Treatment pattern and overall survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus over two decades: A single institutional experience

Shahida Nasreen, Shaiba Hussain, Asifa Andleeb, A. Manzoor, K. Fatima, M. Sofi
{"title":"Treatment pattern and overall survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus over two decades: A single institutional experience","authors":"Shahida Nasreen, Shaiba Hussain, Asifa Andleeb, A. Manzoor, K. Fatima, M. Sofi","doi":"10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_44_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Kashmir Valley of India lies at the edge of the “Asian esophageal cancer belt.” A number of treatment modalities have been delivered to the patients of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at our Regional Cancer Centre. We considered it worthwhile to analyze the outcome of all these modalities. Materials and Methods: In the Department of Radiation Oncology of our institute, retrospective analysis of 2090 patients was done, who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus from 1993 to 2013. Of these 2090 cases, only 1337 patients only completed the treatment. Seven hundred and fifty-three patients either did not report for treatment after registration or did not complete the treatment. These 1337 patients were reviewed in terms of dysphagia relief, local disease control, distant metastasis, and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years. They were grouped into 14 different groups as per the treatment received from A to N. Results: Fourteen different treatment modalities have been used at our center from 1993 to 2013. The overall percentage of local recurrence was 14.95%, highest being in Group L (26.65) and nil in Group M. About 32.57% of patients developed distance metastasis, highest (50%) in Group J, and nil in Group M. The most common site of failure was the supraclavicular nodes (7%), followed by the bone, liver, lung, and brain. OS at 1 and 2 years was 51.86% and 20.55%, respectively. However, it could not designate any particular modality as the best for treating patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Conclusion: We concluded from our study that the most common failure in squamous cell carcinoma esophagus is the distant metastasis. Local recurrences are least in patients who underwent surgery. Unfortunately, we could not point out a single group from the study which could be deemed as the best treatment modality for carcinoma esophagus.","PeriodicalId":16923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_44_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Kashmir Valley of India lies at the edge of the “Asian esophageal cancer belt.” A number of treatment modalities have been delivered to the patients of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at our Regional Cancer Centre. We considered it worthwhile to analyze the outcome of all these modalities. Materials and Methods: In the Department of Radiation Oncology of our institute, retrospective analysis of 2090 patients was done, who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus from 1993 to 2013. Of these 2090 cases, only 1337 patients only completed the treatment. Seven hundred and fifty-three patients either did not report for treatment after registration or did not complete the treatment. These 1337 patients were reviewed in terms of dysphagia relief, local disease control, distant metastasis, and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years. They were grouped into 14 different groups as per the treatment received from A to N. Results: Fourteen different treatment modalities have been used at our center from 1993 to 2013. The overall percentage of local recurrence was 14.95%, highest being in Group L (26.65) and nil in Group M. About 32.57% of patients developed distance metastasis, highest (50%) in Group J, and nil in Group M. The most common site of failure was the supraclavicular nodes (7%), followed by the bone, liver, lung, and brain. OS at 1 and 2 years was 51.86% and 20.55%, respectively. However, it could not designate any particular modality as the best for treating patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Conclusion: We concluded from our study that the most common failure in squamous cell carcinoma esophagus is the distant metastasis. Local recurrences are least in patients who underwent surgery. Unfortunately, we could not point out a single group from the study which could be deemed as the best treatment modality for carcinoma esophagus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二十年来食管鳞状细胞癌的治疗模式和总生存率:一个单一的机构经验
导读:印度克什米尔山谷位于“亚洲食管癌带”边缘。在我们的区域癌症中心,一些治疗方式已经交付给食管鳞状细胞癌患者。我们认为分析所有这些方式的结果是值得的。材料与方法:对我院放射肿瘤科1993 - 2013年诊断为食管非转移性鳞状细胞癌的2090例患者进行回顾性分析。在这2090例病例中,只有1337例患者完成了治疗。753名患者在登记后没有报告治疗或没有完成治疗。这1337例患者在1年和2年的吞咽困难缓解、局部疾病控制、远处转移和总生存期(OS)方面进行了回顾。结果:1993 - 2013年我中心共采用了14种不同的治疗方式。总体局部复发率为14.95%,L组最高(26.65%),m组为零。约32.57%的患者发生远处转移,J组最高(50%),m组为零。最常见的转移部位为锁骨上淋巴结(7%),其次为骨、肝、肺和脑。1年和2年生存率分别为51.86%和20.55%。然而,它不能指定任何特定的模式是最好的治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的患者。结论:食管鳞状细胞癌最常见的失败是远处转移。接受手术的患者局部复发最少。不幸的是,我们无法从研究中指出哪一组可以被视为食管癌的最佳治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Re-irradiation in High-grade Glioma: An Experience from A Series of Five Patients Artificial Intelligence Assistive Tool for Radiotherapy Plan Evaluation Based on Analysis of Integral Dose Rhabdoid Differentiation in Wilms Tumor Osseous Leiomyosarcoma: A Rare Entity Association of Positive Family History and Clinicopathological Features in Breast Cancer in Young Indian Females – A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1