Technological Advance, Social Fragmentation and Welfare

Steven J. Bosworth, D. Snower
{"title":"Technological Advance, Social Fragmentation and Welfare","authors":"Steven J. Bosworth, D. Snower","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3772083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper models the welfare consequences of social fragmentation arising from technological advance. We start from the premise that technological progress falls primarily on market-traded commodities rather than prosocial relationships, since the latter intrinsically require the expenditure of time and thus are less amenable to productivity increases. Since prosocial relationships require individuals to identify with others in their social group whereas marketable commodities are commonly the objects of social status comparisons, a tradeoff arises between in-group affiliation and inter-group status comparisons. People consequently narrow the bounds of their social groups, reducing their prosocial relationships and extending their status-seeking activities. As prosocial relationships generate positive externalities whereas status-seeking activities generate negative preference externalities, technological advance may lead to a particular type of “decoupling” of social welfare from material prosperity. Once the share of status goods in total production exceeds a crucial threshold, technological advance is shown to be welfare-reducing.","PeriodicalId":21855,"journal":{"name":"SSRN Electronic Journal","volume":"81 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN Electronic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3772083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper models the welfare consequences of social fragmentation arising from technological advance. We start from the premise that technological progress falls primarily on market-traded commodities rather than prosocial relationships, since the latter intrinsically require the expenditure of time and thus are less amenable to productivity increases. Since prosocial relationships require individuals to identify with others in their social group whereas marketable commodities are commonly the objects of social status comparisons, a tradeoff arises between in-group affiliation and inter-group status comparisons. People consequently narrow the bounds of their social groups, reducing their prosocial relationships and extending their status-seeking activities. As prosocial relationships generate positive externalities whereas status-seeking activities generate negative preference externalities, technological advance may lead to a particular type of “decoupling” of social welfare from material prosperity. Once the share of status goods in total production exceeds a crucial threshold, technological advance is shown to be welfare-reducing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术进步、社会分裂与福利
本文建立了由技术进步引起的社会分裂的福利后果模型。我们从一个前提出发,即技术进步主要发生在市场交易的商品上,而不是亲社会关系上,因为后者本质上需要花费时间,因此不太容易受到生产率提高的影响。由于亲社会关系要求个人认同其社会群体中的其他人,而可销售的商品通常是社会地位比较的对象,因此在群体内隶属关系和群体间地位比较之间产生了权衡。因此,人们缩小了社会群体的范围,减少了亲社会关系,扩大了寻求地位的活动。由于亲社会关系产生正外部性,而追求地位的活动产生负偏好外部性,技术进步可能导致社会福利与物质繁荣的一种特殊类型的“脱钩”。一旦地位商品在总生产中的份额超过了一个关键阈值,技术进步就会显示出减少福利的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Basic Economic and Welfare Aspects of Farm Technological Advance
IF 4.2 2区 经济学American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsPub Date : 1949-05-01 DOI: 10.2307/1232985
Earl O. Heady
Technological advance, social fragmentation and welfare
IF 0 4区 经济学Social Choice and WelfarePub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00355-023-01484-0
Steven J. Bosworth, Dennis J. Snower
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bailing out the Protester Ships of State and Empty Vessels: Critical Reflections on 'Territorial Status in International Law' Religious Expression and Exemptions in the Private Sector Workplace: Spotting Bias Reform, Not Revolution, is What is Needed Now for Yardstick Competition Influence of Psychological Exchange Rates (PER) on Forex Price Formation: Theory, Empirical, and Experimental Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1