ and moving towards eurointegration: A postfunctionalist analysis of Ukraine’s regional integration dynamics in the early 2010s Status-seeking with a negative image – The changing position of Visegrád countries in the international community between 2004 and 2020 Editorial: Communication, power and creolization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1