Covid-19 Response and Protracted Exclusion of Informal Settlement Residents in Freetown, Sierra Leone

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies Pub Date : 2021-03-30 DOI:10.19088/1968-2021.108
A. Conteh, M. S. Kamara, S. Saidu, J. Macarthy
{"title":"Covid-19 Response and Protracted Exclusion of Informal Settlement Residents in Freetown, Sierra Leone","authors":"A. Conteh, M. S. Kamara, S. Saidu, J. Macarthy","doi":"10.19088/1968-2021.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freetown has over 1 million residents, many of whom live in about 68 crowded informal settlements Residents of these settlements struggle daily to access basic services such as water, sanitation, and health-care services We found that the government’s Covid-19 response measures (curfews, lockdowns, and travel restrictions) excluded informal residents from contributing to its design, and the implementation of these measures prevented these residents from accessing basic services Like the urban planning processes in Freetown, the Covid-19 response planning was done with the limited inclusion of informal residents, and not considering how these response measures would affect their livelihood priorities The economic conditions of already vulnerable people such as those living with disabilities, beggars, and women heads of households worsened as a result of these measures While these challenges were dire, communities were resilient in reversing the spread of Covid-19 through tailor-made messaging and by supporting the most vulnerable with food and basic needs In this article we argue that the inclusion of the urban poor in decision-making and urban planning processes can improve service delivery and their ability to cope with health shocks © 2021 The Authors IDS Bulletin © Institute of Development Studies","PeriodicalId":47532,"journal":{"name":"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2021.108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Freetown has over 1 million residents, many of whom live in about 68 crowded informal settlements Residents of these settlements struggle daily to access basic services such as water, sanitation, and health-care services We found that the government’s Covid-19 response measures (curfews, lockdowns, and travel restrictions) excluded informal residents from contributing to its design, and the implementation of these measures prevented these residents from accessing basic services Like the urban planning processes in Freetown, the Covid-19 response planning was done with the limited inclusion of informal residents, and not considering how these response measures would affect their livelihood priorities The economic conditions of already vulnerable people such as those living with disabilities, beggars, and women heads of households worsened as a result of these measures While these challenges were dire, communities were resilient in reversing the spread of Covid-19 through tailor-made messaging and by supporting the most vulnerable with food and basic needs In this article we argue that the inclusion of the urban poor in decision-making and urban planning processes can improve service delivery and their ability to cope with health shocks © 2021 The Authors IDS Bulletin © Institute of Development Studies
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞拉利昂弗里敦应对Covid-19和长期排斥非正规住区居民
弗里敦有100多万居民,其中许多人生活在大约68个拥挤的非正式定居点,这些定居点的居民每天都在努力获得水、卫生设施和医疗保健服务等基本服务。我们发现,政府的Covid-19应对措施(宵禁、封锁和旅行限制)将非正式居民排除在其设计之外。这些措施的实施使这些居民无法获得基本服务。与弗里敦的城市规划过程一样,Covid-19应对规划的制定也没有将非正式居民纳入其中,也没有考虑到这些应对措施将如何影响他们的生计优先事项。这些措施使女性户主状况恶化,虽然这些挑战很严峻,通过量身定制的信息传递以及为最弱势群体提供粮食和基本需求支持,社区在扭转Covid-19蔓延方面表现出了韧性。本文认为,将城市贫困人口纳入决策和城市规划过程可以改善服务提供,提高他们应对健康冲击的能力©2021作者IDS公报©发展研究所
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The IDS Bulletin is the flagship publication of the Institute of Development Studies, UK, which is a leading global organisation for research, teaching and communications on international development. With its over 40 year history the Bulletin has a unique reputation for intellectually rigorous articles on emerging and evolving development issues presented in an accessible manner, and has become one of the leading journals in its field through engaged scholarship between academic and policy communities in the North and the South. It brings together the latest cutting-edge thinking and research from programmes and events involving the IDS community and presents them to an audience of development practitioners, policymakers and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Introducción: Lecciones para la investigación sobre respuestas a emergencias impulsada a nivel local نظم الحماية الاجتماعية في المنطقة العربية: التحديات أمام إجراء البحوث وسن السياسات Notes on Contributors Lessons Learned from Mobilising Research for Impact During the Covid-19 Pandemic (Re)pensar un modelo de investigación colaborativa después del Covid-19: presentación de Colabora.Lat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1