Catholicism in the Late Ming Dynasty and Ledgers of Merit and Demerit from the Perspective of Weber’s Sociology of Religion

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.1163/27726606-20220006
Tiefeng Shao
{"title":"Catholicism in the Late Ming Dynasty and Ledgers of Merit and Demerit from the Perspective of Weber’s Sociology of Religion","authors":"Tiefeng Shao","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20220006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n According to Weber’s sociology of religion, Catholic moral book-keeping exhibits a tendency to offset merit with demerit, while that of Puritanism reflects a systematic and rational formation of a believer’s ethical life. This paper aims to prove that this distinction of Weber’s could be used to explain the tension between Catholicism in the late Ming dynasty and the traditional Chinese ledgers of merit and demerit at that time. Catholicism in the late Ming regarded the practice of keeping ledgers as representing not knowing God, leading to arithmetical moral practices that could undermine the purity of morality. Instead, what it required of its believers was a constant confession that enabled them to form a systematic self-examination and practice. This self-understanding of Catholicism is consistent with Weber’s interpretation of the Jesuit methodology of salvation.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20220006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Weber’s sociology of religion, Catholic moral book-keeping exhibits a tendency to offset merit with demerit, while that of Puritanism reflects a systematic and rational formation of a believer’s ethical life. This paper aims to prove that this distinction of Weber’s could be used to explain the tension between Catholicism in the late Ming dynasty and the traditional Chinese ledgers of merit and demerit at that time. Catholicism in the late Ming regarded the practice of keeping ledgers as representing not knowing God, leading to arithmetical moral practices that could undermine the purity of morality. Instead, what it required of its believers was a constant confession that enabled them to form a systematic self-examination and practice. This self-understanding of Catholicism is consistent with Weber’s interpretation of the Jesuit methodology of salvation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从韦伯的《宗教社会学》看晚明天主教与《功过志》
根据韦伯的宗教社会学,天主教的道德记录表现出以德抵德的倾向,而清教的道德记录则反映了信徒道德生活的系统和理性的形成。本文旨在证明韦伯的这种区分可以用来解释明末天主教与当时中国传统的功过分类法之间的紧张关系。明末的天主教认为记账是不认识上帝的表现,导致了有损道德纯洁性的算术道德行为。相反,它对信徒的要求是不断的忏悔,使他们能够形成系统的自我检查和实践。这种对天主教的自我理解与韦伯对耶稣会救赎方法论的解释是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Theological Method of Chinese Theology in the Republican Era (1911–1949) “Merciful Substitution”: A Comparative-Theological Appraisal of George Hunsinger’s Philippians from an Evangelical Reformed Perspective The Influence of Renaissance Thought on Martin Luther’s View of Liberty Reconstruction of Humanist Criticism Based on the Revealed Theology of Relation Experiment of the World-Picture Logic Philosophy: Towards a Relational Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1