Pedagogical impact of internal training applied to the Academic League of Internal and Surgical Medicine

João Henrique Fonseca do Nascimento, Selton Cavalcante Tomaz, A. R. De Azevedo, A. G. Cunha, André Bouzas de Andrade
{"title":"Pedagogical impact of internal training applied to the Academic League of Internal and Surgical Medicine","authors":"João Henrique Fonseca do Nascimento, Selton Cavalcante Tomaz, A. R. De Azevedo, A. G. Cunha, André Bouzas de Andrade","doi":"10.17267/2594-7907IJHE.V5I1.3564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Academic Leagues of Medicine are extracurricular activities, which recognize the student’s protagonism in knowledge's production, such as training and teaching-learning experiences developed by students.  OBJECTIVE: To assess the training’s efficiency in surgical technique applied at the Academic League of Internal and Surgical Medicine (LAMIC).  METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the effect of the LAMIC’s training promoted to its associated students, comparing them to a non-exposed group. A questionnaire was used as an evaluation tool. It contained 20 objective questions and all students had up to 30 minutes to answer it. The 60% mark of correct answers was set as a threshold for considering proficient knowledge. For statistical analyses, Mann-Whiney U test and Fisher's exact test were performed, adopting p<0.01 as significant.  RESULTS: Sixty-nine students composed the sample population, whom 24 LAMIC-students were exposed to internal training and 45 non-exposed students. Among LAMIC-students, 91.7% had supraliminal results, while only 2.2% of non-exposed students reached this mark (p<0.01; odds ratio, OR = 354.8). There was statistically significant association between LAMIC-students’ results and good performance in: fundamentals in surgery (p<0.01, OR = 5.0), surgical risk assessment (p<0.01, OR = 3.4), patient (p<0.01, OR = 183.5) and surgical team (p<0.01, OR = 9.6) positioning, surgical center (p<0.01, OR = 84.0), and instrumentation (p<0.01, OR = 125.3).  CONCLUSION: Participation in internal training promoted by the academic league fostered better results in surgical knowledge, corroborating the concept that student’s leadership in teaching experiences may contribute to a better learning experience and medical formation.","PeriodicalId":75938,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health education","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17267/2594-7907IJHE.V5I1.3564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Academic Leagues of Medicine are extracurricular activities, which recognize the student’s protagonism in knowledge's production, such as training and teaching-learning experiences developed by students.  OBJECTIVE: To assess the training’s efficiency in surgical technique applied at the Academic League of Internal and Surgical Medicine (LAMIC).  METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the effect of the LAMIC’s training promoted to its associated students, comparing them to a non-exposed group. A questionnaire was used as an evaluation tool. It contained 20 objective questions and all students had up to 30 minutes to answer it. The 60% mark of correct answers was set as a threshold for considering proficient knowledge. For statistical analyses, Mann-Whiney U test and Fisher's exact test were performed, adopting p<0.01 as significant.  RESULTS: Sixty-nine students composed the sample population, whom 24 LAMIC-students were exposed to internal training and 45 non-exposed students. Among LAMIC-students, 91.7% had supraliminal results, while only 2.2% of non-exposed students reached this mark (p<0.01; odds ratio, OR = 354.8). There was statistically significant association between LAMIC-students’ results and good performance in: fundamentals in surgery (p<0.01, OR = 5.0), surgical risk assessment (p<0.01, OR = 3.4), patient (p<0.01, OR = 183.5) and surgical team (p<0.01, OR = 9.6) positioning, surgical center (p<0.01, OR = 84.0), and instrumentation (p<0.01, OR = 125.3).  CONCLUSION: Participation in internal training promoted by the academic league fostered better results in surgical knowledge, corroborating the concept that student’s leadership in teaching experiences may contribute to a better learning experience and medical formation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用于内科和外科医学学术联盟的内训教学影响
简介:医学学术联盟是一种课外活动,它承认学生在知识生产中的主角地位,如学生的培训和教学经验。目的:评价内外科学术联盟(LAMIC)外科技术培训的效果。方法和材料:我们评估了LAMIC对其相关学生的培训效果,并将他们与未暴露组进行比较。采用问卷作为评估工具。它包含20个客观问题,所有学生有30分钟的时间来回答。60%的正确答案被设定为考虑知识精通的门槛。统计学分析采用Mann-Whiney U检验和Fisher精确检验,p<0.01为显著性。结果:69名学生组成样本人群,其中24名lamic学生接受内训,45名未接受内训。在lamic学生中,91.7%的学生达到了优等成绩,而非暴露学生中只有2.2%达到了优等成绩(p<0.01;优势比,OR = 354.8)。lamic学生的成绩与手术基础(p<0.01, OR = 5.0)、手术风险评估(p<0.01, OR = 3.4)、患者(p<0.01, OR = 183.5)和手术团队(p<0.01, OR = 9.6)、体位、手术中心(p<0.01, OR = 84.0)、器械(p<0.01, OR = 125.3)的良好表现有统计学意义。结论:参与学术联盟推动的内训对外科知识的学习效果更好,印证了学生主导教学经验有助于更好的学习体验和医学形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge of medical students about perioperative nutritional care in Bahia, Brazil: a transversal study A relação entre a vida acadêmica e a vida familiar do estudante de medicina: uma análise transversal Potentialities and weaknesses of Education and Interprofessional Work in health: perspectives of professionals in Northeast Brazil Evaluation of the simulation design scale in medical students Pedagogical impact of internal training applied to the Academic League of Internal and Surgical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1