Wissenschaftskommunikation im Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft, Politik und Medien: zur Aushandlung von Gesprächsnormen in Pressekonferenzen und Polit-Talkshows

Sina Lautenschläger, Lisa Rhein
{"title":"Wissenschaftskommunikation im Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft, Politik und Medien: zur Aushandlung von Gesprächsnormen in Pressekonferenzen und Polit-Talkshows","authors":"Sina Lautenschläger, Lisa Rhein","doi":"10.24989/fs.v44i1-2.2049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the beginning of the corona pandemic at the beginning of 2020, virologists have been present in the mass media and are often guests on (political) talk shows. Here, different discourse logics and norms meet, namely those of science, politics, and the media. In this area of conflict, discourse-pragmatic adjustments on the part of scientists occur. In this article, we investigate 1) how scientists establish themselves as epistemic authorities in the different formats and 2) how they try to enforce scientific discourse routines in media-mediated and politically framed discourses. As a basis of this empirical research, we compiled a corpus of press conferences organized by the Science Media Center Germany in Cologne and political talk shows of the public broadcasters in the period from March 2020 to April 2021. It turns out that the scientists behave in accordance with their scientific discourse norms and are hardly prepared to cross borders. The article aims to show in detail which strategies scientists use to hold on to their scientific discourse routines.","PeriodicalId":41240,"journal":{"name":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v44i1-2.2049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the beginning of the corona pandemic at the beginning of 2020, virologists have been present in the mass media and are often guests on (political) talk shows. Here, different discourse logics and norms meet, namely those of science, politics, and the media. In this area of conflict, discourse-pragmatic adjustments on the part of scientists occur. In this article, we investigate 1) how scientists establish themselves as epistemic authorities in the different formats and 2) how they try to enforce scientific discourse routines in media-mediated and politically framed discourses. As a basis of this empirical research, we compiled a corpus of press conferences organized by the Science Media Center Germany in Cologne and political talk shows of the public broadcasters in the period from March 2020 to April 2021. It turns out that the scientists behave in accordance with their scientific discourse norms and are hardly prepared to cross borders. The article aims to show in detail which strategies scientists use to hold on to their scientific discourse routines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学、政治和媒体紧张局势下的科学交流:通过在新闻会议和政治谈话节目中谈判发言标准
自2020年初冠状病毒大流行开始以来,病毒学家一直出现在大众媒体上,并经常成为(政治)脱口秀节目的嘉宾。在这里,不同的话语逻辑和规范相遇,即科学、政治和媒体的话语逻辑和规范。在这一冲突领域,科学家的话语-实用主义调整发生了。在本文中,我们研究了1)科学家如何以不同的形式确立自己作为认知权威的地位,以及2)他们如何试图在媒体介导和政治框架的话语中执行科学话语惯例。作为实证研究的基础,我们整理了2020年3月至2021年4月期间德国科隆科学媒体中心举办的新闻发布会和公共广播公司的政治谈话节目的语料库。事实证明,科学家的行为符合他们的科学话语规范,几乎不准备跨越国界。这篇文章旨在详细展示科学家们使用哪些策略来保持他们的科学话语惯例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Funktionen von Unsicherheitsthematisierungen in journalistischen Medien The Impact of Communicating Advocacy and Scientific Uncertainty on a Scientist’s Trustworthiness Corpus Approaches to Analysing Uncertainty and Ignorance in Academic Discourse Konstitution von Nichtwissen und Unsicherheit im Sprachgebrauch – ein programmatischer Systematisierungsversuch Beraten und Prognostizieren. Unsicheres Wissen in der institutionellen vs. der massenmedialen Politikberatung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1