Effect and satisfaction evaluation of post-abortion care service based on Wechat follow-up on contraceptive compliance of repetitive induced abortion patients

Tao Sun, Songwei Wang, Changdong Li
{"title":"Effect and satisfaction evaluation of post-abortion care service based on Wechat follow-up on contraceptive compliance of repetitive induced abortion patients","authors":"Tao Sun, Songwei Wang, Changdong Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the effect of post-abortion care service based on Wechat follow-up on contraceptive compliance of multiple induced abortion patients, and to evaluate the satisfaction with PAC service. \n \n \nMethods \nA quasi-experimental method was adopted. A total of 300 cases of induced abortion were selected in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from March 2018 to March 2019, with 150 cases from eastern branch in the experimental group and 150 cases from western branch in the control group. The control group received routine nursing care and post-abortion care service based on telephone follow-up, while the experimental group received routine nursing care and post-abortion care service based on Wechat follow-up. The missing rate of follow-up, the contraceptive method and the occurrence of unexpected pregnancy within one year after operation were collected in the two groups. Patients′ follow-up compliance and nursing satisfaction were evaluated. \n \n \nResults \nThe awareness of the risk of induced abortion in the experimental group was 90.4% (120/135) higher than that in the control group 77.5% (88/111), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 value was 9.128, P=0.010). The contraceptive consciousness of the two groups was 99.3% (134/135) and 94.6% (105/135), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 value was 3.256, P=0.071). There was a statistically significant difference in the missing rate of follow-up between the two groups in January, March, June, and December (χ2 value was 13.664, P=0.003). Compared with 19.8% (22/111) in the control group, 73.3% (99/135) patients in the study group chose high-efficiency contraception, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 value was 69.795, P<0.01).There were no recurring pregnancies in the experimental group within one year, compared with 6.3% (7/111) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 value was 6.630, P=0.003). In the experimental group, the participation rate of the follow-up were (95.37±12.29)%, which were higher than that in the control group (90.77±16.49)%. The difference was statistically significant (t value was 2.438, P<0.05). The overall satisfaction score of the experimental group was 26.55 ± 2.80, which was higher than that of the control group (23.66 ± 3.32). The difference was statistically significant (t value was 7.285, P <0.01). \n \n \nConclusion \nPost-abortion care service based on Wechat follow-up could enhance patients′ compliance and satisfaction, guide patients to choose the right contraceptive methods, reduce the rate of repeated abortion and promote female reproductive health. \n \n \nKey words: \nPost-abortion care; Repeated induced abortion; Contraception; Follow-up; Compliance","PeriodicalId":22999,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practical nursing","volume":"62 1","pages":"429-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practical nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.06.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of post-abortion care service based on Wechat follow-up on contraceptive compliance of multiple induced abortion patients, and to evaluate the satisfaction with PAC service. Methods A quasi-experimental method was adopted. A total of 300 cases of induced abortion were selected in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from March 2018 to March 2019, with 150 cases from eastern branch in the experimental group and 150 cases from western branch in the control group. The control group received routine nursing care and post-abortion care service based on telephone follow-up, while the experimental group received routine nursing care and post-abortion care service based on Wechat follow-up. The missing rate of follow-up, the contraceptive method and the occurrence of unexpected pregnancy within one year after operation were collected in the two groups. Patients′ follow-up compliance and nursing satisfaction were evaluated. Results The awareness of the risk of induced abortion in the experimental group was 90.4% (120/135) higher than that in the control group 77.5% (88/111), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 value was 9.128, P=0.010). The contraceptive consciousness of the two groups was 99.3% (134/135) and 94.6% (105/135), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 value was 3.256, P=0.071). There was a statistically significant difference in the missing rate of follow-up between the two groups in January, March, June, and December (χ2 value was 13.664, P=0.003). Compared with 19.8% (22/111) in the control group, 73.3% (99/135) patients in the study group chose high-efficiency contraception, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 value was 69.795, P<0.01).There were no recurring pregnancies in the experimental group within one year, compared with 6.3% (7/111) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 value was 6.630, P=0.003). In the experimental group, the participation rate of the follow-up were (95.37±12.29)%, which were higher than that in the control group (90.77±16.49)%. The difference was statistically significant (t value was 2.438, P<0.05). The overall satisfaction score of the experimental group was 26.55 ± 2.80, which was higher than that of the control group (23.66 ± 3.32). The difference was statistically significant (t value was 7.285, P <0.01). Conclusion Post-abortion care service based on Wechat follow-up could enhance patients′ compliance and satisfaction, guide patients to choose the right contraceptive methods, reduce the rate of repeated abortion and promote female reproductive health. Key words: Post-abortion care; Repeated induced abortion; Contraception; Follow-up; Compliance
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于微信随访的反复人工流产患者避孕依从性的流产后护理服务效果及满意度评价
目的探讨基于微信随访的流产后护理服务对多次人工流产患者避孕依从性的影响,并评价PAC服务的满意度。方法采用准实验方法。选择2018年3月至2019年3月在首都医科大学附属北京妇产科医院人工流产患者300例,其中东部分院150例为实验组,西部分院150例为对照组。对照组采用电话随访的常规护理及流产后护理服务,实验组采用微信随访的常规护理及流产后护理服务。收集两组患者术后1年内随访失踪率、避孕方法及意外妊娠发生情况。评估患者的随访依从性和护理满意度。结果实验组对人工流产风险的知知率为90.4%(120/135),高于对照组77.5%(88/111),差异有统计学意义(χ2值为9.128,P=0.010)。两组患者的避孕意识分别为99.3%(134/135)和94.6%(105/135),差异无统计学意义(χ2值为3.256,P=0.071)。两组患者1月、3月、6月、12月随访失踪率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2值为13.664,P=0.003)。与对照组的19.8%(22/111)相比,研究组73.3%(99/135)的患者选择高效避孕,差异有统计学意义(χ2值为69.795,P<0.01)。实验组1年内无再次妊娠,对照组为6.3%(7/111),差异有统计学意义(χ2值为6.630,P=0.003)。实验组的随访参与率为(95.37±12.29)%,高于对照组(90.77±16.49)%。差异有统计学意义(t值为2.438,P<0.05)。实验组患者总体满意度得分为26.55±2.80分,高于对照组的23.66±3.32分。差异有统计学意义(t值为7.285,P <0.01)。结论基于微信随访的流产后护理服务可提高患者的依从性和满意度,指导患者选择正确的避孕方法,降低重复流产率,促进女性生殖健康。关键词:流产后护理;反复人工流产;避孕;随访;合规
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elder abuse. Construction of core Competence Index System for nursing emergency personnel in infectious disease emergencies——thinking on nursing emergency rescue based on COVID-19 epidemic Heat reactions. A qualitative study on the cognition of the first group of nurses to protect against instrumentrelated stress injury in the novel coronavirus pneumonia Opportunity for service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1