The predictive influence of intelligence and communicative language ability on school achievement

M. Nikolić, Maja Cvijetić
{"title":"The predictive influence of intelligence and communicative language ability on school achievement","authors":"M. Nikolić, Maja Cvijetić","doi":"10.5937/istrped2301131n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although numerous studies show that intelligence, measured by various tests, is a significant predictor of school achievement, this cognitive variable can only explain about 50% of the variance. It is also known that communicative language ability represents an important basis for learning subject content in the early period of formal education. One of the most comprehensive models of language ability (Bahman, Palmer, 1996), in addition to strategic knowledge, includes language knowledge that includes organizational language knowledge (grammatical and textual) and pragmatic language knowledge. Although the non-cognitive factors de facto participate in the explanation of school success, the aim of the research presented in this paper was to determine the predictive influence of intelligence and communicative language ability, i.e. organizational and pragmatic language knowledge on differences in school achievement in Serbian, English and Mathematics at the end of the first half of the fifth grade. The research was conducted on the sample of 197 fifth-grade students (51% girls, average age 11.5 months) in elementary schools in Loznica. The authors of the paper applied an adapted form of the test of communicative language abilities that was applied in research in a bilingual context (Šimonji-Černak, 2005). Revisk was used to test verbal and manipulative intelligence (Biro, 1997). We started from the assumption that organizational language knowledge, has a more significant predictive influence on differences in school performance in the above-mentioned subjects than intelligence. Hierarchical regression analysis model determined that the predictor variables of organizational language knowledge explain 36.8% - 49.4% of the variance in school achievement, while the intelligence variables are related to the achievements in Serbian and Mathematics and explain 0.6% - 3% of the variance. A significant partial contribution of pragmatic knowledge and knowledge of verbs as an element of grammatical language knowledge were determined in all three subjects, as well as the contribution of knowledge of grammatical rules only in the Serbian language.The results confirm the hypothesis and indicate that for success in the mother tongue, foreign language and mathematics it is important to develop grammatical knowledge, and pay special attention to the importance and strategies of developing pragmatic language function in the period of early formal education.","PeriodicalId":32439,"journal":{"name":"Research in English Language Pedagogy","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in English Language Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2301131n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although numerous studies show that intelligence, measured by various tests, is a significant predictor of school achievement, this cognitive variable can only explain about 50% of the variance. It is also known that communicative language ability represents an important basis for learning subject content in the early period of formal education. One of the most comprehensive models of language ability (Bahman, Palmer, 1996), in addition to strategic knowledge, includes language knowledge that includes organizational language knowledge (grammatical and textual) and pragmatic language knowledge. Although the non-cognitive factors de facto participate in the explanation of school success, the aim of the research presented in this paper was to determine the predictive influence of intelligence and communicative language ability, i.e. organizational and pragmatic language knowledge on differences in school achievement in Serbian, English and Mathematics at the end of the first half of the fifth grade. The research was conducted on the sample of 197 fifth-grade students (51% girls, average age 11.5 months) in elementary schools in Loznica. The authors of the paper applied an adapted form of the test of communicative language abilities that was applied in research in a bilingual context (Šimonji-Černak, 2005). Revisk was used to test verbal and manipulative intelligence (Biro, 1997). We started from the assumption that organizational language knowledge, has a more significant predictive influence on differences in school performance in the above-mentioned subjects than intelligence. Hierarchical regression analysis model determined that the predictor variables of organizational language knowledge explain 36.8% - 49.4% of the variance in school achievement, while the intelligence variables are related to the achievements in Serbian and Mathematics and explain 0.6% - 3% of the variance. A significant partial contribution of pragmatic knowledge and knowledge of verbs as an element of grammatical language knowledge were determined in all three subjects, as well as the contribution of knowledge of grammatical rules only in the Serbian language.The results confirm the hypothesis and indicate that for success in the mother tongue, foreign language and mathematics it is important to develop grammatical knowledge, and pay special attention to the importance and strategies of developing pragmatic language function in the period of early formal education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智力和语言交际能力对学业成绩的预测作用
尽管许多研究表明,通过各种测试衡量的智力是学习成绩的重要预测指标,但这种认知变量只能解释大约50%的差异。众所周知,在正规教育的早期阶段,交际语言能力是学习学科内容的重要基础。最全面的语言能力模型之一(Bahman, Palmer, 1996),除了战略知识外,还包括语言知识,其中包括组织语言知识(语法和文本)和语用语言知识。虽然非认知因素事实上参与了学业成功的解释,但本文研究的目的是确定智力和交际语言能力(即组织和语用语言知识)对五年级上半学期结束时塞尔维亚语、英语和数学学业成绩差异的预测影响。该研究以洛兹尼察小学197名五年级学生(51%为女生,平均年龄11.5个月)为样本进行。该论文的作者应用了一种交际语言能力测试的改编形式,该测试已应用于双语背景下的研究(Šimonji-Černak, 2005)。复习被用来测试语言和操纵智力(比罗,1997)。我们从假设组织语言知识对上述科目的学校表现差异的预测影响比智力更显著的假设开始。层次回归分析模型发现,组织语言知识的预测变量解释了36.8% ~ 49.4%的学业成绩方差,而智力变量与塞尔维亚语和数学成绩相关,解释了0.6% ~ 3%的方差。语用知识和动词知识作为语法语言知识的一个要素的重要部分贡献被确定在所有三个科目中,以及语法规则知识的贡献仅在塞尔维亚语中。结果证实了这一假设,并表明为了在母语、外语和数学方面取得成功,语法知识的发展是重要的,在早期正规教育时期特别注意发展语用语言功能的重要性和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of gender on motivation towards science learning: A meta-analysis study Digital literacy of teachers for using electronic textbooks in the teaching class of nature and society Student perceptions of values and limitations of distance teaching during the pandemic of COVID-19 Strukturisanje pravougaonika kod učenika mlađeg školskog uzrasta Uključenost roditelja u život i rad škole
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1