Wellbore trajectory optimization for horizontal wells: the plan versus the reality

Mohamed Halafawi, L. Avram
{"title":"Wellbore trajectory optimization for horizontal wells: the plan versus the reality","authors":"Mohamed Halafawi, L. Avram","doi":"10.30881/JOGPS.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Horizontal wellbore profile and trajectory optimization without hole problems are considered the most essential part in well planning and design. In this paper, a long radius horizontal well was trajectory optimized by selecting horizontal profile, kick off point (KOP), horizontal turn trajectory, vertical turn determination, and mud weights. After that, in order to design 3D profile, the Minimum Curvature Method (MCM)was used for survey determination. Moreover, the best well orientation was selected based on rock mechanics and wellbore stability so that the optimum trajectory could be drilled without instability problems. Real horizontal well passed through 5 targets: NRQ 255 6H-1, NRQ 255 6H-2, NRQ 255 6H-3, NRQ 255 6H-4, and NRQ 255 6H-5 are studied. The planned trajectory has found the same as real trajectory until 9 5/8” casing is landed to true vertical depth (TVD) =7230 ft. and measured depth (MD) =7343.6 ft. However, during drilling 8.5’’ hole, it was impossible to continue drilling due to the drillstring being stuck because of caved shale and hole pack off. Wellbore trajectory was redesigned and selected after building new wellbore stability and geomechanical stress models using logging while drilling (LWD) data. A 6’’ sidetrack hole was successfully drilled and hit the five targets horizontally.","PeriodicalId":93120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oil, gas and petrochemical sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oil, gas and petrochemical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30881/JOGPS.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Horizontal wellbore profile and trajectory optimization without hole problems are considered the most essential part in well planning and design. In this paper, a long radius horizontal well was trajectory optimized by selecting horizontal profile, kick off point (KOP), horizontal turn trajectory, vertical turn determination, and mud weights. After that, in order to design 3D profile, the Minimum Curvature Method (MCM)was used for survey determination. Moreover, the best well orientation was selected based on rock mechanics and wellbore stability so that the optimum trajectory could be drilled without instability problems. Real horizontal well passed through 5 targets: NRQ 255 6H-1, NRQ 255 6H-2, NRQ 255 6H-3, NRQ 255 6H-4, and NRQ 255 6H-5 are studied. The planned trajectory has found the same as real trajectory until 9 5/8” casing is landed to true vertical depth (TVD) =7230 ft. and measured depth (MD) =7343.6 ft. However, during drilling 8.5’’ hole, it was impossible to continue drilling due to the drillstring being stuck because of caved shale and hole pack off. Wellbore trajectory was redesigned and selected after building new wellbore stability and geomechanical stress models using logging while drilling (LWD) data. A 6’’ sidetrack hole was successfully drilled and hit the five targets horizontally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水平井井眼轨迹优化:计划与现实
无井眼问题的水平井眼剖面和轨迹优化是井眼规划和设计中最重要的部分。通过选择水平井水平剖面、起井点(KOP)、水平转弯轨迹、垂直转弯轨迹和泥浆比重,对长半径水平井进行了轨迹优化。然后,采用最小曲率法(MCM)进行测量确定,设计三维轮廓。此外,根据岩石力学和井筒稳定性选择最佳井眼方向,使最佳井眼轨迹不会出现失稳问题。研究了实际水平井通过NRQ 255 6H-1、NRQ 255 6H-2、NRQ 255 6H-3、NRQ 255 6H-4、NRQ 255 6H-5 5个靶区。在9 5/8”套管下入至真垂直深度(TVD) =7230英尺,测量深度(MD) =7343.6英尺之前,计划的轨迹与实际轨迹一致。然而,在钻探8.5”井眼时,由于页岩塌陷和井眼充填物导致钻柱卡钻,无法继续钻井。在利用随钻测井(LWD)数据建立新的井筒稳定性和地质力学应力模型后,重新设计并选择了井眼轨迹。成功地钻出了一个6英寸侧钻,并水平击中了5个目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Wellbore instability prediction and performance analysis using Poroelastic modeling" Comparison of Single, Binary and Temperature-Dependent Adsorption Models Based on Error Function Analysis Stochastic simulation of cavitation bubbles formation in the axial valve separator influenced by degree of opening Horizontal versus vertical wells interference in hydraulically fractured shale reservoirs Wellbore trajectory optimization for horizontal wells: the plan versus the reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1