Doing Too Little or Too Much? Private Law Before the European Court of Human Rights

Jan Zglinski
{"title":"Doing Too Little or Too Much? Private Law Before the European Court of Human Rights","authors":"Jan Zglinski","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEY013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question as to whether fundamental rights impose duties on private individuals is as much an old constitutional chestnut as it is a controversial current affair. Can a hotel owner deny hosting the member of a neo-Nazi party?1 Can a devout Christian baker refuse to make a cake for a same-sex wedding?2 Can a company dismiss a Muslim employee because she refuses to take her headscarf off at work?3 At the heart of these cases lies the issue whether private behaviour should be bound by fundamental rights, a problem legal doctrine calls horizontal effect. Courts across the globe have, in different ways and to different extents, recognised such an effect. They have thereby changed the rights and obligations private individuals hold towards each other. By the same token, they have changed private law as such. Private law no longer is an autonomous domain, insulated from external pressures. As its making and application are put under constitutional control, it has become, just like other legal fields, an area of ‘applied constitutional law’.4","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"91 1","pages":"98-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEY013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The question as to whether fundamental rights impose duties on private individuals is as much an old constitutional chestnut as it is a controversial current affair. Can a hotel owner deny hosting the member of a neo-Nazi party?1 Can a devout Christian baker refuse to make a cake for a same-sex wedding?2 Can a company dismiss a Muslim employee because she refuses to take her headscarf off at work?3 At the heart of these cases lies the issue whether private behaviour should be bound by fundamental rights, a problem legal doctrine calls horizontal effect. Courts across the globe have, in different ways and to different extents, recognised such an effect. They have thereby changed the rights and obligations private individuals hold towards each other. By the same token, they have changed private law as such. Private law no longer is an autonomous domain, insulated from external pressures. As its making and application are put under constitutional control, it has become, just like other legal fields, an area of ‘applied constitutional law’.4
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
做得太少还是太多?欧洲人权法院前的私法
关于基本权利是否要求个人承担义务的问题,既是一个古老的宪法问题,也是一个有争议的时事。酒店老板能否认接待过新纳粹党的成员吗?一个虔诚的基督徒面包师能拒绝为同性婚礼做蛋糕吗?公司可以因为穆斯林员工在工作时拒绝摘下头巾而解雇她吗?这些案件的核心问题在于私人行为是否应该受到基本权利的约束,法律理论称之为水平效应。世界各地的法院以不同的方式和不同的程度承认了这种影响。它们因此改变了个人之间的权利和义务。出于同样的原因,他们改变了私法本身。私法不再是一个不受外部压力影响的自治领域。由于它的制定和适用受到宪法的控制,它就像其他法律领域一样,成为“适用宪法”的一个领域
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
The unified patent court Corporate tax reform in the European Union: are the stars finally aligned? Rescuing transparency in the digital economy: in search of a common notion in EU consumer and data protection law The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service The European Union’s Preferential Trade Agreements: between convergence and differentiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1