Walking a Tightrope: Responding to Roth, Brandt, Russell, and Skow

Daniel Groll
{"title":"Walking a Tightrope: Responding to Roth, Brandt, Russell, and Skow","authors":"Daniel Groll","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A) Accounts for the importance of genetic knowledge to many donor-conceived people (and many people generally), but B) Does not attribute too much significance to genetic knowledge, and C) Recognizes societal forces that shape, not always in salutary ways, people’s interest in genetic knowledge, but D) Does not thereby undermine the significance of people’s interest in having genetic knowledge, while also E) Putting gamete donors on the hook for being available to their genetic offspring, but without F) Attributing parental responsibility to gamete donors.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"29 1","pages":"214 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2022-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A) Accounts for the importance of genetic knowledge to many donor-conceived people (and many people generally), but B) Does not attribute too much significance to genetic knowledge, and C) Recognizes societal forces that shape, not always in salutary ways, people’s interest in genetic knowledge, but D) Does not thereby undermine the significance of people’s interest in having genetic knowledge, while also E) Putting gamete donors on the hook for being available to their genetic offspring, but without F) Attributing parental responsibility to gamete donors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走钢丝:回应罗斯、勃兰特、罗素和斯科
A)说明了遗传知识对许多捐赠者怀孕的人(以及一般的许多人)的重要性,但是B)没有赋予遗传知识太多的重要性,并且C)认识到社会力量塑造了人们对遗传知识的兴趣,但并不总是以有益的方式,但是D)不会因此破坏人们对遗传知识的兴趣的重要性,同时E)让配子捐赠者为他们的遗传后代服务。F)将父母的责任归咎于配子捐赠者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Being an Anorectic versus Having Anorexia: Should the DSM Diagnostic Criteria Be Modified? Diagnosing Desire: Biopolitics and Femininity into the Twenty-First Century by Alyson K. Spurgas (review) Introduction to the Symposium on Daniel Groll's Conceiving People Significant Interests and the Right to Know Being the Right Kind of Parent: Conceiving People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1