The Formation of American Post-war Belarusian Studies

E. Kodin
{"title":"The Formation of American Post-war Belarusian Studies","authors":"E. Kodin","doi":"10.21638/11701/spbu02.2022.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American post-war Belarusian studies during its initial stage differed from similar processes in other countries. The CIA, which was interested in using the Belarusian emigration for its own purposes, the Congress, and some senators, with whom the leadership of the Belarusian- American Association actively worked, originally played a significant role. The CIA supported the activities of the Chairman of the Rada of the Belarusian People’s Republic (in exile) Nikolai Abramchik, who was one of the first Belarusian emigrants to publicly declare Moscow’s anti-Belarusian policy, using such concepts as the “Russian genocide of the Belarusian people”, “occupation of Belarusian lands”, etc., calling on America to “protect the oppressed Belarusian people”. In 1954, a special commission of the Congress held hearings on the topic “The Communist seizure and occupation of Belarus”, during which a kind of methodological guidelines for the “correct” study of the history of Belarus were determined. Against the background of McCarthyism and the fight against the “Red scare” allegedly coming from Moscow, it completely fitted into the so-called totalitarian concept in American Russian studies (then Sovietology), and hence Belarusian studies, which was being formed. It was in such a difficult political and ideological situation that the first study by N. P. Vakar “Belarus. The Creation of a Nation” was being created in the Russian Research Center of Harvard, which was published in 1956, and not only received general recognition in the American scholarly community, but also superseded all kinds of political pamphlets in the academic space.","PeriodicalId":53995,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Istoriya","volume":"436 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Istoriya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2022.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

American post-war Belarusian studies during its initial stage differed from similar processes in other countries. The CIA, which was interested in using the Belarusian emigration for its own purposes, the Congress, and some senators, with whom the leadership of the Belarusian- American Association actively worked, originally played a significant role. The CIA supported the activities of the Chairman of the Rada of the Belarusian People’s Republic (in exile) Nikolai Abramchik, who was one of the first Belarusian emigrants to publicly declare Moscow’s anti-Belarusian policy, using such concepts as the “Russian genocide of the Belarusian people”, “occupation of Belarusian lands”, etc., calling on America to “protect the oppressed Belarusian people”. In 1954, a special commission of the Congress held hearings on the topic “The Communist seizure and occupation of Belarus”, during which a kind of methodological guidelines for the “correct” study of the history of Belarus were determined. Against the background of McCarthyism and the fight against the “Red scare” allegedly coming from Moscow, it completely fitted into the so-called totalitarian concept in American Russian studies (then Sovietology), and hence Belarusian studies, which was being formed. It was in such a difficult political and ideological situation that the first study by N. P. Vakar “Belarus. The Creation of a Nation” was being created in the Russian Research Center of Harvard, which was published in 1956, and not only received general recognition in the American scholarly community, but also superseded all kinds of political pamphlets in the academic space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国战后白俄罗斯研究的形成
美国战后白俄罗斯研究的初始阶段与其他国家的类似研究过程有所不同。中央情报局对利用白俄罗斯移民达到自己的目的很感兴趣,国会和一些与白俄罗斯-美国人协会领导层积极合作的参议员最初发挥了重要作用。中央情报局支持白俄罗斯人民共和国(流亡)拉达主席Nikolai Abramchik的活动,他是最早公开宣布莫斯科反白俄罗斯政策的白俄罗斯移民之一,使用“俄罗斯对白俄罗斯人民的种族灭绝”、“占领白俄罗斯土地”等概念,呼吁美国“保护被压迫的白俄罗斯人民”。1954年,大会的一个特别委员会就“共产党对白俄罗斯的夺取和占领”问题举行了听证会,会上确定了“正确”研究白俄罗斯历史的一种方法准则。在麦卡锡主义和反对据称来自莫斯科的“红色恐慌”的背景下,它完全符合美国俄国研究(当时是苏联学)中所谓的极权主义概念,因此正在形成的白俄罗斯研究。正是在如此困难的政治和意识形态形势下,n·p·瓦卡尔的第一份研究《白俄罗斯》。《一个国家的创建》是由哈佛大学俄罗斯研究中心创作的,1956年出版,不仅在美国学术界得到了普遍认可,而且在学术领域取代了各种政治小册子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Cyclic Concepts of Russian History in Modern Historiography The Varangian Issue through the Prism of the Social Contract Concept Ideology of the Movement of Liberal Legalists and the Theory of Conservative Liberalism Imperial Russia as a Failed State: The Role of Orthodox Church Regency and Transfer of Power in Muscovy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1