Comparing the Influences of Masking, Crowding, Response Conflict, and Cortical Scaling on Simple Shape Identification with Foveal Targets

S. Haase, G. Fisk, Matthew Worley, Brendan Rosenberger
{"title":"Comparing the Influences of Masking, Crowding, Response Conflict, and Cortical Scaling on Simple Shape Identification with Foveal Targets","authors":"S. Haase, G. Fisk, Matthew Worley, Brendan Rosenberger","doi":"10.24193/cbb.2022.26.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two experiments were conducted to compare the effects of masking and crowding on simple shape perception. The target stimuli were presented in foveal vision, where masking effects are generally investigated and where crowding effects are typically small compared to peripheral vision. The second experiment investigated the potential involvement of the dorsal visual pathway by testing if a peripheral crowding stimulus could interfere with the perception of a target shape, if it were scaled to account for low visual acuity? The results of both experiments indicated strong congruency effects, especially for pattern and metacontrast masking (which, in some respects, is similar to crowding). Congruency effects were generally weak for distractors presented further from the target. In Experiment 2, cortically scaled distractors only showed a potential influence in the forward masking condition. Perhaps this is an indication of a priming effect from the distant crowding stimuli. Further research might reveal the extent to which crowding displays can test physiologically motivated hypotheses.","PeriodicalId":37371,"journal":{"name":"Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/cbb.2022.26.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to compare the effects of masking and crowding on simple shape perception. The target stimuli were presented in foveal vision, where masking effects are generally investigated and where crowding effects are typically small compared to peripheral vision. The second experiment investigated the potential involvement of the dorsal visual pathway by testing if a peripheral crowding stimulus could interfere with the perception of a target shape, if it were scaled to account for low visual acuity? The results of both experiments indicated strong congruency effects, especially for pattern and metacontrast masking (which, in some respects, is similar to crowding). Congruency effects were generally weak for distractors presented further from the target. In Experiment 2, cortically scaled distractors only showed a potential influence in the forward masking condition. Perhaps this is an indication of a priming effect from the distant crowding stimuli. Further research might reveal the extent to which crowding displays can test physiologically motivated hypotheses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掩蔽、拥挤、反应冲突和皮质标度对中央凹目标简单形状识别的影响比较
通过两个实验比较了掩蔽和拥挤对简单形状感知的影响。目标刺激呈现在中央凹视觉中,那里的掩蔽效应通常被研究,与周围视觉相比,拥挤效应通常较小。第二个实验调查了背侧视觉通路的潜在参与,通过测试是否外围拥挤刺激会干扰目标形状的感知,如果它被缩放到考虑低视力。两个实验的结果都表明了强烈的一致性效应,特别是模式和元对比掩蔽(在某些方面,类似于拥挤)。当干扰物离目标较远时,一致性效应一般较弱。在实验2中,皮层尺度干扰物仅在正向掩蔽条件下表现出潜在的影响。也许这是远处拥挤刺激的启动效应的一个迹象。进一步的研究可能会揭示拥挤展示在多大程度上可以测试生理动机假说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal
Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal publishes contributions from all areas of cognitive science, focusing on disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to information processing and behavior analysis. We encourage contributions from the following domains: psychology, neuroscience, artificial intelligence, linguistics, ethology, anthropology and philosophy of mind. The journal covers empirical studies and theoretical reviews that expand our understanding of cognitive, neural, and behavioral mechanisms. Both fundamental and applied studies are welcomed. On occasions, special issues will be covering particular themes, under the editorship of invited experts.
期刊最新文献
Do you believe that aliens feel pain? An empirical investigation of mental state attributions Civic engagement during times of crisis: Personal motivations of Romanian adults at the onset of the war in Ukraine The leader’s other-oriented perfectionism, followers’ job stress and workplace well-being in the context of multiple team membership: The moderator role of pressure to be performant Components of the university learning environment, academic burnout, and shame among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modelling approach The relationship between cognitive functions and disinhibition: Observations of cognitively impaired patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1