Hand-portable gas-detector array (GDA) for rapid field detection and identification of chemical threat

G. Matz, T. Hunte, W. Schroeder
{"title":"Hand-portable gas-detector array (GDA) for rapid field detection and identification of chemical threat","authors":"G. Matz,&nbsp;T. Hunte,&nbsp;W. Schroeder","doi":"10.1002/1520-6521(2000)4:4<195::AID-FACT4>3.0.CO;2-K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the case of accidents at chemical plants, during transportation of chemicals or during terrorist attacks, hazardous compounds may be released and may harm emergency personnel and population. To prevent this a simple chemical hazard monitor is required to help locate the dangerous area, its border, and the safe area, as recently pointed out by Overton<sup>1</sup> in a FACT editorial.</p><p>Normally, only one or a few compounds are released, but a wide range of compounds has to be considered and must be measurable. In such cases, single-compound detectors may not provide any information or may provide misleading information. Alternative systems that determine sum parameters will give insufficient information to make a decision plan for environmental-protection activities or intervention by firefighters. However, there is always the danger of failing to detect important toxic substances if only one sensing technology is used.</p><p>In principle, all relevant compounds can be measured at low concentrations by laboratory analysis. However, techniques for task forces in the field are usually limited to simple equipment<sup>2,3</sup> and are useful for only a limited range of substances. Making laboratory analytical techniques available to the firefighter is the first successful step in accident analysis. However, devices such as mobile GC/MS and optical systems<sup>4,5</sup> need to be operated by specially trained personnel. Furthermore, because of relatively high costs only few special-purpose forces use this equipment.</p><p>Given the large amount of chemical hazardous compounds produced nowadays and the frequency of accidents reported in the past and anticipated accidents in the future, guidelines with lists of the major fraction of hazardous substances have been established in the United States (Emergency Response Planning Guidelines, ERPG2<sup>6</sup>) and in Germany (Einsatz Toleranz-Werte: ETW, tolerable concentration values<sup>7</sup>). In addition to the substances in these lists, chemical warfare agents have to be considered, for example, in the case of terrorism.</p><p>Detecting these substances in the field has been the objective of incident detection and measurement device developments. One result of our development efforts is the portable gas detector array (GDA). Its analytical task, selected sensors, signal interpretation, and measuring strategy as well as first experiences from the fire brigades using the prototype instruments are presented here. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 4: 195–203, 2000</p>","PeriodicalId":100527,"journal":{"name":"Field Analytical Chemistry & Technology","volume":"4 4","pages":"195-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1520-6521(2000)4:4<195::AID-FACT4>3.0.CO;2-K","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Analytical Chemistry & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1520-6521%282000%294%3A4%3C195%3A%3AAID-FACT4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

In the case of accidents at chemical plants, during transportation of chemicals or during terrorist attacks, hazardous compounds may be released and may harm emergency personnel and population. To prevent this a simple chemical hazard monitor is required to help locate the dangerous area, its border, and the safe area, as recently pointed out by Overton1 in a FACT editorial.

Normally, only one or a few compounds are released, but a wide range of compounds has to be considered and must be measurable. In such cases, single-compound detectors may not provide any information or may provide misleading information. Alternative systems that determine sum parameters will give insufficient information to make a decision plan for environmental-protection activities or intervention by firefighters. However, there is always the danger of failing to detect important toxic substances if only one sensing technology is used.

In principle, all relevant compounds can be measured at low concentrations by laboratory analysis. However, techniques for task forces in the field are usually limited to simple equipment2,3 and are useful for only a limited range of substances. Making laboratory analytical techniques available to the firefighter is the first successful step in accident analysis. However, devices such as mobile GC/MS and optical systems4,5 need to be operated by specially trained personnel. Furthermore, because of relatively high costs only few special-purpose forces use this equipment.

Given the large amount of chemical hazardous compounds produced nowadays and the frequency of accidents reported in the past and anticipated accidents in the future, guidelines with lists of the major fraction of hazardous substances have been established in the United States (Emergency Response Planning Guidelines, ERPG26) and in Germany (Einsatz Toleranz-Werte: ETW, tolerable concentration values7). In addition to the substances in these lists, chemical warfare agents have to be considered, for example, in the case of terrorism.

Detecting these substances in the field has been the objective of incident detection and measurement device developments. One result of our development efforts is the portable gas detector array (GDA). Its analytical task, selected sensors, signal interpretation, and measuring strategy as well as first experiences from the fire brigades using the prototype instruments are presented here. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 4: 195–203, 2000

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
便携式气体探测器阵列(GDA)用于快速现场检测和识别化学威胁
在化工厂发生事故、在运输化学品或在恐怖袭击期间,可能会释放出危险化合物,并可能伤害应急人员和人口。正如Overton1最近在FACT社论中指出的那样,为了防止这种情况发生,需要一个简单的化学危害监测器来帮助定位危险区域、其边界和安全区域。通常,只释放一种或几种化合物,但必须考虑到广泛的化合物,并且必须是可测量的。在这种情况下,单一化合物探测器可能不提供任何信息或可能提供误导性信息。确定总和参数的替代系统将不能提供足够的信息来制定环境保护活动或消防员干预的决策计划。然而,如果只使用一种传感技术,总是存在无法检测到重要有毒物质的危险。原则上,所有相关化合物都可以通过实验室分析在低浓度下测量。但是,实地工作队使用的技术通常限于简单的设备2、3,而且只适用于有限范围的物质。使消防人员能够使用实验室分析技术是事故分析成功的第一步。然而,诸如移动GC/MS和光学系统4,5之类的设备需要由受过专门培训的人员操作。此外,由于费用相对较高,只有少数特种部队使用这种设备。鉴于目前产生的大量有害化学化合物以及过去报告的事故和未来预计的事故的频率,美国(应急反应规划准则,ERPG26)和德国(Einsatz tolerz - werte: ETW,可容忍的浓度值)已经制定了列出主要有害物质部分清单的准则。除了这些清单上的物质外,还必须考虑化学战剂,例如在恐怖主义的情况下。在现场检测这些物质一直是事件检测和测量设备发展的目标。我们努力开发的一个成果是便携式气体探测器阵列(GDA)。本文介绍了它的分析任务、选定的传感器、信号解释和测量策略,以及消防队使用原型仪器的首次经验。©2000 John Wiley &儿子,Inc。化学工程学报(自然科学版),2003,19 (4):344 - 344
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technological innovation in field analytical chemistry A compact optical system for multi-determination of biochemical oxygen demand using disposable strips On-site gas chromatographic determination of explosives in soils Real-time classification performance and failure mode analysis of a physical/chemical sensor array and a probabilistic neural network Minicolumn field sampling and flow-injection-atomic absorption spectrometric determination of lead in seawater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1