Validity Analysis of Wii Balance Board Versus Baropodometer Platform Using an Open Custom Integrated Application

Francesco Sgrò , Giuseppe Monteleone , Marica Pavone , Mario Lipoma
{"title":"Validity Analysis of Wii Balance Board Versus Baropodometer Platform Using an Open Custom Integrated Application","authors":"Francesco Sgrò ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Monteleone ,&nbsp;Marica Pavone ,&nbsp;Mario Lipoma","doi":"10.1016/j.aasri.2014.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Standing balance tests represent the most common way to assess person's functional ability and they were realized by means of specialized and expensive platforms, especially in clinicians’ environments. Wii Balance Board (WBB) is video-game based device that measures center of pressure (CoP) oscillations and it showed promising performance compared with ‘gold standard’ force platforms. In this paper we propose an open integrated custom application to define balance outcomes using WBB. These outcomes were used to execute a validity analysis of WBB performance compared with baropodometer platform (BP). Ten subjects performed two standing balance tests with open and closed eyes respectively on WBB and BP in separate occasion. Validity analysis was carried out using r-Pearson correlation coefficient, ICC analysis, paired-sample t-Test and Bland-Altman plots. Results confirmed that the WBB, although has a fraction of cost of other platforms, represents a tool suitable for some clinician analysis</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100008,"journal":{"name":"AASRI Procedia","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aasri.2014.08.005","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AASRI Procedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212671614000729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Standing balance tests represent the most common way to assess person's functional ability and they were realized by means of specialized and expensive platforms, especially in clinicians’ environments. Wii Balance Board (WBB) is video-game based device that measures center of pressure (CoP) oscillations and it showed promising performance compared with ‘gold standard’ force platforms. In this paper we propose an open integrated custom application to define balance outcomes using WBB. These outcomes were used to execute a validity analysis of WBB performance compared with baropodometer platform (BP). Ten subjects performed two standing balance tests with open and closed eyes respectively on WBB and BP in separate occasion. Validity analysis was carried out using r-Pearson correlation coefficient, ICC analysis, paired-sample t-Test and Bland-Altman plots. Results confirmed that the WBB, although has a fraction of cost of other platforms, represents a tool suitable for some clinician analysis

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于开放定制集成应用的Wii平衡板与气压计平台有效性分析
站立平衡测试是评估人的功能能力最常见的方法,它们是通过专业和昂贵的平台实现的,特别是在临床医生的环境中。Wii平衡板(WBB)是一种基于视频游戏的设备,可以测量压力中心(CoP)振荡,与“黄金标准”力平台相比,它表现出了很好的性能。在本文中,我们提出了一个开放的集成自定义应用程序来定义使用WBB的平衡结果。这些结果用于对WBB性能与气压计平台(BP)进行有效性分析。10名受试者分别在不同场合进行睁眼和闭眼站立平衡测试。效度分析采用r-Pearson相关系数、ICC分析、配对样本t检验和Bland-Altman图。结果证实,尽管WBB的成本只有其他平台的一小部分,但它是一种适合临床医生分析的工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface Preface Preface Preface Classification of Wild Animals based on SVM and Local Descriptors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1