Estimating Cost Savings for Aviation Fuel and CO2 Emission Reductions Strategies

Q3 Social Sciences Collegiate Aviation Review Pub Date : 2013-10-01 DOI:10.22488/OKSTATE.18.100513
Mary E. Johnson, Alan Gonzalez
{"title":"Estimating Cost Savings for Aviation Fuel and CO2 Emission Reductions Strategies","authors":"Mary E. Johnson, Alan Gonzalez","doi":"10.22488/OKSTATE.18.100513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving reductions in aviation greenhouse gas emissions while growing the aviation industry is both a national and a global challenge. This paper discusses and summarizes the suggestions for reducing emissions, and both the short-term and long-term emissions goals for three aviation industry groups, the European Union and United States aviation regulatory agencies, and the United Nations specialized agency for civil aviation. Reducing fuel consumption affects an air carrier’s bottom line by reducing fuel costs and carbon emissions. Investments may be required in aircraft or procedural changes to reduce demand for fuel by reducing consumption while still providing the same level of air service. Investing in reducing fuel consumption is not only important to comply with any emission trading scheme, but will also become a major factor for survival in the present competitive air transportation market. A general method to estimate cost savings is developed that presents a comparison method independent of the specific type of fuel reduction method. This method uses the percentage of fuel reduced to analyze cost savings using a range of fuel prices and non-discounted payback period. Analysts may use this method for calculating the savings specific methods of reducing fuel consumption.","PeriodicalId":39089,"journal":{"name":"Collegiate Aviation Review","volume":"65 1","pages":"79-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegiate Aviation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.18.100513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Achieving reductions in aviation greenhouse gas emissions while growing the aviation industry is both a national and a global challenge. This paper discusses and summarizes the suggestions for reducing emissions, and both the short-term and long-term emissions goals for three aviation industry groups, the European Union and United States aviation regulatory agencies, and the United Nations specialized agency for civil aviation. Reducing fuel consumption affects an air carrier’s bottom line by reducing fuel costs and carbon emissions. Investments may be required in aircraft or procedural changes to reduce demand for fuel by reducing consumption while still providing the same level of air service. Investing in reducing fuel consumption is not only important to comply with any emission trading scheme, but will also become a major factor for survival in the present competitive air transportation market. A general method to estimate cost savings is developed that presents a comparison method independent of the specific type of fuel reduction method. This method uses the percentage of fuel reduced to analyze cost savings using a range of fuel prices and non-discounted payback period. Analysts may use this method for calculating the savings specific methods of reducing fuel consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算航空燃料和二氧化碳减排战略的成本节约
在发展航空业的同时实现航空温室气体排放的减少,既是一项国家挑战,也是一项全球性挑战。本文对三个航空工业集团、欧盟和美国航空监管机构、联合国民用航空专门机构的减排建议、短期和长期排放目标进行了讨论和总结。减少燃料消耗通过降低燃料成本和碳排放影响航空公司的底线。可能需要对飞机或程序进行投资,以便在提供相同水平的航空服务的同时减少消耗,从而减少对燃料的需求。投资减少燃油消耗不仅对遵守排放交易计划很重要,而且也将成为在目前竞争激烈的航空运输市场上生存的主要因素。提出了一种估算成本节约的通用方法,它提供了一种独立于具体类型的燃料减少方法的比较方法。该方法使用燃料减少的百分比来分析使用一系列燃料价格和非贴现投资回收期的成本节约。分析人员可以用这种方法计算节省的具体方法来减少燃料消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collegiate Aviation Review
Collegiate Aviation Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Different Learning Style Inventories Report Similar Findings Among Pilots? Airspace Ownership Controversies in the United States: A Concise History A Bibliographical Analysis of Pragmatic Strategies Responding to the Pandemic Crisis in Aviation Identification, Evaluation, and Causal Factor Determination of Maintenance Errors Common to Major U.S. Certificated Air Carriers Exploring the State of SMS Implementation at Airports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1