Non-Functional Requirements Analysis Based on Application Reviews in the Android App Market

Yongming Yao, Weiyi Jiang, Yulin Wang, Peng Song, Bin Wang
{"title":"Non-Functional Requirements Analysis Based on Application Reviews in the Android App Market","authors":"Yongming Yao, Weiyi Jiang, Yulin Wang, Peng Song, Bin Wang","doi":"10.4018/irmj.291694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are more than 3 million mobile apps in the Android market. The development process of every mobile application is rigorous, and many types of research on application quality requirements are derived, which are highly related to the development of applications. Research shows that user reviews of mobile applications are an unused large database that can provide feedback on user needs. In this article, user comments are automatically classified into non-functional requirements (NFRs) and other types. This paper proposes a loop matching classification technique (Loop Matching Classification). The three classification techniques of LMC, BOW, and TF-IDF were used to classify user comments, and the accuracy, recall rate, and F-measure of the results of the three classification techniques were compared. It was found that the Precision value of the LMC classification technique was 74.2%, the Recall was 82.5% and the F-measure was 78.1%.","PeriodicalId":13575,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Resour. Manag. J.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Resour. Manag. J.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.291694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are more than 3 million mobile apps in the Android market. The development process of every mobile application is rigorous, and many types of research on application quality requirements are derived, which are highly related to the development of applications. Research shows that user reviews of mobile applications are an unused large database that can provide feedback on user needs. In this article, user comments are automatically classified into non-functional requirements (NFRs) and other types. This paper proposes a loop matching classification technique (Loop Matching Classification). The three classification techniques of LMC, BOW, and TF-IDF were used to classify user comments, and the accuracy, recall rate, and F-measure of the results of the three classification techniques were compared. It was found that the Precision value of the LMC classification technique was 74.2%, the Recall was 82.5% and the F-measure was 78.1%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Android应用市场应用评审的非功能需求分析
Android市场上有超过300万个移动应用程序。每一个移动应用程序的开发过程都是严谨的,衍生出许多类型的应用程序质量需求研究,这些研究与应用程序的开发高度相关。研究表明,移动应用程序的用户评论是一个未使用的大型数据库,可以提供用户需求的反馈。在本文中,用户评论被自动划分为非功能需求(nfr)和其他类型。本文提出了一种循环匹配分类技术(loop matching classification)。采用LMC、BOW和TF-IDF三种分类技术对用户评论进行分类,并对三种分类技术结果的正确率、召回率和F-measure进行比较。结果表明,LMC分类技术的准确率为74.2%,召回率为82.5%,f值为78.1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Optimization of Automobile Part Product Development Using Integrated Product Development (IPD) Modelling Digital Transformation Within the Financial Sector: A South African Perspective From decision optimization to satisficing: Regulation of automated trading in the US financial markets Strategic business value from big data analytics: An empirical analysis of the mediating effects of value creation mechanisms "What I've received doesn't match what I saw online": Effects of purchase-risk notices on reducing online returns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1