When Both Markets and Governments Fail Health

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems & Reform Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2019.1660756
A. Yazbeck, A. Soucat
{"title":"When Both Markets and Governments Fail Health","authors":"A. Yazbeck, A. Soucat","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2019.1660756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper presents the rationale and motivation for countries and the global development community to tackle a critical set of functions in the health sector that appear to be under-prioritized and underfunded. The recent eruptions of Ebola outbreaks in Africa and other communicable diseases like Zika and SARS elsewhere led scientific and medical commissions to call for global action. The calls for action motivated the World Health Organization (WHO) to respond by defining a new construct within the health sector: Common Good for Health (CGH). While the starting point for developing the CGH construct was the re-emergence of communicable diseases, it extends to additional outcomes resulting from failures to act and finance within and outside the health sector. This paper summarizes global evidence on failures to address CGHs effectively, identifies potential reasons for the public and private sectors’ failures to respond, and lays out the first phase of the WHO program as represented by the papers in this special issue of Health Systems & Reform.","PeriodicalId":46168,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems & Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems & Reform","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1660756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the rationale and motivation for countries and the global development community to tackle a critical set of functions in the health sector that appear to be under-prioritized and underfunded. The recent eruptions of Ebola outbreaks in Africa and other communicable diseases like Zika and SARS elsewhere led scientific and medical commissions to call for global action. The calls for action motivated the World Health Organization (WHO) to respond by defining a new construct within the health sector: Common Good for Health (CGH). While the starting point for developing the CGH construct was the re-emergence of communicable diseases, it extends to additional outcomes resulting from failures to act and finance within and outside the health sector. This paper summarizes global evidence on failures to address CGHs effectively, identifies potential reasons for the public and private sectors’ failures to respond, and lays out the first phase of the WHO program as represented by the papers in this special issue of Health Systems & Reform.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当市场和政府都不健康时
本文提出了各国和全球发展界处理卫生部门一系列关键职能的基本原理和动机,这些职能似乎没有得到充分重视和资金不足。最近在非洲爆发的埃博拉疫情,以及其他地区爆发的寨卡和SARS等其他传染病,促使科学和医学委员会呼吁采取全球行动。采取行动的呼吁促使世界卫生组织(世卫组织)作出回应,在卫生部门内定义了一个新的结构:健康共同利益。虽然发展社区卫生保健结构的出发点是传染病的重新出现,但它延伸到由于卫生部门内外未能采取行动和提供资金而产生的其他结果。本文总结了关于未能有效解决CGHs的全球证据,确定了公共和私营部门未能作出反应的潜在原因,并以本期《卫生系统与改革》特刊中的论文为代表,阐述了世卫组织规划的第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strengths and Weaknesses of Strategic Health Purchasing for Universal Health Coverage in Rwanda Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Mapping: A Spotlight on Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme Strategic Health Purchasing in Nigeria: Investigating Governance and Institutional Capacities within Federal Tax-Funded Health Schemes and the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme Integrating Venezuelan Migrants into the Colombian Health System during COVID-19 Decentralization Can Improve Equity, but Can It Be Sustained?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1