A geopolitical map of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s world: A systematic description

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17223/23062061/28/1
Elena G. Novikova, Ekaterina M. Ponkratova, Anna G. Kozhevnikova
{"title":"A geopolitical map of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s world: A systematic description","authors":"Elena G. Novikova, Ekaterina M. Ponkratova, Anna G. Kozhevnikova","doi":"10.17223/23062061/28/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study lies in the facts that it explores the issues related to the global significance of Dostoevsky’s literary heritage and interdisciplinary approaches to analyzing Russian literature. The significance of the study is stipulated by the current state of scientific knowledge concerning a particular role of literary works in describing and interpreting global political and state processes. The aim of the study is to reconstruct and map Dostoevsky’s geopolitical worldview based on the analysis of his literary and journalistic works. To consider the writer’s works from the standpoint of his involvement into the political issues is the first attempt within Dostoevsky studies. The analysis of Dostoevsky’s literary heritage from a geopolitical perspective was carried out on the basis of Statisticheskiy slovar’ yazyka Dostoevskogo [Statistical Dictionary of Dostoevsky’s Language]. However, since this book does not contain draft notes and earlier versions, preliminary drafts and notebook materials, these texts were intentionally explored. This is the first literary study of its kind which is based on a variety of modern statistical methods. This fact makes it possible to state that the obtained results present new knowledge about Dostoevsky and are of undisputed novelty. The study is focused on big geopolitical subjects, i.e. countries, transnational and national unions, prominent regions; therefore, the present article is only the first stage of the study. In accordance with the conducted analysis and calculations, the following frequency of geopolitical subjects’ mentions is proposed: Russia (4420); France (848); Germany (735); Britain (397); Turkey (304); Siberia (223); Italy (173); Switzerland (172); Poland (145); Austria (141); America (119); Bulgaria (83); Serbia (83); China (49); Spain (40); Montenegro (38); Caucasus (38); Crimea (30); Egypt (26); Greece (23); Hungary (19); Balkans (18); Central Asia (18); Holland (15); Syria (14); Herzegovina (13); Novorossiya (10); Sweden (7); Japan (6); Altai (5); Arabia, Africa, Bosnia, Dagestan, India, Lithuania, Mexico, Sicily, Finland (each 4); Belgium, Iceland, Malta, Peru, Sandwich Islands (each 3); Brazil, Brittany, Denmark, Israel, Moldova, Romania, Sakhalin (each 2); and Galicia (1). The frequency of geopolitical subjects’ mentions by years is as follows: 1877 (2100), 1876 (1516), 1860 (567), 1880 (502), 1872 (388), 1873 (381), 1868 (366), 1862 (328), 1866 (265), 1875 (264), 1869 (170), 1863 (155), 1881 (135), 1867 (128), 1878 (122), 1864 (120), 1859 (102), 1874 (100), 1870 (96), 1856 (75), 1861 (61), 1871 (54), 1865 (52), 1846 (43), 1847 (41), 1849 (38), 1858 (25), 1854 (21), 1848 (15), 1857 (12), 1845 (5), 1843-1844 (3), 1838-1839 (2), 1879 (1); geopolitical subjects were not mentioned in 1841, 1842, 1850, 1851, 1852, 1853, and 1855. he authors express their deep gratitude to M.V. Podrezov for his assistance in preparing this article. Contribution of the authors: the authors contributed equally to this article. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":40676,"journal":{"name":"Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/23062061/28/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study lies in the facts that it explores the issues related to the global significance of Dostoevsky’s literary heritage and interdisciplinary approaches to analyzing Russian literature. The significance of the study is stipulated by the current state of scientific knowledge concerning a particular role of literary works in describing and interpreting global political and state processes. The aim of the study is to reconstruct and map Dostoevsky’s geopolitical worldview based on the analysis of his literary and journalistic works. To consider the writer’s works from the standpoint of his involvement into the political issues is the first attempt within Dostoevsky studies. The analysis of Dostoevsky’s literary heritage from a geopolitical perspective was carried out on the basis of Statisticheskiy slovar’ yazyka Dostoevskogo [Statistical Dictionary of Dostoevsky’s Language]. However, since this book does not contain draft notes and earlier versions, preliminary drafts and notebook materials, these texts were intentionally explored. This is the first literary study of its kind which is based on a variety of modern statistical methods. This fact makes it possible to state that the obtained results present new knowledge about Dostoevsky and are of undisputed novelty. The study is focused on big geopolitical subjects, i.e. countries, transnational and national unions, prominent regions; therefore, the present article is only the first stage of the study. In accordance with the conducted analysis and calculations, the following frequency of geopolitical subjects’ mentions is proposed: Russia (4420); France (848); Germany (735); Britain (397); Turkey (304); Siberia (223); Italy (173); Switzerland (172); Poland (145); Austria (141); America (119); Bulgaria (83); Serbia (83); China (49); Spain (40); Montenegro (38); Caucasus (38); Crimea (30); Egypt (26); Greece (23); Hungary (19); Balkans (18); Central Asia (18); Holland (15); Syria (14); Herzegovina (13); Novorossiya (10); Sweden (7); Japan (6); Altai (5); Arabia, Africa, Bosnia, Dagestan, India, Lithuania, Mexico, Sicily, Finland (each 4); Belgium, Iceland, Malta, Peru, Sandwich Islands (each 3); Brazil, Brittany, Denmark, Israel, Moldova, Romania, Sakhalin (each 2); and Galicia (1). The frequency of geopolitical subjects’ mentions by years is as follows: 1877 (2100), 1876 (1516), 1860 (567), 1880 (502), 1872 (388), 1873 (381), 1868 (366), 1862 (328), 1866 (265), 1875 (264), 1869 (170), 1863 (155), 1881 (135), 1867 (128), 1878 (122), 1864 (120), 1859 (102), 1874 (100), 1870 (96), 1856 (75), 1861 (61), 1871 (54), 1865 (52), 1846 (43), 1847 (41), 1849 (38), 1858 (25), 1854 (21), 1848 (15), 1857 (12), 1845 (5), 1843-1844 (3), 1838-1839 (2), 1879 (1); geopolitical subjects were not mentioned in 1841, 1842, 1850, 1851, 1852, 1853, and 1855. he authors express their deep gratitude to M.V. Podrezov for his assistance in preparing this article. Contribution of the authors: the authors contributed equally to this article. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陀思妥耶夫斯基世界的地缘政治地图:系统描述
这项研究的相关性在于,它探讨了陀思妥耶夫斯基文学遗产的全球意义以及分析俄罗斯文学的跨学科方法。这项研究的意义是由科学知识的现状所规定的,这一现状涉及文学作品在描述和解释全球政治和国家进程中的特定作用。本研究旨在通过对陀思妥耶夫斯基文学和新闻作品的分析,重构陀思妥耶夫斯基的地缘政治世界观。在陀思妥耶夫斯基研究中,第一次尝试从陀思妥耶夫斯基卷入政治问题的角度来考察陀思妥耶夫斯基的作品。从地缘政治的角度分析陀思妥耶夫斯基的文学遗产,是在statisticcheskiy slovar的《陀思妥耶夫斯基语言统计词典》的基础上进行的。然而,由于这本书不包含草稿笔记和早期版本,初稿和笔记本材料,这些文本是有意探索。这是第一个基于各种现代统计方法的文学研究。这一事实使我们有可能说,所获得的结果提供了关于陀思妥耶夫斯基的新知识,并且具有无可争议的新颖性。研究的重点是地缘政治大课题,即国家、跨国和民族联盟、突出地区;因此,本文只是研究的第一阶段。根据所进行的分析和计算,建议地缘政治主题的提及频率如下:俄罗斯(4420);法国(848);德国(735);英国(397);土耳其(304);西伯利亚(223);意大利(173);瑞士(172);波兰(145);奥地利(141);美国(119);保加利亚(83);塞尔维亚(83);中国(49);西班牙(40);黑山共和国(38);高加索(38);克里米亚(30);埃及(26);希腊(23);匈牙利(19);巴尔干半岛(18);中亚(18);荷兰(15);叙利亚(14);黑塞哥维那(13);Novorossiya (10);瑞典(7);日本(6);阿尔泰(5);阿拉伯、非洲、波斯尼亚、达吉斯坦、印度、立陶宛、墨西哥、西西里岛、芬兰(各4个);比利时、冰岛、马耳他、秘鲁、桑威奇群岛(各3个);巴西、布列塔尼、丹麦、以色列、摩尔多瓦、罗马尼亚、库页岛(各2个);和加利西亚(1)。地缘政治的频率受试者所提到如下:1877年(2100),1876(1516),1860(567),1880(502),1872(388),1873(381),1868(366),1862(328),1866(265),1875(264),1869(170),1863(155),1881(135),1867(128),1878(122),1864(120),1859(102),1874(100),1870(96),1856(75),1861(61),1871年(54),1865 (52),1846 (43),1847 (41),1849 (38),1858 (25),1854 (21)1848 (15),1857 (12),1845 (5),1843 - 1844 (3),1838 - 1839 (2),1879 (1);在1841年、1842年、1850年、1851年、1852年、1853年和1855年没有提到地缘政治科目。作者对M.V. Podrezov在撰写本文时提供的帮助深表感谢。作者的贡献:作者对本文的贡献是平等的。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing
Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Titles of editions: Between advertising and pragmatics On church singing in the Fedoseevtsy collection Paternal Testaments. Article I The reader-character in Yuri Felzen’s novel Letters about Lermontov Book review: Tatsumi, Y. & Tsurumi, T. (eds) (2020) Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A history of print media from Enlightenment to Revolution. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 280 р. Perception of pictorial text: Problematization, actualization, new methodological approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1