The trust deficit in England: emerging research evidence about school leaders and the pandemic

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Educational Administration and History Pub Date : 2021-09-13 DOI:10.1080/00220620.2021.1975366
P. Thomson, T. Greany, Nicholas Martindale
{"title":"The trust deficit in England: emerging research evidence about school leaders and the pandemic","authors":"P. Thomson, T. Greany, Nicholas Martindale","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1975366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"England has been living with COVID-19, through peaks and troughs since March 2020. Policymakers see schools as integral to economic and social maintenance and recovery and have thus placed a high priority on education as a stable provision operating throughout a very long period of considerable uncertainty and instability. Because of rapidly changing levels of infection and scientific understandings of transmission and prevention measures, the government has adjusted, often at the last minute, the legal requirements around the opening and closing of schools in line with the various levels of lockdown. School leaders have been faced with challenges unimaginable prior to the pandemic. Because schools are a major site for virus transmission, leaders have had to pay particular attention to the management of staff, pupils and buildings. Working together with the two leader associations, the authors designed and conducted a national survey to assess the impact of the pandemic on leaders' well-being and career plans. While the authors have not yet completed interviewing a sample of those intending to leave and those intending to stay, it is abundantly clear that the government has some way to go to win back the school leaders on whom they depend.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"13 1","pages":"296 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1975366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

England has been living with COVID-19, through peaks and troughs since March 2020. Policymakers see schools as integral to economic and social maintenance and recovery and have thus placed a high priority on education as a stable provision operating throughout a very long period of considerable uncertainty and instability. Because of rapidly changing levels of infection and scientific understandings of transmission and prevention measures, the government has adjusted, often at the last minute, the legal requirements around the opening and closing of schools in line with the various levels of lockdown. School leaders have been faced with challenges unimaginable prior to the pandemic. Because schools are a major site for virus transmission, leaders have had to pay particular attention to the management of staff, pupils and buildings. Working together with the two leader associations, the authors designed and conducted a national survey to assess the impact of the pandemic on leaders' well-being and career plans. While the authors have not yet completed interviewing a sample of those intending to leave and those intending to stay, it is abundantly clear that the government has some way to go to win back the school leaders on whom they depend.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英格兰的信任赤字:关于学校领导和流行病的新研究证据
自2020年3月以来,英格兰一直与COVID-19共存,经历了高峰和低谷。政策制定者将学校视为经济和社会维持和恢复的组成部分,因此高度重视教育,将其作为在相当不确定和不稳定的很长时期内运行的稳定供应。由于感染水平的迅速变化以及对传播和预防措施的科学理解,政府经常在最后一刻根据不同程度的封锁调整了有关学校开放和关闭的法律要求。学校领导面临着疫情前难以想象的挑战。由于学校是病毒传播的主要场所,领导人不得不特别注意对教职员工、学生和建筑物的管理。作者与两个领导人协会合作,设计并开展了一项全国调查,以评估疫情对领导人福祉和职业规划的影响。虽然作者还没有完成对那些打算离开和打算留下的人的抽样采访,但很明显,要赢回他们所依赖的学校领导,政府还有一段路要走。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Administration and History
Journal of Educational Administration and History EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Ghana's basic education Headteacher leadership: critical discourse analysis of the Headteachers’ handbook Development of emotion regulation skills among new teachers in special education: the key role of educational leaders and colleagues Navigating power dynamics in elite interviews Beyond #MeToo in Iran: change through informal feminist educational leadership Illiberal democracy has now come to Florida: what can academics do?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1