{"title":"Sustainability appraisal of arsenic mitigation policy innovations in West Bengal, India","authors":"Soumyajit Koley","doi":"10.1680/jinam.21.00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment of arsenic–contaminated shallow groundwater upon extraction has become imperative to provide safe drinking water in remote villages in West Bengal, India. Arsenic Removal Plants (ARPs) stabilizing arsenic–rich wastewater ‘in–situ’, though save valuable time and money, require high technical expertise for operation and maintenance, which is difficult to facilitate in rural communities lacking necessary infrastructural support. Contrarily, Arsenic Removal Units (ARUs) have been widely accepted by the society for their user–friendliness. But, most of them produce high volume of hazardous sludge, safe commercial reuse of which can be done by ‘ex–situ’ stabilization with clay–bricks. Based on number of ARPs and ARUs needed to mitigate the households seeking remedy, a cost–benefit analysis of the remediation and waste management aspects is performed via system dynamics modeling. For a major arsenic–affected district of the state, simulation results suggest that in lieu of ARPs, installation of ARUs is deemed to be financially sustainable for at least 15 years from now, if the arsenic–laden bricks are sold at a price 20% higher than normal. Future projections of groundwater draft and stress in the region commensurately certify the economic and environmental sustainability of the arsenic remediation.","PeriodicalId":43387,"journal":{"name":"Infrastructure Asset Management","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrastructure Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.21.00021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32
Abstract
Treatment of arsenic–contaminated shallow groundwater upon extraction has become imperative to provide safe drinking water in remote villages in West Bengal, India. Arsenic Removal Plants (ARPs) stabilizing arsenic–rich wastewater ‘in–situ’, though save valuable time and money, require high technical expertise for operation and maintenance, which is difficult to facilitate in rural communities lacking necessary infrastructural support. Contrarily, Arsenic Removal Units (ARUs) have been widely accepted by the society for their user–friendliness. But, most of them produce high volume of hazardous sludge, safe commercial reuse of which can be done by ‘ex–situ’ stabilization with clay–bricks. Based on number of ARPs and ARUs needed to mitigate the households seeking remedy, a cost–benefit analysis of the remediation and waste management aspects is performed via system dynamics modeling. For a major arsenic–affected district of the state, simulation results suggest that in lieu of ARPs, installation of ARUs is deemed to be financially sustainable for at least 15 years from now, if the arsenic–laden bricks are sold at a price 20% higher than normal. Future projections of groundwater draft and stress in the region commensurately certify the economic and environmental sustainability of the arsenic remediation.