Konrad Lange on ‘the Illusion of Materials’ in Painting and Visual Arts: Revisiting a Psychoaesthetic Theory of the Perception of Material Properties

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 ART CERAMICS-ART AND PERCEPTION Pub Date : 2019-10-28 DOI:10.1163/22134913-20191126
David Romand
{"title":"Konrad Lange on ‘the Illusion of Materials’ in Painting and Visual Arts: Revisiting a Psychoaesthetic Theory of the Perception of Material Properties","authors":"David Romand","doi":"10.1163/22134913-20191126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present article, I discuss the concept of ‘the illusion of materials’ (die Stoffillusion) as it was elaborated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by the German aesthetician and art historian Konrad Lange (1855–1921). Here I intend to revisit a remarkable theory of the psychological mechanisms that underlie the aesthetic experience of mimesis in painting and, more generally speaking, in visual arts. First, I deal with the historical background of Lange’s contribution by saying a word about the German-speaking psychoaesthetic paradigm as it developed between the mid-19th century and WWI. Second, I discuss the basic tenets of Lange’s ‘illusionistic aesthetics’ (Illusionsästhetik), the view according to which the experience of the beautiful lies in a process of ‘conscious self-delusion’ (bewusste Selbsttäuschung) by which means the contemplating subject mentally oscillates between ‘semblance’ and ‘reality’. Third, I analyze Lange’s theoretical way of conceiving the illusion of materials by showing that he identified it as one of the seven chief categories of aesthetic illusions and by insisting on his distinction between the ‘subjective’ non-aesthetic illusion and the ‘objective’ aesthetic illusion of materials. Fourth, I show how Lange conceived the place of the illusion of materials in aesthetic experience in general and in the contemplation of painting and sculpture in particular. In a fifth, concluding part, I deal with the significance of Lange’s ideas on the illusion of materials today by highlighting their close relation to Daniel Arasse’s conception of painting contemplation as a dialectics of ‘the pictorial’ and ‘the iconic’, while also suggesting that they may be very fruitful within the context of current experimental psycho- and neuroaesthetic research.","PeriodicalId":42895,"journal":{"name":"CERAMICS-ART AND PERCEPTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CERAMICS-ART AND PERCEPTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-20191126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the present article, I discuss the concept of ‘the illusion of materials’ (die Stoffillusion) as it was elaborated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by the German aesthetician and art historian Konrad Lange (1855–1921). Here I intend to revisit a remarkable theory of the psychological mechanisms that underlie the aesthetic experience of mimesis in painting and, more generally speaking, in visual arts. First, I deal with the historical background of Lange’s contribution by saying a word about the German-speaking psychoaesthetic paradigm as it developed between the mid-19th century and WWI. Second, I discuss the basic tenets of Lange’s ‘illusionistic aesthetics’ (Illusionsästhetik), the view according to which the experience of the beautiful lies in a process of ‘conscious self-delusion’ (bewusste Selbsttäuschung) by which means the contemplating subject mentally oscillates between ‘semblance’ and ‘reality’. Third, I analyze Lange’s theoretical way of conceiving the illusion of materials by showing that he identified it as one of the seven chief categories of aesthetic illusions and by insisting on his distinction between the ‘subjective’ non-aesthetic illusion and the ‘objective’ aesthetic illusion of materials. Fourth, I show how Lange conceived the place of the illusion of materials in aesthetic experience in general and in the contemplation of painting and sculpture in particular. In a fifth, concluding part, I deal with the significance of Lange’s ideas on the illusion of materials today by highlighting their close relation to Daniel Arasse’s conception of painting contemplation as a dialectics of ‘the pictorial’ and ‘the iconic’, while also suggesting that they may be very fruitful within the context of current experimental psycho- and neuroaesthetic research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康拉德·兰格论绘画和视觉艺术中的“材料幻觉”:重新审视材料属性感知的心理美学理论
在本文中,我将讨论19世纪末和20世纪初由德国美学家和艺术史学家康拉德·兰格(1855-1921)阐述的“材料的幻觉”(die Stoffillusion)概念。在这里,我打算重新审视一个引人注目的心理机制理论,该理论是绘画中模仿美学经验的基础,更广泛地说,在视觉艺术中。首先,我将通过对德语心理美学范式在19世纪中期和第一次世界大战之间的发展进行简要介绍,来处理兰格贡献的历史背景。其次,我讨论了兰格的“幻觉美学”(Illusionsästhetik)的基本原则,根据这种观点,美的体验存在于“有意识的自我欺骗”(bewusste Selbsttäuschung)的过程中,这意味着沉思的主体在“外表”和“现实”之间心理上摇摆。第三,我分析了兰格设想材料幻觉的理论方法,表明他将其确定为审美幻觉的七个主要类别之一,并坚持他对“主观的”非审美幻觉和“客观的”材料审美幻觉的区分。第四,我展示了兰格是如何在审美体验中,特别是在绘画和雕塑的沉思中,构思材料幻觉的位置的。在第五部分,也就是结语部分,我通过强调兰格关于材料幻觉的观点与丹尼尔·阿拉斯(Daniel Arasse)的绘画沉思概念的密切关系,强调它们与“图像”和“标志性”的辩证法的密切关系,来处理它们的重要性,同时也表明它们在当前实验心理和神经美学研究的背景下可能非常富有成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emotions, Simulation, and Abstract Art “People are gazing” — An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Viewing Velázquez Aesthetic Experience and Creativity in Interactive Art Orange & Teal When Scenes Look Like Materials: René Magritte’s Reversible Figure–Ground Motif
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1