Implementation of a Comprehensive Hip Fracture Care Program in a Community Hospital Setting

J. Ferrell, D. Bowden, Cindy Tong, K. Etter, R. Bruce
{"title":"Implementation of a Comprehensive Hip Fracture Care Program in a Community Hospital Setting","authors":"J. Ferrell, D. Bowden, Cindy Tong, K. Etter, R. Bruce","doi":"10.29011/2575-9760.001303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hip fractures are common and costly in the elderly population, often contributing to loss of function and independence. Prompt surgical care may improve clinical and economic outcomes. Materials and Methods: We implemented a protocol-driven care program focused on minimizing time spent immobilized awaiting surgery and streamlining the care pathway for hip fracture. The Hip Fracture Care Program (HFCP) was implemented in a single facility in the Willis Knighton Health System. Time to surgery, length of stay, and cost of length of stay were compared before and after the intervention, utilizing an interrupted time series analysis to account for background trends. Results: One-hundred and sixty patients received HFCP care for acute femur fracture requiring surgical fixation. Compared to 379 patients serving as the pre-implementation comparison group, patients receiving the HFCP intervention were more likely to have minor disease severity and mortality risk. Bivariate analysis demonstrated HFCP was associated with a reduced mean length of stay (from 5.99 to 5.33, p=0.016). Interrupted time series analysis adjusting for disease severity showed no statistically significant difference in length of stay or time to surgery after implementation of the intervention. Mean overall cost based on length of stay was reduced in the post-intervention period, but results were not statistically significant. Discussion: Early cost savings are promising, and program refinement may translate to additional utilization improvements and implications for value-based health care delivery. Conclusions: A standardized care program can be successfully implemented in a community hospital. The program led to nonsignificant reductions in overall LOS and estimated cost savings attributable to LOS reductions. Further efforts to evaluate the effect on complications and other patient-centered outcomes are needed.","PeriodicalId":101237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2575-9760.001303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hip fractures are common and costly in the elderly population, often contributing to loss of function and independence. Prompt surgical care may improve clinical and economic outcomes. Materials and Methods: We implemented a protocol-driven care program focused on minimizing time spent immobilized awaiting surgery and streamlining the care pathway for hip fracture. The Hip Fracture Care Program (HFCP) was implemented in a single facility in the Willis Knighton Health System. Time to surgery, length of stay, and cost of length of stay were compared before and after the intervention, utilizing an interrupted time series analysis to account for background trends. Results: One-hundred and sixty patients received HFCP care for acute femur fracture requiring surgical fixation. Compared to 379 patients serving as the pre-implementation comparison group, patients receiving the HFCP intervention were more likely to have minor disease severity and mortality risk. Bivariate analysis demonstrated HFCP was associated with a reduced mean length of stay (from 5.99 to 5.33, p=0.016). Interrupted time series analysis adjusting for disease severity showed no statistically significant difference in length of stay or time to surgery after implementation of the intervention. Mean overall cost based on length of stay was reduced in the post-intervention period, but results were not statistically significant. Discussion: Early cost savings are promising, and program refinement may translate to additional utilization improvements and implications for value-based health care delivery. Conclusions: A standardized care program can be successfully implemented in a community hospital. The program led to nonsignificant reductions in overall LOS and estimated cost savings attributable to LOS reductions. Further efforts to evaluate the effect on complications and other patient-centered outcomes are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区医院髋部骨折综合护理方案的实施
髋部骨折在老年人群中是常见且昂贵的,通常会导致功能和独立性的丧失。及时的手术治疗可以改善临床和经济结果。材料和方法:我们实施了一项协议驱动的护理计划,重点是减少髋部骨折患者等待手术的固定时间和简化护理途径。髋部骨折护理项目(HFCP)在威利斯·奈特卫生系统的单一设施中实施。比较干预前后的手术时间、住院时间和住院时间成本,利用中断时间序列分析来解释背景趋势。结果:160例需要手术固定的急性股骨骨折患者接受了HFCP治疗。与实施前对照组的379名患者相比,接受HFCP干预的患者更有可能出现轻微疾病严重程度和死亡风险。双变量分析表明,手足口病与平均住院时间缩短相关(从5.99到5.33,p=0.016)。调整疾病严重程度的中断时间序列分析显示,实施干预后,住院时间和手术时间没有统计学上的显著差异。基于住院时间的平均总成本在干预后降低,但结果没有统计学意义。讨论:早期的成本节约是有希望的,并且程序的细化可能转化为额外的利用改进和基于价值的医疗保健交付的含义。结论:标准化护理方案可在社区医院成功实施。该方案导致了总体成本损失的不显著减少,以及由于成本损失减少而估计的成本节约。需要进一步努力评估对并发症和其他以患者为中心的结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report of Mesenteric Ischemia After COVID-19 Vaccination Short Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Super Obese Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial The Intraoperative Finding of a Large Atrial Septum Defect Pre-Liver Transplantation: A Case Report Study on Preventive Intervention of Peri-knee Ecchymosis After Total Knee Replacement Late Primary B Cell Cerebral Lymphoma After Kidney Transplant: A Case Report and Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1