João Henrique Fonseca do Nascimento, Selton Cavalcante Tomaz, A. R. De Azevedo, A. G. Cunha, André Bouzas de Andrade
{"title":"Pedagogical impact of internal training applied to the Academic League of Internal and Surgical Medicine","authors":"João Henrique Fonseca do Nascimento, Selton Cavalcante Tomaz, A. R. De Azevedo, A. G. Cunha, André Bouzas de Andrade","doi":"10.17267/2594-7907IJHE.V5I1.3564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Academic Leagues of Medicine are extracurricular activities, which recognize the student’s protagonism in knowledge's production, such as training and teaching-learning experiences developed by students. OBJECTIVE: To assess the training’s efficiency in surgical technique applied at the Academic League of Internal and Surgical Medicine (LAMIC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the effect of the LAMIC’s training promoted to its associated students, comparing them to a non-exposed group. A questionnaire was used as an evaluation tool. It contained 20 objective questions and all students had up to 30 minutes to answer it. The 60% mark of correct answers was set as a threshold for considering proficient knowledge. For statistical analyses, Mann-Whiney U test and Fisher's exact test were performed, adopting p<0.01 as significant. RESULTS: Sixty-nine students composed the sample population, whom 24 LAMIC-students were exposed to internal training and 45 non-exposed students. Among LAMIC-students, 91.7% had supraliminal results, while only 2.2% of non-exposed students reached this mark (p<0.01; odds ratio, OR = 354.8). There was statistically significant association between LAMIC-students’ results and good performance in: fundamentals in surgery (p<0.01, OR = 5.0), surgical risk assessment (p<0.01, OR = 3.4), patient (p<0.01, OR = 183.5) and surgical team (p<0.01, OR = 9.6) positioning, surgical center (p<0.01, OR = 84.0), and instrumentation (p<0.01, OR = 125.3). CONCLUSION: Participation in internal training promoted by the academic league fostered better results in surgical knowledge, corroborating the concept that student’s leadership in teaching experiences may contribute to a better learning experience and medical formation.","PeriodicalId":75938,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health education","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17267/2594-7907IJHE.V5I1.3564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Academic Leagues of Medicine are extracurricular activities, which recognize the student’s protagonism in knowledge's production, such as training and teaching-learning experiences developed by students. OBJECTIVE: To assess the training’s efficiency in surgical technique applied at the Academic League of Internal and Surgical Medicine (LAMIC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the effect of the LAMIC’s training promoted to its associated students, comparing them to a non-exposed group. A questionnaire was used as an evaluation tool. It contained 20 objective questions and all students had up to 30 minutes to answer it. The 60% mark of correct answers was set as a threshold for considering proficient knowledge. For statistical analyses, Mann-Whiney U test and Fisher's exact test were performed, adopting p<0.01 as significant. RESULTS: Sixty-nine students composed the sample population, whom 24 LAMIC-students were exposed to internal training and 45 non-exposed students. Among LAMIC-students, 91.7% had supraliminal results, while only 2.2% of non-exposed students reached this mark (p<0.01; odds ratio, OR = 354.8). There was statistically significant association between LAMIC-students’ results and good performance in: fundamentals in surgery (p<0.01, OR = 5.0), surgical risk assessment (p<0.01, OR = 3.4), patient (p<0.01, OR = 183.5) and surgical team (p<0.01, OR = 9.6) positioning, surgical center (p<0.01, OR = 84.0), and instrumentation (p<0.01, OR = 125.3). CONCLUSION: Participation in internal training promoted by the academic league fostered better results in surgical knowledge, corroborating the concept that student’s leadership in teaching experiences may contribute to a better learning experience and medical formation.
简介:医学学术联盟是一种课外活动,它承认学生在知识生产中的主角地位,如学生的培训和教学经验。目的:评价内外科学术联盟(LAMIC)外科技术培训的效果。方法和材料:我们评估了LAMIC对其相关学生的培训效果,并将他们与未暴露组进行比较。采用问卷作为评估工具。它包含20个客观问题,所有学生有30分钟的时间来回答。60%的正确答案被设定为考虑知识精通的门槛。统计学分析采用Mann-Whiney U检验和Fisher精确检验,p<0.01为显著性。结果:69名学生组成样本人群,其中24名lamic学生接受内训,45名未接受内训。在lamic学生中,91.7%的学生达到了优等成绩,而非暴露学生中只有2.2%达到了优等成绩(p<0.01;优势比,OR = 354.8)。lamic学生的成绩与手术基础(p<0.01, OR = 5.0)、手术风险评估(p<0.01, OR = 3.4)、患者(p<0.01, OR = 183.5)和手术团队(p<0.01, OR = 9.6)、体位、手术中心(p<0.01, OR = 84.0)、器械(p<0.01, OR = 125.3)的良好表现有统计学意义。结论:参与学术联盟推动的内训对外科知识的学习效果更好,印证了学生主导教学经验有助于更好的学习体验和医学形成。