Roads and Routes in Northwestern and Adjoining Parts of Central Asia Minor: From the Romans to Byzantium, with Some Remarks on their Fate during the Ottoman Period up to the 17th Century

Q1 Arts and Humanities Gephyra Pub Date : 2020-06-22 DOI:10.37095/gephyra.742745
Klaus Belke
{"title":"Roads and Routes in Northwestern and Adjoining Parts of Central Asia Minor: From the Romans to Byzantium, with Some Remarks on their Fate during the Ottoman Period up to the 17th Century","authors":"Klaus Belke","doi":"10.37095/gephyra.742745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the development of roads in northwestern (and parts of Central) Asia Minor from the Roman to the Byzantine period, pointing also to some changes in the Turkish period until about the 17th century. There was a remarkable continuity regarding the main routes of long distance traffic, but these routes could change in detail, corresponding to different military and economic focuses and needs. Design and building techniques of the roads changed, depending on the economic resources the state was able to spend and above all on the change from wagons and carts to pack animals. Neglect of the wide, paved long-distance roads of the Roman imperial period at the end of antiquity was linked to the gradual decrease of vehicular traffic in Asia Minor. By the sixth century AD, travel and transport relied on mounts and pack animals, except for some short-distance trans-portation on simple oxcarts. Roads were adapted to these means of transport and became narrower and stepped at steep passages. From the seventh century onwards, following the loss of the eastern provinces and during the nearly annual Arab invasions of Anatolia, the Byzantines chose routes that were partly different from the main routes of the Roman period and Late Antiquity, but which mostly were also inherited from their Roman predecessors. The main routes through Asia Minor were generally maintained in an acceptable order, but very few really new roads were built. After the Seljuk conquests roads became insecure again. The main lines of communication did not change, at least not in regions under Byzantine control. The Ottomans took over most of the roads used by the Byzantines for their military campaigns and for trade. It seems, however, that they were readier to build at least a limited number of entirely new roads. Their building techniques more or less followed the examples of their Byzantine predecessors.","PeriodicalId":37539,"journal":{"name":"Gephyra","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gephyra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.742745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper examines the development of roads in northwestern (and parts of Central) Asia Minor from the Roman to the Byzantine period, pointing also to some changes in the Turkish period until about the 17th century. There was a remarkable continuity regarding the main routes of long distance traffic, but these routes could change in detail, corresponding to different military and economic focuses and needs. Design and building techniques of the roads changed, depending on the economic resources the state was able to spend and above all on the change from wagons and carts to pack animals. Neglect of the wide, paved long-distance roads of the Roman imperial period at the end of antiquity was linked to the gradual decrease of vehicular traffic in Asia Minor. By the sixth century AD, travel and transport relied on mounts and pack animals, except for some short-distance trans-portation on simple oxcarts. Roads were adapted to these means of transport and became narrower and stepped at steep passages. From the seventh century onwards, following the loss of the eastern provinces and during the nearly annual Arab invasions of Anatolia, the Byzantines chose routes that were partly different from the main routes of the Roman period and Late Antiquity, but which mostly were also inherited from their Roman predecessors. The main routes through Asia Minor were generally maintained in an acceptable order, but very few really new roads were built. After the Seljuk conquests roads became insecure again. The main lines of communication did not change, at least not in regions under Byzantine control. The Ottomans took over most of the roads used by the Byzantines for their military campaigns and for trade. It seems, however, that they were readier to build at least a limited number of entirely new roads. Their building techniques more or less followed the examples of their Byzantine predecessors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小中亚西北部和邻近地区的道路和路线:从罗马人到拜占庭,以及对他们在奥斯曼帝国时期直到17世纪的命运的一些评论
本文考察了从罗马时期到拜占庭时期小亚细亚西北部(和中部部分地区)的道路发展,并指出了土耳其时期直到大约17世纪的一些变化。长途交通的主要路线具有显著的连续性,但这些路线可能会根据不同的军事和经济重点和需要而改变细节。道路的设计和建造技术随着国家经济资源的变化而变化,最重要的是,从马车到驮运动物的变化。在古代末期的罗马帝国时期,人们忽视了宽阔、铺砌的长途公路,这与小亚细亚地区车辆交通的逐渐减少有关。到了公元6世纪,旅行和运输依赖于坐骑和驮畜,除了一些短途运输使用简单的牛车。道路适应了这些交通工具,变得更窄,在陡峭的通道上有台阶。从7世纪开始,随着东部行省的丧失,以及阿拉伯人几乎每年都入侵安纳托利亚,拜占庭人选择的路线部分不同于罗马时期和古代晚期的主要路线,但大部分也继承了他们的罗马前辈。通过小亚细亚的主要道路基本上维持在一个可以接受的秩序,但很少建造真正的新道路。塞尔柱人征服后,道路再次变得不安全。交通的主要线路没有改变,至少在拜占庭控制的地区没有改变。奥斯曼人占领了拜占庭人用于军事和贸易的大部分道路。然而,他们似乎更愿意建造至少有限数量的全新道路。他们的建筑技术或多或少效仿了拜占庭前辈的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gephyra
Gephyra Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gephyra - a Journal for the Ancient History and Cultures of the Eastern Mediterranean - is an open access publication platform for articles from all fields of research into Asia Minor and the Eastern Mediterranean, insofar as they shed new light on the history and culture of this geographical and historical region. Scope: Epigraphic, archaeological, numismatic and art historical contributions, commented and evaluated material presentations, as well as historical reflections and essays are all equally welcome.
期刊最新文献
A New Milestone from Cibyra Kommemorativinschrift anlässlich der Stiftung von Opferfesten und Weihgaben durch einen Familienverband im Heiligtum von Dabla Pera Müzesi’ndeki Bizans Kurşun Mühürleri Senatorial Estates in Imperial Asia Minor – State of the Question, Methodological Issues and Perspectives on Future Research Kalinda’dan Hellenistik Dönem Amphora Mühürleri
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1