Examining the impact of gender power and gender diversity within the top management team on firm performance and firm risk

IF 1.1 Q4 BUSINESS American Journal of Business Pub Date : 2023-01-26 DOI:10.1108/ajb-05-2022-0081
R. Walton, Mark A. Tribbitt
{"title":"Examining the impact of gender power and gender diversity within the top management team on firm performance and firm risk","authors":"R. Walton, Mark A. Tribbitt","doi":"10.1108/ajb-05-2022-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study moves beyond existing research on gender diversity to define a new construct – gender power. The study examines gender power within the top management team (TMT) and its relationship to firm performance and firm risk.Design/methodology/approachThe study utilizes a cross-disciplinary combination of upper echelons theory and finance theory as a framework to further examine the impact of gender power within the TMT and its impact on firm risk and firm performance. Employing data collected for 2,570 American publicly traded small-, medium- and large-cap firms over a 20-year period, panel regression analyses were conducted for measures of firm risk and firm performance, beta and return on assets (ROA), respectively.FindingsThis study shows that gender diversity and gender power are two distinct constructs with different effects. The findings from this study suggest that gender power may be a stronger predictor of the relationship between firm performance and firm risk than simply gender diversity alone.Research limitations/implicationsThis study was conducted based on a sample of publicly traded firms. These relationships may not be generalizable to firms in other contexts. Further, other variables representing firm performance and firm risk may add to this research.Practical implicationsUnderstanding the differences between gender diversity and gender power may allow firms to make more informed decisions when adding female executives to their TMTs.Originality/valueThis study proposes an objective representational indicator of structural power to measure the relative power of female executives of public companies that allows the expansion of existing research examining the distinction between gender diversity and gender power and their relationship to firm risk and firm performance.","PeriodicalId":44116,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-05-2022-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis study moves beyond existing research on gender diversity to define a new construct – gender power. The study examines gender power within the top management team (TMT) and its relationship to firm performance and firm risk.Design/methodology/approachThe study utilizes a cross-disciplinary combination of upper echelons theory and finance theory as a framework to further examine the impact of gender power within the TMT and its impact on firm risk and firm performance. Employing data collected for 2,570 American publicly traded small-, medium- and large-cap firms over a 20-year period, panel regression analyses were conducted for measures of firm risk and firm performance, beta and return on assets (ROA), respectively.FindingsThis study shows that gender diversity and gender power are two distinct constructs with different effects. The findings from this study suggest that gender power may be a stronger predictor of the relationship between firm performance and firm risk than simply gender diversity alone.Research limitations/implicationsThis study was conducted based on a sample of publicly traded firms. These relationships may not be generalizable to firms in other contexts. Further, other variables representing firm performance and firm risk may add to this research.Practical implicationsUnderstanding the differences between gender diversity and gender power may allow firms to make more informed decisions when adding female executives to their TMTs.Originality/valueThis study proposes an objective representational indicator of structural power to measure the relative power of female executives of public companies that allows the expansion of existing research examining the distinction between gender diversity and gender power and their relationship to firm risk and firm performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究高层管理团队中性别权力和性别多样性对公司绩效和公司风险的影响
目的本研究在性别多样性研究的基础上,提出了一个新的概念——性别权力。该研究考察了高层管理团队(TMT)中的性别权力及其与公司绩效和公司风险的关系。设计/方法/方法本研究利用上层理论和金融理论的跨学科组合作为框架,进一步研究性别权力在TMT中的影响及其对企业风险和企业绩效的影响。采用收集的数据为2570美国上市的小型,中型和大型股票公司在20年期间,面板回归分析,分别为企业风险和企业绩效,贝塔和资产回报率(ROA)的措施。研究结果表明,性别多样性和性别权力是两个不同的构念,具有不同的影响。这项研究的结果表明,性别权力可能比单纯的性别多样性更能预测公司绩效和公司风险之间的关系。研究局限/启示本研究以上市公司为样本进行。这些关系可能不适用于其他情况下的公司。此外,代表企业绩效和企业风险的其他变量可能会增加本研究。实际意义了解性别多样性和性别权力之间的差异,可以让公司在增加女性高管时做出更明智的决定。原创性/价值本研究提出了一个客观的结构权力代表性指标来衡量上市公司女性高管的相对权力,这使得现有的研究得以扩展,研究性别多样性和性别权力之间的区别以及它们与公司风险和公司绩效的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Deep pockets or empty coffers? Functional expenses, contribution revenue and the ability of nonprofits to pivot during COVID-19 CEO political ideology and credit risk assessment Investor attention during soccer World Cups Entrepreneurial Resilience in the Micro and Small Business Context – Systematic Literature Review A Practical Guide to Writing Performance Appraisals and Letters of Recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1