“Merciful Substitution”: A Comparative-Theological Appraisal of George Hunsinger’s Philippians from an Evangelical Reformed Perspective

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1163/27726606-20230017
S. Tseng
{"title":"“Merciful Substitution”: A Comparative-Theological Appraisal of George Hunsinger’s Philippians from an Evangelical Reformed Perspective","authors":"S. Tseng","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20230017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article consists of a comparative-theological appraisal of George Hunsinger’s Philippians in the Brazos Theological Commentary series. My aim is to bring the author’s constructive proposal of the doctrine of “merciful substitution” into dialogue with the evangelical notion of penal substitution. I will show that Hunsinger is largely in agreement with at least the wing of evangelicalism represented by followers of Geerhardus Vos like Richard Gaffin and G. K. Beale. I will present the case of John Owen and resort to the Canons of Dort to show that in this strain of evangelical theology, penal substitution describes only one aspect of the exchange of righteousness and guilt through participation. What evangelicals can learn from Hunsinger’s commentary, I will argue, is his relentless effort to formulate the doctrine of substitutionary atonement within an explicitly Nicene-Chalcedonian framework.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"547 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20230017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article consists of a comparative-theological appraisal of George Hunsinger’s Philippians in the Brazos Theological Commentary series. My aim is to bring the author’s constructive proposal of the doctrine of “merciful substitution” into dialogue with the evangelical notion of penal substitution. I will show that Hunsinger is largely in agreement with at least the wing of evangelicalism represented by followers of Geerhardus Vos like Richard Gaffin and G. K. Beale. I will present the case of John Owen and resort to the Canons of Dort to show that in this strain of evangelical theology, penal substitution describes only one aspect of the exchange of righteousness and guilt through participation. What evangelicals can learn from Hunsinger’s commentary, I will argue, is his relentless effort to formulate the doctrine of substitutionary atonement within an explicitly Nicene-Chalcedonian framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“仁慈的替代”:从福音改革宗的角度对亨辛格《腓立比书》的比较神学评价
本文对《布拉索神学评论》系列丛书中乔治·亨辛格的《腓立比书》进行比较神学评价。我的目的是将作者关于“仁慈替代”教义的建设性建议与福音派关于刑罚替代的概念进行对话。我将表明,亨辛格至少在很大程度上与格尔哈德斯·沃斯(Geerhardus Vos)的追随者,如理查德·加芬(Richard Gaffin)和g·k·比尔(G. K. Beale)所代表的福音派是一致的。我将以约翰·欧文为例,并借助《波特正典》来说明,在福音派神学的这个流派中,刑罚替代只描述了通过参与来交换正义和罪恶的一个方面。我认为,福音派可以从亨辛格的注释中学到的是,他在明确的尼西亚-迦克墩框架内,不懈地努力制定替代赎罪的教义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Theological Method of Chinese Theology in the Republican Era (1911–1949) “Merciful Substitution”: A Comparative-Theological Appraisal of George Hunsinger’s Philippians from an Evangelical Reformed Perspective The Influence of Renaissance Thought on Martin Luther’s View of Liberty Reconstruction of Humanist Criticism Based on the Revealed Theology of Relation Experiment of the World-Picture Logic Philosophy: Towards a Relational Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1