Italian Verbs with Two Auxiliaries: A Forced-Choice Experiment

Pub Date : 2022-08-03 DOI:10.1515/probus-2022-0013
Stefano Rastelli
{"title":"Italian Verbs with Two Auxiliaries: A Forced-Choice Experiment","authors":"Stefano Rastelli","doi":"10.1515/probus-2022-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this experiment, 62 university students, native speakers of Italian living in Northern Italy, were asked to choose between two nearly identical sentences featuring intransitive verbs which, according to the literature, can take either auxiliary (AUX) essere “be” or avere “have” in compound tenses. A binary logistic regression showed that for 40% of the time, participants preferred one AUX over the other. In general, the frequency of verbs and association scores between the AUX and the past participle in the input straightforwardly determined the remaining preferences, and especially the choice of essere. The impact of verb semantics on participants’ choices depended on the AUX. In the presence of telic completions and inanimate subjects, the likelihood of AUX essere to be chosen increased, whereas no effect of animacy and completion type was found for the AUX avere. Based on these data, one may conclude that (a) AUX essere is more permeable to both frequency effect and verb semantics than avere; and (b) among educated young adult native speakers living in Northern Italy, there is much less optionality in the choice of the AUX than it is assumed by some linguists.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2022-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this experiment, 62 university students, native speakers of Italian living in Northern Italy, were asked to choose between two nearly identical sentences featuring intransitive verbs which, according to the literature, can take either auxiliary (AUX) essere “be” or avere “have” in compound tenses. A binary logistic regression showed that for 40% of the time, participants preferred one AUX over the other. In general, the frequency of verbs and association scores between the AUX and the past participle in the input straightforwardly determined the remaining preferences, and especially the choice of essere. The impact of verb semantics on participants’ choices depended on the AUX. In the presence of telic completions and inanimate subjects, the likelihood of AUX essere to be chosen increased, whereas no effect of animacy and completion type was found for the AUX avere. Based on these data, one may conclude that (a) AUX essere is more permeable to both frequency effect and verb semantics than avere; and (b) among educated young adult native speakers living in Northern Italy, there is much less optionality in the choice of the AUX than it is assumed by some linguists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
带两个助动词的意大利语动词:一个强迫选择实验
在这个实验中,62名生活在意大利北部的以意大利语为母语的大学生被要求在两个几乎相同的句子中选择一个,根据文献,这两个句子的不及物动词可以在复合时态中使用助动词“be”或平均动词“have”。二元逻辑回归显示,在40%的时间里,参与者更喜欢一个AUX而不是另一个。一般来说,输入中动词的频率和AUX与过去分词之间的关联分数直接决定了剩余的偏好,尤其是essere的选择。动词语义对参与者选择的影响取决于AUX。在有远端完成和无生命被试的情况下,选择AUX essere的可能性增加,而没有发现有生命和完成类型对AUX average的影响。基于这些数据,我们可以得出结论:(a) AUX essere对频率效应和动词语义的渗透性比平均值更强;(b)在居住在意大利北部的受过教育的年轻成年母语人士中,选择AUX的可选择性比一些语言学家所假设的要少得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1