Towards an Evaluation of Denoising Algorithms with Respect to Realistic Camera Noise

Tamara Seybold, Christian Keimel, Marion Knopp, W. Stechele
{"title":"Towards an Evaluation of Denoising Algorithms with Respect to Realistic Camera Noise","authors":"Tamara Seybold, Christian Keimel, Marion Knopp, W. Stechele","doi":"10.1109/ISM.2013.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development and tuning of denoising algorithms is usually based on readily processed test images that are artificially degraded with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). While AWGN allows us to easily generate test data in a repeatable manner, it does not reflect the noise characteristics in a real digital camera. Realistic camera noise is signal-dependent and spatially correlated due to the demosaicking step required to obtain full-color images. Hence, the noise characteristic is fundamentally different from AWGN. Using such unrealistic data to test, optimize and compare denoising algorithms may lead to incorrect parameter tuning or sub optimal choices in research on denoising algorithms. In this paper, we therefore propose an approach to evaluate denoising algorithms with respect to realistic camera noise: we describe a new camera noise model that includes the full processing chain of a single sensor camera. We determine the visual quality of noisy and denoised test sequences using a subjective test with 18 participants. We show that the noise characteristics have a significant effect on visual quality. Quality metrics, which are required to compare denoising results, are applied, and we evaluate the performance of 10 full-reference metrics and one no-reference metric with our realistic test data. We conclude that a more realistic noise model should be used in future research to improve the quality estimation of digital images and videos and to improve the research on denoising algorithms.","PeriodicalId":6311,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)","volume":"29 1","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2013.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The development and tuning of denoising algorithms is usually based on readily processed test images that are artificially degraded with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). While AWGN allows us to easily generate test data in a repeatable manner, it does not reflect the noise characteristics in a real digital camera. Realistic camera noise is signal-dependent and spatially correlated due to the demosaicking step required to obtain full-color images. Hence, the noise characteristic is fundamentally different from AWGN. Using such unrealistic data to test, optimize and compare denoising algorithms may lead to incorrect parameter tuning or sub optimal choices in research on denoising algorithms. In this paper, we therefore propose an approach to evaluate denoising algorithms with respect to realistic camera noise: we describe a new camera noise model that includes the full processing chain of a single sensor camera. We determine the visual quality of noisy and denoised test sequences using a subjective test with 18 participants. We show that the noise characteristics have a significant effect on visual quality. Quality metrics, which are required to compare denoising results, are applied, and we evaluate the performance of 10 full-reference metrics and one no-reference metric with our realistic test data. We conclude that a more realistic noise model should be used in future research to improve the quality estimation of digital images and videos and to improve the research on denoising algorithms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于真实相机噪声的去噪算法评价
去噪算法的开发和调整通常是基于易于处理的测试图像,这些图像被加性高斯白噪声(AWGN)人工退化。虽然AWGN使我们能够轻松地以可重复的方式生成测试数据,但它并不能反映真实数码相机的噪声特性。逼真的相机噪声是信号依赖和空间相关的,因为获得全彩图像所需的去马赛克步骤。因此,噪声特性与AWGN有本质区别。使用这些不切实际的数据来测试、优化和比较去噪算法,可能会导致去噪算法研究中的参数调整错误或次优选择。因此,在本文中,我们提出了一种方法来评估关于真实相机噪声的去噪算法:我们描述了一个新的相机噪声模型,其中包括单个传感器相机的完整处理链。我们使用18名参与者的主观测试来确定噪声和去噪测试序列的视觉质量。研究表明,噪声特性对视觉质量有显著影响。应用了比较去噪结果所需的质量指标,我们用实际测试数据评估了10个完全参考指标和一个无参考指标的性能。我们得出结论,在未来的研究中应该使用更真实的噪声模型来提高数字图像和视频的质量估计,并改进去噪算法的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The LectureSight System in Production Scenarios and Its Impact on Learning from Video Recorded Lectures Similarity-Based Browsing of Image Search Results Efficient Super Resolution Using Edge Directed Unsharp Masking Sharpening Method A Fluorescent Mid-air Screen Towards Sketch-Based Motion Queries in Sports Videos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1