The substantive representation of social groups: towards a new comparative research agenda

IF 2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Journal of Politics and Gender Pub Date : 2022-10-18 DOI:10.1332/251510821x16635712428686
Silvia Erzeel, E. Rashkova
{"title":"The substantive representation of social groups: towards a new comparative research agenda","authors":"Silvia Erzeel, E. Rashkova","doi":"10.1332/251510821x16635712428686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article maps the field of substantive representation of social groups and carves out a new research agenda. Examining a database of 313 publications, we identify patterns in what is studied in the field and how it is studied. Our findings suggest that while scholarship on the substantive representation of social groups has expanded over the years, many studies still predominantly (1) analyse the representation of women in (2) the governmental sphere, while adopting a focus on (3) a single country, (4) a single group and (5) a single axis. Comparative work across countries and groups is more scarce. We therefore argue in favour of a comparative research agenda that prioritises more cross-country and cross-group research on the substantive representation of social groups using pluralistic research methods. This direction offers distinct advantages for answering new research questions, exploring diversity in how the substantive representation of social groups takes place, identifying broader patterns across different contexts and groups, and formulating new explanations on the occurrence and quality of the substantive representation of social groups.","PeriodicalId":36315,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821x16635712428686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This article maps the field of substantive representation of social groups and carves out a new research agenda. Examining a database of 313 publications, we identify patterns in what is studied in the field and how it is studied. Our findings suggest that while scholarship on the substantive representation of social groups has expanded over the years, many studies still predominantly (1) analyse the representation of women in (2) the governmental sphere, while adopting a focus on (3) a single country, (4) a single group and (5) a single axis. Comparative work across countries and groups is more scarce. We therefore argue in favour of a comparative research agenda that prioritises more cross-country and cross-group research on the substantive representation of social groups using pluralistic research methods. This direction offers distinct advantages for answering new research questions, exploring diversity in how the substantive representation of social groups takes place, identifying broader patterns across different contexts and groups, and formulating new explanations on the occurrence and quality of the substantive representation of social groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会群体的实质代表性:走向新的比较研究议程
本文描绘了社会群体的实质代表性领域,并开辟了一个新的研究议程。通过检查313份出版物的数据库,我们确定了该领域研究的内容及其研究方式的模式。我们的研究结果表明,虽然多年来关于社会群体的实质性代表性的学术研究有所扩大,但许多研究仍然主要是(1)分析妇女在(2)政府领域的代表性,同时采用(3)单一国家,(4)单一群体和(5)单一轴的关注。跨国家和群体的比较研究更为稀缺。因此,我们赞成比较研究议程,优先考虑使用多元研究方法对社会群体的实质性代表性进行更多的跨国和跨群体研究。这一方向为回答新的研究问题、探索社会群体实质性代表性如何发生的多样性、在不同背景和群体中识别更广泛的模式、以及对社会群体实质性代表性的发生和质量提出新的解释提供了明显的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Politics and Gender
European Journal of Politics and Gender Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Translating difference: whiteness, racialisation and queer migration in Berlin Shifting equality from the margins: the Common European Asylum System and the making of trans rights in the European Union Translation as a cultural tool for mediating conflict in queer and feminist grassroots democratic coalitions in Denmark, Germany and Sweden Women’s issues, critical actors and the media: substantive representation of women and gendered media coverage in South Korea How anti-gender and gendered imagery translate the Great Replacement conspiracy theory in online far-right platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1