Attitudes to Improving Speaking Skills by Guided Individual Activities

G. Kavaliauskienė, Ligija Kaminskienė
{"title":"Attitudes to Improving Speaking Skills by Guided Individual Activities","authors":"G. Kavaliauskienė, Ligija Kaminskienė","doi":"10.3846/CPE.2014.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students’ perceptions of difficulties in speaking on professional issues are in the focus of the present article. It is generally assumed that the skill of speaking a foreign language is very difficult to master, while speaking on professional topics involves such difficulties as the usage of specific vocabulary and ability to deal with listeners’ oncoming arguments. The aims of the current research are to investigate learners’ attitudes to the level of difficulty in speaking activi - ties on a subject matter at university and apply an innovative approach to improving their speaking skills. The methodology applied was focused on guided individual learning (GIL), with gradually increasing amount of spontaneity in public talks on the subject matter, starting with prepared short talks on an ESP issue leading to group discussions; moving on to Power Point presentations, involving spontaneous deviations from the subject and followed by question time; further, adding some complex subject matter, such as a discussion on a problematic professional subject suggested by learning materials; and, eventually, speaking impromptu on an issue, with a high level of control of one’s speaking skills. The research method of the learners’ attitudes employed the survey on learner attitudes to four different speaking activities in the classroom, which included short talks, Power Point Presentations, discussions and speaking impromptu. The questionnaire was administered to students of two different specializations by the end of the semester. The respondents were students who studied Psychology and Social Work at the Faculty of Social Policy, at Mykolas Romeris University in Vilnius, Lithuania. The respondents were asked to indicate the degree of difficulty they had with the various speaking activities on the Likert’s scale ranging from “very difficult” (1) to “very easy” (5). The results indicated that perceptions of difficulties to developing speaking skills depended, on the one hand, on students’ chosen specialization: students of Psychology were more positive about speaking activities than students of Social Work. The differences of opinions might be caused by the level of proficiency in General English which influences the performance in professional language. On the other hand, the responses depended on the type of assignments: students felt more confident with themselves if they invested more individual learning time for their assignments. By the end of the semester, students self-assessed their achievements in improving speaking skills by contributing written reflections to individual weblogs. The analysis of contributions suggests the usefulness of the approach to perfecting professional speaking skills.","PeriodicalId":53267,"journal":{"name":"Santalka Filosofija Komunikacija","volume":"16 1","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santalka Filosofija Komunikacija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/CPE.2014.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Students’ perceptions of difficulties in speaking on professional issues are in the focus of the present article. It is generally assumed that the skill of speaking a foreign language is very difficult to master, while speaking on professional topics involves such difficulties as the usage of specific vocabulary and ability to deal with listeners’ oncoming arguments. The aims of the current research are to investigate learners’ attitudes to the level of difficulty in speaking activi - ties on a subject matter at university and apply an innovative approach to improving their speaking skills. The methodology applied was focused on guided individual learning (GIL), with gradually increasing amount of spontaneity in public talks on the subject matter, starting with prepared short talks on an ESP issue leading to group discussions; moving on to Power Point presentations, involving spontaneous deviations from the subject and followed by question time; further, adding some complex subject matter, such as a discussion on a problematic professional subject suggested by learning materials; and, eventually, speaking impromptu on an issue, with a high level of control of one’s speaking skills. The research method of the learners’ attitudes employed the survey on learner attitudes to four different speaking activities in the classroom, which included short talks, Power Point Presentations, discussions and speaking impromptu. The questionnaire was administered to students of two different specializations by the end of the semester. The respondents were students who studied Psychology and Social Work at the Faculty of Social Policy, at Mykolas Romeris University in Vilnius, Lithuania. The respondents were asked to indicate the degree of difficulty they had with the various speaking activities on the Likert’s scale ranging from “very difficult” (1) to “very easy” (5). The results indicated that perceptions of difficulties to developing speaking skills depended, on the one hand, on students’ chosen specialization: students of Psychology were more positive about speaking activities than students of Social Work. The differences of opinions might be caused by the level of proficiency in General English which influences the performance in professional language. On the other hand, the responses depended on the type of assignments: students felt more confident with themselves if they invested more individual learning time for their assignments. By the end of the semester, students self-assessed their achievements in improving speaking skills by contributing written reflections to individual weblogs. The analysis of contributions suggests the usefulness of the approach to perfecting professional speaking skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过有指导的个人活动提高口语能力的态度
学生对在专业问题上发言困难的看法是本文的重点。人们普遍认为说外语的技能很难掌握,而在专业话题上发表演讲则涉及到使用特定词汇和处理听众迎面而来的争论的能力等困难。本研究的目的是调查学生对大学某一主题的口语活动的难度程度的态度,并运用一种创新的方法来提高他们的口语技能。所采用的方法侧重于引导个人学习(GIL),在主题的公开演讲中逐渐增加自发性,从准备好的关于ESP问题的简短演讲开始,然后进行小组讨论;接下来是幻灯片演示,包括自发偏离主题,然后是提问时间;进一步,增加一些复杂的主题,例如对学习材料中提出的有问题的专业主题进行讨论;最后,对一个问题进行即兴演讲,对自己的演讲技巧有很高的控制水平。学习者态度的研究方法是对学习者对四种不同的课堂口语活动的态度进行调查,这四种活动包括简短谈话、ppt演讲、讨论和即兴演讲。在学期结束时,调查问卷被发给了两个不同专业的学生。受访者是立陶宛维尔纽斯米科拉斯罗梅里斯大学社会政策学院心理学和社会工作专业的学生。受访者被要求指出他们在李克特量表上从“非常困难”(1)到“非常容易”(5)的各种口语活动的困难程度。结果表明,对发展口语技能的困难的看法一方面取决于学生选择的专业:心理学专业的学生比社会工作专业的学生对口语活动更积极。这种观点的差异可能是由于普通英语的熟练程度造成的,从而影响了专业语言的表现。另一方面,反应取决于作业的类型:如果学生在作业上投入更多的个人学习时间,他们会对自己更有信心。到学期结束时,学生们通过在个人博客上发表书面反思来自我评估他们在提高口语技能方面取得的成就。对贡献的分析表明,这种方法对完善专业演讲技能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Practical and Academic Application for Knowledge of Lanquage for Specific Purposes The Development of the Standard Lithuanian Language: Ecolinguistic Approach LEXICAL FEATURES OF SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE Application of the Elements of Problem-Based Learning in Professional Foreign Language Studies at LUHS Analysis of Adaptation of Smartphone Operating Systems for Work in the Lithuanian Linguistic Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1