Time and well¬being

R. Levine
{"title":"Time and well¬being","authors":"R. Levine","doi":"10.11606/issn.2446-7693i2p1-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of temporal experience—time use, conceptions of time and temporal norms—on happiness and well-being and suggests public policies to enhance these experiences. First, it reviews literature concerning the interrelationships of time, money and happiness. Second, it reviews data and issues concerning the use of work and non-work hours around the world. Third, it describes a broader range of temporal issues to be considered in policymaking decisions, e.g. clock versus event time-keeping, monochronic versus polychronic approaches, the definition of wasted time, the pace of life, and temporal orientation. Finally, suggestions are of ered for the formulation of time-use policies intended to increase individual and collective happiness. It is a virtual truism that the way we use our time is the way we live our lives. Our time is our most valuable possession. Much of this time, however, is controlled by others, ranging from our employers to our closest family members. It is also clear that there are profound dif erences-- individual, socio-economic, cultural and national--in the degree to which people hold control over their own time (e.g., LEVINE, 1997; LEE, et al., 2007). It may be argued that public policies are needed to protect the “temporal rights” of individuals, particularly those who are most vulnerable to exploitation. This paper was sparked by an ambitious large-scale project in which I had the opportunity to participate. The project was initiated in the Spring of 2012 following a United Nations resolution, adopted unanimously by the General Assembly, placing “happiness” on the global agenda. The nation of Bhutan was asked to convene an interdisciplinary group of international “experts” to craft recommendations for policies to raise worldwide happiness; more specifically, to develop a “new paradigm for world development.” Bhutan, a small, landlocked, relatively poor Himalayan nation, was chosen for this task because of its pioneering Gross National Happiness (GNH) project. “Progress,” the GNH designers declared, “should be viewed not only through the lens of economics but also from spiritual, social, cultural and ecological perspectives.” Happiness and development, in other words, depend on more than growth and the accumulation of money. England, Canada and other countries and country-level organizations have subsequently followed Bhutan’s lead and established GNH measures of their own (LEVINE, 2013). One of the nine core domains of Bhutan’s GNH index is “time use,” which comprised my section of the report. The present paper draws heavily on that report and the insights that research of ered me. I will address four major sets of issues: I. The inter-relationships of time, money and happiness. Most importantly, what is the relevance of time use to well-being and happiness? II. Time Use: Work hour issues and policies. III. Other temporal factors that need to be considered when formulating policies to increase happiness. IV. Suggestions for policymaking: The call for a “Temporal Bill of Rights.”","PeriodicalId":34722,"journal":{"name":"Revista Lusofona de Estudos Culturais","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Lusofona de Estudos Culturais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2446-7693i2p1-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of temporal experience—time use, conceptions of time and temporal norms—on happiness and well-being and suggests public policies to enhance these experiences. First, it reviews literature concerning the interrelationships of time, money and happiness. Second, it reviews data and issues concerning the use of work and non-work hours around the world. Third, it describes a broader range of temporal issues to be considered in policymaking decisions, e.g. clock versus event time-keeping, monochronic versus polychronic approaches, the definition of wasted time, the pace of life, and temporal orientation. Finally, suggestions are of ered for the formulation of time-use policies intended to increase individual and collective happiness. It is a virtual truism that the way we use our time is the way we live our lives. Our time is our most valuable possession. Much of this time, however, is controlled by others, ranging from our employers to our closest family members. It is also clear that there are profound dif erences-- individual, socio-economic, cultural and national--in the degree to which people hold control over their own time (e.g., LEVINE, 1997; LEE, et al., 2007). It may be argued that public policies are needed to protect the “temporal rights” of individuals, particularly those who are most vulnerable to exploitation. This paper was sparked by an ambitious large-scale project in which I had the opportunity to participate. The project was initiated in the Spring of 2012 following a United Nations resolution, adopted unanimously by the General Assembly, placing “happiness” on the global agenda. The nation of Bhutan was asked to convene an interdisciplinary group of international “experts” to craft recommendations for policies to raise worldwide happiness; more specifically, to develop a “new paradigm for world development.” Bhutan, a small, landlocked, relatively poor Himalayan nation, was chosen for this task because of its pioneering Gross National Happiness (GNH) project. “Progress,” the GNH designers declared, “should be viewed not only through the lens of economics but also from spiritual, social, cultural and ecological perspectives.” Happiness and development, in other words, depend on more than growth and the accumulation of money. England, Canada and other countries and country-level organizations have subsequently followed Bhutan’s lead and established GNH measures of their own (LEVINE, 2013). One of the nine core domains of Bhutan’s GNH index is “time use,” which comprised my section of the report. The present paper draws heavily on that report and the insights that research of ered me. I will address four major sets of issues: I. The inter-relationships of time, money and happiness. Most importantly, what is the relevance of time use to well-being and happiness? II. Time Use: Work hour issues and policies. III. Other temporal factors that need to be considered when formulating policies to increase happiness. IV. Suggestions for policymaking: The call for a “Temporal Bill of Rights.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间和幸福
本文研究了时间体验——时间使用、时间概念和时间规范——对幸福和福祉的影响,并提出了加强这些体验的公共政策建议。首先,它回顾了有关时间、金钱和幸福之间相互关系的文献。其次,它审查了世界各地有关工作和非工作时间使用的数据和问题。第三,它描述了政策制定决策中需要考虑的更广泛的时间问题,例如时钟与事件计时、单时间与多时间方法、浪费时间的定义、生活节奏和时间取向。最后,对时间利用政策的制定提出了建议,旨在提高个人和集体的幸福感。我们利用时间的方式就是我们生活的方式,这几乎是不言自明的。时间是我们最宝贵的财产。然而,大部分时间是由其他人控制的,从我们的雇主到我们最亲密的家人。同样清楚的是,在人们控制自己时间的程度上,存在着深刻的差异——个人的、社会经济的、文化的和国家的差异(例如LEVINE, 1997;LEE等人,2007)。有人可能会说,需要有公共政策来保护个人的“世俗权利”,特别是那些最容易受到剥削的人。这篇论文是由我有机会参与的一个雄心勃勃的大型项目引发的。2012年春天,联合国大会一致通过了一项决议,将“幸福”列入全球议程,随后该项目启动。不丹被要求召集一个跨学科的国际“专家”小组,为提高全球幸福水平的政策提出建议;更具体地说,是建立一个“世界发展的新范式”。不丹是一个相对贫穷的小内陆喜马拉雅国家,因为其开创性的国民幸福总值(GNH)项目而被选为这项任务。“进步,”GNH的设计者宣称,“不仅应该从经济的角度来看,还应该从精神、社会、文化和生态的角度来看。”换句话说,幸福和发展不仅仅取决于经济增长和金钱积累。英国、加拿大和其他国家和国家级组织随后效仿不丹,建立了自己的GNH衡量标准(LEVINE, 2013)。不丹国民总收入指数的九个核心领域之一是“时间利用”,这也是我在报告中所写的部分。本文在很大程度上借鉴了该报告以及该研究为我提供的见解。我将讨论四个主要问题:1 .时间、金钱和幸福的相互关系。最重要的是,时间的使用与幸福和快乐有什么关系?2时间利用:工作时间问题和政策。3在制定提高幸福感的政策时需要考虑的其他时间因素。四、政策制定建议:呼吁制定“临时权利法案”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
O viés de gênero na neurociência comportamental A paralisia do sono no folclore brasileiro e em outras culturas Tempos Fantásticos e Onde Habitam: O Oxímoro do Efêmero Eterno A divulgação científica do canal Nerdologia no YouTube O sexo do cérebro: entre ciência e ideologia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1