Coherence in Non-technical Summaries of European Central Bank Financial Reports

A. Hill-Madsen, Helle Dam-Jensen
{"title":"Coherence in Non-technical Summaries of European Central Bank Financial Reports","authors":"A. Hill-Madsen, Helle Dam-Jensen","doi":"10.24989/fs.v44i1-2.1856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Positioned on the intersection between the research fields of text linguistics, genre studies and expert-lay communication, this article investigates how and to what extent coherence is achieved in a specific type of summary writing, viz. so-called non-technical summaries (NTS) of financial/economic reports published by the European Central Bank. The investigation is motivated by the observation that while it is incumbent on the writer of any type of document to ensure coherence in his/her product, the special circumstances surrounding summary writing (the fact that summaries are typically required to condense large amounts of information into very limited space) may militate against a sufficient degree of coherence in such texts. Relying to a large extent on the so-called Cohesive Harmony Analysis framework provided by Systemic-Functional Linguistics, the investigation found that while the texts do succeed in employing cohesive devices in such ways and to such an extent that a clear potential for coherence is present, they fail to exploit the potential in a way that makes them properly coherent.","PeriodicalId":41240,"journal":{"name":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v44i1-2.1856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positioned on the intersection between the research fields of text linguistics, genre studies and expert-lay communication, this article investigates how and to what extent coherence is achieved in a specific type of summary writing, viz. so-called non-technical summaries (NTS) of financial/economic reports published by the European Central Bank. The investigation is motivated by the observation that while it is incumbent on the writer of any type of document to ensure coherence in his/her product, the special circumstances surrounding summary writing (the fact that summaries are typically required to condense large amounts of information into very limited space) may militate against a sufficient degree of coherence in such texts. Relying to a large extent on the so-called Cohesive Harmony Analysis framework provided by Systemic-Functional Linguistics, the investigation found that while the texts do succeed in employing cohesive devices in such ways and to such an extent that a clear potential for coherence is present, they fail to exploit the potential in a way that makes them properly coherent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲中央银行财务报告非技术摘要的一致性
本文定位于文本语言学、体裁研究和专家-外行交流研究领域的交叉点,研究了在特定类型的摘要写作中如何以及在多大程度上实现连贯性,即所谓的非技术摘要(NTS)由欧洲中央银行发布的金融/经济报告。调查的动机是观察到,虽然任何类型文件的作者都有责任确保其产品的连贯性,但撰写摘要的特殊情况(通常需要摘要将大量信息浓缩到非常有限的空间中)可能会妨碍此类文本的足够程度的连贯性。在很大程度上依靠系统功能语言学提供的所谓的衔接和谐分析框架,调查发现,虽然文本确实成功地以这种方式使用衔接手段,并且在某种程度上存在明显的连贯潜力,但它们未能利用这种潜力使它们适当地连贯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Funktionen von Unsicherheitsthematisierungen in journalistischen Medien The Impact of Communicating Advocacy and Scientific Uncertainty on a Scientist’s Trustworthiness Corpus Approaches to Analysing Uncertainty and Ignorance in Academic Discourse Konstitution von Nichtwissen und Unsicherheit im Sprachgebrauch – ein programmatischer Systematisierungsversuch Beraten und Prognostizieren. Unsicheres Wissen in der institutionellen vs. der massenmedialen Politikberatung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1