(Dis)aligning for improving mutual understanding in talk-in-interaction

Q2 Arts and Humanities Revue Francaise de Linguistique Appliquee Pub Date : 2017-11-01 DOI:10.3917/RFLA.222.0053
R. Bertrand, A. Goujon
{"title":"(Dis)aligning for improving mutual understanding in talk-in-interaction","authors":"R. Bertrand, A. Goujon","doi":"10.3917/RFLA.222.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the mutual understanding phenomenon and its explicit marks in talk-in-interaction. Drawing on conversation literature, we attempt to enhance knowledge about understanding by linking it to the alignment concept. This allows us to shed light on the different levels of understanding required for the accomplishment of successful interaction. Feedback responses provided by recipients are one of the explicit marks for achieving understanding. However, we focus here on dispreferred responses that can be considered a cue of disalignment, i.e. a break in the activity in progress and a potential indicator of trouble in understanding. Using the Conversational Analysis framework, we show how and why recipients can disalign and to what extent the mutual understanding is impacted by this disalignment.","PeriodicalId":42780,"journal":{"name":"Revue Francaise de Linguistique Appliquee","volume":"72 1","pages":"53-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Francaise de Linguistique Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/RFLA.222.0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article deals with the mutual understanding phenomenon and its explicit marks in talk-in-interaction. Drawing on conversation literature, we attempt to enhance knowledge about understanding by linking it to the alignment concept. This allows us to shed light on the different levels of understanding required for the accomplishment of successful interaction. Feedback responses provided by recipients are one of the explicit marks for achieving understanding. However, we focus here on dispreferred responses that can be considered a cue of disalignment, i.e. a break in the activity in progress and a potential indicator of trouble in understanding. Using the Conversational Analysis framework, we show how and why recipients can disalign and to what extent the mutual understanding is impacted by this disalignment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(二)在互动交谈中增进相互理解
本文探讨了互动对话中的相互理解现象及其明显标志。借鉴对话文献,我们试图通过将理解与对齐概念联系起来来增强理解方面的知识。这使我们能够阐明完成成功交互所需的不同层次的理解。接受者提供的反馈反应是实现理解的明确标志之一。然而,我们在这里关注的是不受欢迎的反应,这些反应可以被认为是一种错位的暗示,即正在进行的活动中断和理解困难的潜在指标。使用会话分析框架,我们展示了接收者如何以及为什么会不一致,以及这种不一致在多大程度上影响了相互理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Évaluations, mesures ou classements ? Á propos des enquêtes PISA Á propos de la médiatisation du classement de Shanghai : l'apport de l'analyse du discours L’évaluation : une question centrale à propos des connaissances pédagogiques de contenu Évaluation de l'efficacité ou mesure de la satisfaction dans la formation professionnelle courte ? L’évaluation des formations professionnelles de l'enseignement supérieur à l’aune de leurs résultats d’insertion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1